BREAKING: House Republicans Locate Emails and Text Messages Implicating Pelosi in Failed Jan 6 Capitol Security Operation

Instead of criticize my words like we're in a class room, do you actually think that trump wasn't the cause of all the violence and killing on January 6th. This thing was planned. Trump knew that he lost..
Nope. Nazi Pelosi was.
 
Too bad you welching loser. That was the result of their investigation. Not old intel no matter how much you lie and cry. No coordinated insurrection and no connection to Trump retard. Keep flailing drunk asshole.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 87–664, § 6(a), Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 903, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 947; Pub. L. 94–435, title I, § 105, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1389; Pub. L. 97–291, § 4(d), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766.)
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

:fu:
 

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 87–664, § 6(a), Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 903, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 947; Pub. L. 94–435, title I, § 105, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1389; Pub. L. 97–291, § 4(d), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766.)
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

:fu:
"delay the execution of any law of the United States"

That opens the door to every infraction committed, so the charge is meaningless.
 
The cause of violence were the individuals that chose violence, not Trump. All he did was hold a rally and people on the other end at the Capitol chose to bust into the building.

RAY RAY!!!!! how'z it hangin'?

anyhoo - some of them thar flying monkeys of donny's testified under oath that they did what they did 'cause their 'president' said to.

Unless you're going to blame Bernie Sanders for the attack on Republicans at the baseball fields or whoever the leftist was that leaked the judges opinion on Roe vs Wade for the planned assassination on Justice Kavanaugh, you can't blame Trump for how others reacted to his rally.

soooooooooooo ... who has testified that they did anything violent cause of bernies or whatever other crap you are peddling?
 
Last edited:
"delay the execution of any law of the United States"

That opens the door to every infraction committed, so the charge is meaningless.

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Leader of Oath Keepers and Oath Keepers Member Found Guilty of Seditious Conspiracy and Other Charges Related to U.S. Capitol Breach​

Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, the founder and leader of the Oath Keepers, and Kelly Meggs, the leader of the Florida chapter of the organization, were found guilty by a jury today of seditious conspiracy and other charges for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Their actions disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election.
Three additional defendants, who were leaders and associates of the organization – Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell – were found guilty of related felony charges. The verdict followed an eight-week trial and three days of deliberations. No sentencing date was set.
“Today the jury returned a verdict convicting all defendants of criminal conduct, including two Oath Keepers leaders for seditious conspiracy against the United States,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “The Justice Department is committed to holding accountable those criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy on January 6, 2021. The prosecutors and agents on this case worked tirelessly, with extraordinary skill, and in the best traditions of the Department of Justice.”
Leader of Oath Keepers and Oath Keepers Member Found Guilty of Seditious Conspiracy and Other Charges Related to U.S. Capitol Breach.

:itsok:
 
RAY RAY!!!!! how'z it hangin'?

anyhoo - some of them thar flying monkeys of donny's testified under oath that they did what they did 'cause their 'president' said to.



soooooooooooo ... who has testified that they did anything violent cause of bernies or whatever other crap you are peddling?
A prog nutburger shot several Republican members of Congress, you dumb asshole.
 
You can prove that? To this point, DOJ has not.

'Because President Trump said to': Over a dozen Capitol rioters say they were following Trump's guidance​

Some of them are accused of perpetrating the attack's most violent crimes.
ByOlivia Rubin, Alexander Mallin, and Alex Hosenball
February 9, 2021, 8:06 AM

An ABC News investigation into the nearly 200 accused rioters facing federal charges for their alleged involvement at the Capitol -- based on court filings, military records, interviews, and available news reports-- found that at least fifteen individuals who stormed the building have since said that they acted based on Trump's encouragement, including some of those accused of the most violent and serious crimes.

"I believed I was following the instructions of former President Trump," said Garret Miller in a statement released through his lawyer. "I also left Washington and started back to Texas immediately after President Trump asked us to go home."

Miller, who admitted to entering the Capitol in his statement, also threatened to "assassinate" Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez that same day, which he apologized for.
[...]
Robert Bauer told FBI Agents in an interview that he "marched to the U.S. Capitol because President Trump said to do so," according to court records. Bauer pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, according to local reports. His lawyer declined to comment when reached by ABC News.

At least one rioter said he is willing to testify during the impeachment trial about how Trump's words resonated with him, according to his lawyer.

"He heard the words of the president. He believed them. He genuinely believed him," Jacob Chansley's lawyer, Al Watkins, told ABC News in an interview. "He thought the president was walking with him."

During his speech at the "Stop the Steal" rally on the National Mall before the riot, Trump had urged his supporters to "walk down to the Capitol" alongside him to protest the certification of the election. "You'll never take back our country with weakness," Trump declared. "You have to show strength, and you have to be strong."
[...]
'Because President Trump said to': Over a dozen Capitol rioters say they were following Trump's guidance
 
A prog nutburger shot several Republican members of Congress, you dumb asshole.

i am well aware of that mass shooting & who was responsible for it.

so, the shooter was instructed to carry out his attempted killing because he was TOLD TO? you are trying to compare here - so where's that equivalency you think you have but don't?
 
i am well aware of that mass shooting & who was responsible for it.

so, the shooter was instructed to carry out his attempted killing because he was TOLD TO? you are trying to compare here - so where's that equivalency you think you have but don't?
There is no equivalence. Who told anyone to riot on Jan 6? That Bernie admiring nutburger shot several people. The capitol police are the only ones who shot anyone on Jan 6.
 
