martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
- 2,300
That’s not strict constructionism. That’s originalism.
A constructionist would say that if they wanted equal protection to only apply to race, they would have said so.
You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.
Don’t tell me you believe the authors of the reconstruction amendments were still racist as shit. They were. Claiming they intended interracial marriage to be banned by the 14th amendment is fucking stupid.
They didn't. That's why loving happened to fix the errors of the legislatures and various miscegenation laws.
And the supporters of the Reconstruction Amendments were the radical republicans, some of the least racist people around at the time.