Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s not a real lawsuit. It’s attention seeking to drive donations from suckers who take them seriously.
All you will discover is that Babbitt stormed the capital and was trying to break into the speakers chambers. I suppose some right wing group is paying the expenses.
The cops at the a house barricade were not the only ones with guns trained on their attackers.They will discover the idiot cop ignored use of deadly force rules.
The cops at the a house barricade were not the only ones with guns trained on their attackers.
Had the attackers done what Ashes did at those barricades there would have been more dead attackers.
And rightfully so
It’s going to be next to impossible to make a case against use of force in the context of a violent riot that had already injured dozens when used on someone committing crimes as part of that violent mob while protecting members of Congress.Oh, it's a real lawsuit. And they got a real case because the cop in question basically ignored the rules for use of lethal force.
It’s going to be next to impossible to make a case against use of force in the context of a violent riot that had already injured dozens when used on someone committing crimes as part of that violent mob while protecting members of Congress.
Juducial Watch lives off of donations and if they aren’t getting enough media attention, they have to stir some up to keep the lights on.
It’s a scam and dopes like you are the target.
The case will go nowhere and you’ll come up with a shitty excuse to ignore reality again. That’s what you do best.
Looks like a lot more people there than just one woman.deadly force, against one unarmed woman, and none of the other cops felt the need to open fire.
And yet you probably think the SPLC is a noble organization still.
Nobody else felt empowered enough, or stupid enough, to try and breach the barricaded doorway where the guard had a weapon drawn. Benedict Donald should be named on the suit as he was personally responsible for her being there and he was the one who empowered her with his steady stream of lies after losing the election months earlier.deadly force, against one unarmed woman, and none of the other cops felt the need to open fire.
And yet you probably think the SPLC is a noble organization still.
Nobody else felt empowered enough, or stupid enough, to try and breach the barricaded doorway where the guard had a weapon drawn. Benedict Donald should be named on the suit as he was personally responsible for her being there and he was the one who empowered her with his steady stream of lies after losing the election months earlier.
She’s the only one that jumped through the door. If she had stayed on the other side of the door, they wouldn’t have shot her.And yet they only shot her.
She’s the only one that jumped through the door. If she had stayed on the other side of the door, they wouldn’t have shot her.
Depends on the circumstances. This circumstance had a handful of police heavily outnumbered by dozens of rioters amid widespread violence across the capitol.Jumping through a window unarmed and in plain sight is now worthy of being shot by the police without any attempt to aprehend first?
Depends on the circumstances. This circumstance had a handful of police heavily outnumbered by dozens of rioters amid widespread violence across the capitol.
Cases involving use of force require considering all the facts and circumstances, not just focusing on the little parts you want to talk about.
SCOTUS said differently in the controlling precedent, Graham v Connor, but I guess you’re smarter than them.Actually deadly use of force rules don't depend on the circumstances, they were just ignored in this situation.
It's about time. If I was Judicial Watch I would aim higher. The black criminal ballot stuffers in Georgia sued for $150 million over hurt feelings. We're talking about murder here. Karma is coming back to Michael Byrd who has Ashli's blood on his hands.
SCOTUS said differently in the controlling precedent, Graham v Connor, but I guess you’re smarter than them.
Who was going to arrest her while still keeping the barricaded doorway guarded from the other rioters who would be streaming through the breach she tried to create?And they couldn't have just arrested her why?