Breaking: Grand Jury Returns Superceding Indictment Against Doald Trump

skews13

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2017
9,978
12,848
2,415
A Washington, D.C. grand jury has returned a superseding indictment against Donald Trump for his involvement in the attempts to overthrow the 2020 election.

Superseding indictments typically mean that the charges or definitions differ. As the Justice Department defines, "If an indictment is dismissed because of legal defect or grand jury irregularity, the government may return a new indictment within six months of the date of dismissal or within the original limitation period (whichever is later)."

According to Georgia constitutional law professor Anthony Michael Kreis, "The superseding indictment is the Special Counsel's attempt to adhere to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision without showing the prosecution's cards in an evidentiary hearing a/k/a a mini trial. Jack Smith is working to preserve his case and move expeditiously."



For the magamites that don't know what this means. This is an entirely different indictment heard by another grand jury. In this filing, any testimony, or statements that may be considered immunity have been removed from the preceding case. There won't be any reviews by the Supreme Court, or any chance of the case being thrown out on those grounds.

There won't be any slithering out of this one. Brilliant move by the special counsel. And this case won't be in the friendly confines of Florida.
 
A Washington, D.C. grand jury has returned a superseding indictment against Donald Trump for his involvement in the attempts to overthrow the 2020 election.

Superseding indictments typically mean that the charges or definitions differ. As the Justice Department defines, "If an indictment is dismissed because of legal defect or grand jury irregularity, the government may return a new indictment within six months of the date of dismissal or within the original limitation period (whichever is later)."

According to Georgia constitutional law professor Anthony Michael Kreis, "The superseding indictment is the Special Counsel's attempt to adhere to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision without showing the prosecution's cards in an evidentiary hearing a/k/a a mini trial. Jack Smith is working to preserve his case and move expeditiously."



For the magamites that don't know what this means. This is an entirely different indictment heard by another grand jury. In this filing, any testimony, or statements that may be considered immunity have been removed from the preceding case. There won't be any reviews by the Supreme Court, or any chance of the case being thrown out on those grounds.

There won't be any slithering out of this one. Brilliant move by the special counsel. And this case won't be in the friendly confines of Florida.
No surprising that with Kamala Harris starting to go back down in the polls Democrats weaponization of the justice system needs to step in.
 
A Washington, D.C. grand jury has returned a superseding indictment against Donald Trump for his involvement in the attempts to overthrow the 2020 election.

Superseding indictments typically mean that the charges or definitions differ. As the Justice Department defines, "If an indictment is dismissed because of legal defect or grand jury irregularity, the government may return a new indictment within six months of the date of dismissal or within the original limitation period (whichever is later)."

According to Georgia constitutional law professor Anthony Michael Kreis, "The superseding indictment is the Special Counsel's attempt to adhere to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision without showing the prosecution's cards in an evidentiary hearing a/k/a a mini trial. Jack Smith is working to preserve his case and move expeditiously."



For the magamites that don't know what this means. This is an entirely different indictment heard by another grand jury. In this filing, any testimony, or statements that may be considered immunity have been removed from the preceding case. There won't be any reviews by the Supreme Court, or any chance of the case being thrown out on those grounds.

There won't be any slithering out of this one. Brilliant move by the special counsel. And this case won't be in the friendly confines of Florida.
Assuming that Jack is in fact not validly appointed, his appeal shouldn’t even be accepted. Presumably it would have to be appealed by our illustrious AG, that scumbag Meritless Garland.

But one way or the other, when the court gets the appeal, it should be affirmed.

And unless his appointment’s invalidity is straightened out, it shouldn’t even be heard.

Still. It could be heard. Jack could “get” the relief he seeks. But that decision could also be reversed on appeal.

Fuck Jack Smith.
 
1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top