BREAKING: FBI May Have Flipped Flynn

[Faun]

Team Trump is starting to show cracks in it's armor

Lets see if it leads to Fat Donny or just picks up Steve Bannon

I'd bet on Bannon being treasonous before Trump. Loooong before. I strongly doubt Trump did anything treasonous for aforementioned reasons. Bannon? I don't trust him. Anyone who is a white supremacist is violating the principles of both Christianity and our Constitution.

You're probably right, by Trump is the one going down if Flynn testifies against him.

 

[Divine Wind]

You're probably right, by Trump is the one going down if Flynn testifies against him.

Big word "IF". Even "IF" Flynn testified against Trump in the most delicious masturbatury dreams of the LWLs, it's still up to a jury to decide if Flynn's testimony is reliable. Lot's of factors to consider. As we saw several times with Bill Clinton, people testifying against someone often doesn't stick. It comes down to people for the person and, mostly, the evidence. Factual verifiable evidence, not just a person's opinion.

 

[Old Rocks]

Getting a blow job in the Oval Office is not quite in the same league as working with an enemy power to influence an Presidential election.

 

[Divine Wind]

Getting a blow job in the Oval Office is not quite in the same league as working with an enemy power to influence an Presidential election.

Agreed. Same goes for cheating people in real estate scams, sexually harassing and raping women.

 

[Faun]

You're probably right, by Trump is the one going down if Flynn testifies against him.

Big word "IF". Even "IF" Flynn testified against Trump in the most delicious masturbatury dreams of the LWLs, it's still up to a jury to decide if Flynn's testimony is reliable. Lot's of factors to consider. As we saw several times with Bill Clinton, people testifying against someone often doesn't stick. It comes down to people for the person and, mostly, the evidence. Factual verifiable evidence, not just a person's opinion.

Jury? What jury? This is a federal investigation. There is no jury. If Flynn gets immunity, it will be to provide testimony to federal investigators.

 

[Divine Wind]

Jury? What jury? This is a federal investigation. There is no jury. If Flynn gets immunity, it will be to provide testimony to federal investigators.

Great waffle! You should make an iron out of it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Flynn's attorney says emphatically "NO.."

The OP's quoting of Seth is not only factually inaccurate but wholly made up propaganda.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Flynn wants immunity from Democrat lies! If he gets immunity it won't be worth concocting stories.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Flynn wants immunity from Democrat lies! If he gets immunity it won't be worth concocting stories.

Flynn's attorney said he would not allow his client to say a word to anyone without Immunity due to the political witch hunt that is going on.

 

[JoeB131]

Nice flip-flop. When all those in Hillary's aides were being given immunity, didn't you say that doesn't mean they are guilty? Which one is it? Or does it only matter if they have an "R" or a "D" after their name?

When did this happen? As I recall, they tried to give a guy immunity and then tried to prosecute him when he wouldn't tell them what they wanted to hear.

All those who ended up on prison for it thought it was a big deal. Good thing Bill pardoned a lot of them!

Whitewater controversy - Wikipedia
Fifteen other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including Jim Guy Tucker, who was removed from office.

Which goes to show how much an abuse the IC Statue was. No one at the time it happened thought it was that big of a deal. You invest in real estate, you take a risk. Then along comes Ken Starr, who pretty much indicted you if you looked at him funny.

There's a reason why they let the IC Statue lapse after Starr was done, you know. No one wanted to see someone like him.

Let's not forget, this is the same piece of shit Ken Starr who let his star athletes rape coeds at Baylor because he didn't want to lose money.

 

[JoeB131]

I'd bet on Bannon being treasonous before Trump. Loooong before. I strongly doubt Trump did anything treasonous for aforementioned reasons. Bannon? I don't trust him. Anyone who is a white supremacist is violating the principles of both Christianity and our Constitution.

yet you let these people win.

 

[gipper]

I'd bet on Bannon being treasonous before Trump. Loooong before. I strongly doubt Trump did anything treasonous for aforementioned reasons. Bannon? I don't trust him. Anyone who is a white supremacist is violating the principles of both Christianity and our Constitution.

yet you let these people win.

...but we know Hillary is a traitor.

 

[Divine Wind]

Nice flip-flop. When all those in Hillary's aides were being given immunity, didn't you say that doesn't mean they are guilty? Which one is it? Or does it only matter if they have an "R" or a "D" after their name?

When did this happen? As I recall, they tried to give a guy immunity and then tried to prosecute him when he wouldn't tell them what they wanted to hear.

All those who ended up on prison for it thought it was a big deal. Good thing Bill pardoned a lot of them!

Whitewater controversy - Wikipedia
Fifteen other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including Jim Guy Tucker, who was removed from office.

Which goes to show how much an abuse the IC Statue was. No one at the time it happened thought it was that big of a deal. You invest in real estate, you take a risk. Then along comes Ken Starr, who pretty much indicted you if you looked at him funny.

There's a reason why they let the IC Statue lapse after Starr was done, you know. No one wanted to see someone like him.