RAY RAY!!!!! how'z it hangin'?

anyhoo - some of them thar flying monkeys of donny's testified under oath that they did what they did 'cause their 'president' said to.

So who gives a shit what they said? If I tell you I'm really hurting for money, and you go out and rob a bank because that's what you thought I wanted you to do, do I get charged for it or you? Do I go to prison or you?

In a normal court of law (not clown show) a judge would throw out such a case based on stupidity. I can't control what other people may or may not think.

soooooooooooo ... who has testified that they did anything violent cause of bernies or whatever other crap you are peddling?

No chance of him testifying because they shot him and he died in the hospital. However they went into his computer and learned he was a hard core Sanders follower.
 
An ABC News investigation into the nearly 200 accused rioters facing federal charges for their alleged involvement at the Capitol -- based on court filings, military records, interviews, and available news reports-- found that at least fifteen individuals who stormed the building have since said that they acted based on Trump's encouragement, including some of those accused of the most violent and serious crimes.

playtime

prove it. from a legit source.

Uh oh.....

The “Trump-made-me-do-it” defense is already looking like a longshot.

Facing damning evidence in the deadly Capitol siege last month — including social media posts flaunting their actions — rioters are arguing in court they were following then-President Donald Trump's instructions on Jan. 6. But the legal strategy has already been shot down by at least one judge and experts believe the argument is not likely to get anyone off the hook for the insurrection where five people died, including a police officer.

“This purported defense, if recognized, would undermine the rule of law because then, just like a king or a dictator, the president could dictate what’s illegal and what isn’t in this country," U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said recently in ordering pretrial detention of William Chrestman
, a suspected member of the Kansas City-area chapter of the Proud Boys. “And that is not how we operate here.”


'Blame Trump' defense in Capitol riot looks like a long shot

WASHINGTON (AP) — Mentions of Donald Trump have been rare at the first few trials for people charged with storming the U.S. Capitol, but that changed Tuesday: The latest Capitol riot defendant to go on trial is blaming his actions on the former president and his false claims about a stolen election.
___________________________________
“It’s Donald Trump himself spewing the lies and using his position to authorize this assault,” Shamansky told jurors Tuesday during the trial’s opening statements.

Justice Department prosecutor Jennifer Rozzoni said Thompson knew he was breaking the law that day.

“He chose to be a part of the mayhem and chaos,” she said.
_____________________________________
Prosecutors said Thompson can’t show that Trump or Giuliani had the authority to “empower” him to break the law. They also noted that video of the rally speeches “perfectly captures” the tone, delivery and context of the statements to the extent they are “marginally relevant” to proof of Thompson’s intent on Jan. 6.


Blame Trump? Jury hears that defense at Capitol riot trial

So how many got off using that defense?:auiqs.jpg:
 
The cause of violence were the individuals that chose violence, not Trump.
Trump called them there that day, told them lies to outrage them, and then sent them to the Capitol...knowing that many of them were armed
All he did was hold a rally and people on the other end at the Capitol chose to bust into the building.
Bullshit...Supporters WERE beginning the attack during his speech and they were joined by tens of thousands who came from that speech
 
Trump called them there that day, told them lies to outrage them, and then sent them to the Capitol...knowing that many of them were armed
You notice that didn't work in court?
 
What would a democratic liaison do and for who?

Excuse my illiteracy:

Index of Sen. Chuck Schumer's staff, past and present​

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-New York) - Staff salaries from LegiStorm

Kelly L. Fado, Congressional Staffer - Salary Data​


Kelly Fado - Senate Sergeant at Arms - Capitol Division (March 2021-), Deputy Sergeant at Arms - Congressional Salaries | LegiStorm

Great links! You proved she WASN'T on Schumer's staff on 1.5.2021...


Good job, keep up the good work!
thumbsup.gif
 
So when the 117th convened on J 3rd , 2021, who was in charge?
I can't find any bills the Turtle sent to the presidency between J 3 and J 20.

LOL

Not Schumer.

There is no limit to your ignorance, is there? Especially over something like this in which you could easily have found on the Internet to inform you that Schumer didn't become the Senate Majority Leader until, January 20th, 2021.

So again I ask, since again you haven't answered -- on January 5th, 2021, why on Earth would Kelly Fado warn Chuck Schumer about potential violence the next day since he wasn't the Senate Majority Leader (as falsely claimed) and she wasn't his aid (as falsely claimed)?

And when do you stop repeating fake news, like justthenews.com?
 
The only one KILLED that day was Ashley Babbitt you asshole!
The denying of the NG Troops requested by Trump surely was planned, as was the PLANDEMIC and STOLEN ELECTION!!!!
Yet you demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies cheer all of that on.

:rolleyes:

Trump made no such request.
 
"delay the execution of any law of the United States"

That opens the door to every infraction committed, so the charge is meaningless.

LOL

Those insurrectionist wannabes are already being convicted of that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top