BREAKING: Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate

[OldFlame]

OldFlamers confessing to being fucking retarded?

I did, guess you don't know how to read very well then.

 

[WEATHER53]

Liberals believe anyone crawling through a window unarmed should be shot but that minorities out in the streets burning looting and murdering deserve accolades and are to be unharmed and unapprehended .

 

[Marener]

He had no reason to think his life was in danger from her, therefore bad shoot.

When people see a violent mob smashing through a window of a barricaded door, reasonable people fear for their safety.

The standard is fear of life or serious bodily injury, by the way. You morons always forget the second part.

 

[konradv]

Liberals believe anyone crawling through a window unarmed should be shot but that minorities out in the streets burning looting and murdering deserve accolades and are to be unharmed and unapprehended .

How was the officer to know a member of a heavily 2A crowd was unarmed? I’ve never heard of suicide-by-cop being blamed on the cop.

 

[Marener]

Liberals believe anyone crawling through a window unarmed should be shot but that minorities out in the streets burning looting and murdering deserve accolades and are to be unharmed and unapprehended .

I never said she should be shot. I just said that the standards brought upon us by decades of conservative court cases made it permissible for her to be shot.

 

[martybegan]

When people see a violent mob smashing through a window of a barricaded door, reasonable people fear for their safety.

The standard is fear of life or serious bodily injury, by the way. You morons always forget the second part.

And yet other cops milled around with them on their side of the door completely unharmed.

 

[martybegan]

How was the officer to know a member of a heavily 2A crowd was unarmed? I’ve never heard of suicide-by-cop being blamed on the cop.

In a jurisdiction that doesn't recognize their permits if they have them?

 

[BlindBoo]

So their feet were in concrete and none of the 6 was in a position yet a guy who crept up from 80 feet away was fluid and good to go
The cartoon shit lib loons offer up belongs in elementary school

They couldn't even see Babbitt as she breached the barricaded doorway. The cartoon view of the rioters was shattered when she tried to breach that point of no return on her way to hunt down lawmakers. It suddenly became very real as they backed away from the area where she was shot.

 

[Marener]

And yet other cops milled around with them on their side of the door completely unharmed.

The rioters didn’t attack officers who weren’t trying to prevent them from doing whatever they wanted to do.

But it’s irrelevent. To justify deadly force, one just needs the perception of imminent harm. That’s why police get away with shooting people “armed” with a wallet in their hand that they mistake for a gun.

Again, just using the standards that conservative jurisprudence has brought us.

 

[BlindBoo]

I doubt it. Right after cops on the same side of the door as the protesters mingled freely with them, unharmed.

That's your misperception. The ones guarding the door on the rioters side were intimidated by the rioting crowd to abandon their position.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Lastamender]

Another Capitol Police officer interviewed on February 4, 2021, by Metro PD’s Internal Affairs Division advised that prior to Babbitt being shot, “He did not hear any verbal commands.”


Another Capitol Police officer was interviewed on February 4, 2021. In the transcript of his interview, he said that after the shooting of Babbitt, Lt. Byrd “was down and out” and “almost in tears.” He noted that when Babbitt was shot, “it wasn’t that loud”, despite having one of his ears completely uncovered. He also reported that he did not hear any verbal commands given by officers.
Byrd is lying.

BREAKING: Ashli Babbitt Shooting Documents UNCOVERED - Judicial Watch

BREAKING: New Questions about U.S. Capitol Police Shooting of Unarmed Ashli Babbitt DHS Ends Worksite Enforcement to Protect ‘Noncitizen Victims’ from Deportation Targeting Trump: Durham Uncovers New Clinton, FBI Connections in Russia Probe BREAKING: New Questions about U.S. Capitol Police...

www.judicialwatch.org

 

[martybegan]

The rioters didn’t attack officers who weren’t trying to prevent them from doing whatever they wanted to do.

But it’s irrelevent. To justify deadly force, one just needs the perception of imminent harm. That’s why police get away with shooting people “armed” with a wallet in their hand that they mistake for a gun.

Again, just using the standards that conservative jurisprudence has brought us.

if you are referring to the Diallo case, at least those officers were brought to trial.

Was this idiot ever tried?

 

[martybegan]

That's your misperception. The ones guarding the door on the rioters side were intimidated by the rioting crowd to abandon their position.

And yet none of them were harmed in any way whatsoever.

 

[Marener]

if you are referring to the Diallo case, at least those officers were brought to trial.

Was this idiot ever tried?

Im merely proving you don’t understand the legal standards.

It’s easy to do. You make lots of stupid mistakes and are too arrogant to listen to someone who knows better than you.

 

[Lastamender]

Im merely proving you don’t understand the legal standards.

It’s easy to do. You make lots of stupid mistakes and are too arrogant to listen to someone who knows better than you.

It proves our government doesn't understand legal standards. But can change them when it suits them. Any other cop would be charged with murder.

 

[Marener]

It proves our government doesn't understand legal standards.

The legal standard is based on the perception of a reasonable person.

So it wont make any sense to a delusional cultist like yourself.

 

[Lastamender]

The legal standard is based on the perception of a reasonable person.

So it wont make any sense to a delusional cultist like yourself.

Laws are not based on perceptions. You fucking idiot.

 

[martybegan]

Im merely proving you don’t understand the legal standards.

It’s easy to do. You make lots of stupid mistakes and are too arrogant to listen to someone who knows better than you.

You are opining on it, not proving anything.

You don't know shit, cum bucket.