BREAKING: Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate

The courts will determine this, right?

She was unarmed. How many store owners and cops have been charged for a crime when they shot a person who WAS armed, if only with a knife?

The courts have already determined that January 6th was an Insurrection, under the meaning of the Insurrection Act. Any participant in an insurrection who suffers injury or death, is a victim of their own criminal conduct, and that includes Ashli Babbitt.
 
She was more of a threat than the large men actually trying to break down the door?

Are you fucking retarded or something?
If he had been the one coming through the door, he would have been shot. Babbitt wanted to be first I guess.

People are less of a threat when separated from you by a barricaded door.
 
If he had been the one coming through the door, he would have been shot. Babbitt wanted to be first I guess.

People are less of a threat when separated from you by a barricaded door.

Yes, a 200lb large police officer needs to shoot an unarmed woman 125lbs soaking wet because she was a "threat"
 
Yes this Fact of multiple officers closer to Babbit than her murderer is not going away and Any jury will be sympathetic

No jury will be sympathetic to Babbit in this matter. The Babbit Family would be further ahead to sue Donald Trump for her death. The law suits against Trump by Capitol police officers will be far more successful than any suit against the US government, or the Capitol Police.

Your TDS leads you to believe that everyday Americans are sympathetic to the Insurrectionists. They are not.
 
None were in a position to fire. Neither the guards who were intimidated by the rioters to leave nor the guards waiting in the nearby stairwell could see the breach in progress that got her killed.
So their feet were in concrete and none of the 6 was in a position yet a guy who crept up from 80 feet away was fluid and good to go
The cartoon shit lib loons offer up belongs in elementary school
 
Yes, a 200lb large police officer needs to shoot an unarmed woman 125lbs soaking wet because she was a "threat"
In the context of the circumstances, she was. The people in that hallway and the adjoining chambers were very afraid.
 
In an interview, Rep Clay Higgins, a former deputy sheriff, said when Ashli was climbing through the window, that all Michael Byrd had to do is grab her and put zip ties on her and sat her down and called someone to come get her and take her away. That's it. Said he broke all the rules firing his pistol at her knowing she had 5 cops standing behind her.

If he had murdered one of the cops behind her, this would be an entirely different story. All the little lefties in here would be so torn over who to defend and who to vilify.
 
The other officers have been threatened to remain silent

You're completely deranged, fool. Americans want these people jailed. Nobody but the most ardent Trump fans think your heroine is anything BUT a terrorist.

 
Bull. Fucking. Shit. You. Authoritarian. Fucktard.
Totality of the circumstances. If she had been alone, sure arrest her. Shooting her would have been totally unwarranted. Given the circumstances included a violent riot with thousands of angry MAGA cultists who had already beaten and injured dozens of officers, the threat is different.
 
Totality of the circumstances. If she had been alone, sure arrest her. Shooting her would have been totally unwarranted. Given the circumstances included a violent riot with thousands of angry MAGA cultists who had already beaten and injured dozens of officers, the threat is different.

Someone else's current actions don't change another person's status when it comes to the use of deadly force.
 
You're completely deranged, fool. Americans want these people jailed. Nobody but the most ardent Trump fans think your heroine is anything BUT a terrorist.

You are not most Americans in fsct not American so continue to stare listlessly at the dirt road in front of abode and lash out.
 
Someone else's current actions don't change another person's status when it comes to the use of deadly force.
It changes the perception of the officer involved in the shooting and limits their options.

That’s why you have to consider the totality of the circumstances, like SCOTUS said.

The use of force can depend on whether it’s one criminal and ten cops or ten criminals and one cops. This should be obvious to you, but logic isn’t your strong suit.
 
It changes the perception of the officer involved in the shooting and limits their options.

That’s why you have to consider the totality of the circumstances, like SCOTUS said.

The use of force can depend on whether it’s one criminal and ten cops or ten criminals and one cops. This should be obvious to you, but logic isn’t your strong suit.

He had no reason to think his life was in danger from her, therefore bad shoot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top