Let's not forget, this is the same piece of shit Ken Starr who let his star athletes rape coeds at Baylor because he didn't want to lose money.

Great waffling, dude!

Clinton tech aide takes 5th in deposition
A former computer technology aide to Hillary Clinton repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment Wednesday during a court-ordered deposition in a lawsuit related to Clinton's private email set-up, according a conservative group pressing the legal case.

Tech specialist Bryan Pagliano asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination "more than 125 times" during the testimony, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in an interview.

 

[Divine Wind]

I'd bet on Bannon being treasonous before Trump. Loooong before. I strongly doubt Trump did anything treasonous for aforementioned reasons. Bannon? I don't trust him. Anyone who is a white supremacist is violating the principles of both Christianity and our Constitution.

yet you let these people win.

It's all my fault? LOL Niiiiiiice. I had no idea I was so powerful!

 

[JoeB131]

A former computer technology aide to Hillary Clinton repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment Wednesday during a court-ordered deposition in a lawsuit related to Clinton's private email set-up, according a conservative group pressing the legal case.

Tech specialist Bryan Pagliano asserted his constitutional right against self-incrimination "more than 125 times" during the testimony, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in an interview.

Darn Straight. And they didn't offer him immunity, did they? I'd tell Judicial watch to get bent, too.

But Flynn hasn't been called by anyone, yet, has he?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[Divine Wind]

So are the LWLs here agreed that being granted immunity doesn't mean a person is guilty of a crime? Or does asking for or being granted immunity depending upon their political affiliations?

Five Clinton aides received immunity deals in FBI probe
Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's former chief of staff, received an immunity deal from the Justice Department during the year-long FBI investigation of Clinton's server.

Two other State Department staffers, John Bentel and Heather Samuelson, were also given immunity agreements, bringing the total number of witnesses who were protected by deals to five.

Bryan Pagliano, Clinton's former IT aide, and Paul Combetta, an employee at the firm hired to manage her server after she left the State Department, received such protection through deals that were reported previously.

The immunity agreements given to Mills and Samuelson covered the evidence recovered from their computers, a Democratic staffer told the Washington Examiner. The deals did not extend to their testimony before Congress or to the information they told the FBI, the staffer said.


Pagliano was held in contempt of Congress Thursday for his failure to comply with a subpoena for testimony and documents. Combetta appeared before the House Oversight Committee last week, but invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer questions.

The FBI has said Clinton and her staff exhibited "extreme carelessness" by sharing classified information on an unsecured server that was kept in Clinton's basement.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said the immunity deals were "beyond explanation."

"I've lost confidence in this investigation and I question the genuine effort in which it was carried out," Chaffetz said in a statement. "Immunity deals should not be a requirement for cooperating with the FBI."

The Utah Republican said the FBI was "handing out immunity agreements like candy."

Mills testified in May that she did not know Clinton had used a private server to host her emails, telling conservative-leaning Judicial Watch in a deposition that she did not recall most details about the former secretary of state's email use.

Mills also invoked attorney-client privilige over some of what she and Clinton had said in discussions about the emails, as Mills was permitted to serve as counsel for the Democratic nominee in addition to her role as a witness in the investigation against her.

Samuelson, who enjoyed the same type of immunity deal given to Mills, was tasked with sorting through Clinton's emails in 2014 after the State Department asked Clinton to turn over her work-related records. As such, investigators feared Samuelson had stored potentially classified materials on her computer.

Under the deal provided to Samuelson, the Justice Department would not prosecute her for any classified emails discovered on her hard drive if the former aide agreed to relinquish her computer to the FBI.

The Associated Press first reported Mills' immunity agreement....

 

[JoeB131]

So are the LWLs here agreed that being granted immunity doesn't mean a person is guilty of a crime? Or does asking for or being granted immunity depending upon their political affiliations?

since the E-mail investigation was bullshit to start with, so were the immunity deals.

Again, none of these people asked to be part of a bullshit investigation. General McWhacky is preemtively asking for immunity because he KNOWS he did something wrong.

But until I am sure we can use him to get Trump out of office, let him swing in the wind.

 

[Divine Wind]

So are the LWLs here agreed that being granted immunity doesn't mean a person is guilty of a crime? Or does asking for or being granted immunity depending upon their political affiliations?

since the E-mail investigation was bullshit to start with, so were the immunity deals.

Again, none of these people asked to be part of a bullshit investigation. General McWhacky is preemtively asking for immunity because he KNOWS he did something wrong.

But until I am sure we can use him to get Trump out of office, let him swing in the wind.

Translation: Immunity deals equaling guilt only applies to Republicans, not Democrats.


Thanks for your input, Joe.

 

[JoeB131]

Translation: Immunity deals equaling guilt only applies to Republicans, not Democrats.


Thanks for your input, Joe.

Naw, it's applying a little common sense. They offered those folks immunity deals hoping that they'd break bad on Hillary... which they didn't.

As opposed to Flynn, who is offering testimony no one asked him for for immunity.

Which I'm totally fine with giving him if he can give us the dirt on Trump. Otherwise, we've already got him for lying to the FBI.