Breaking! New York AG Letitia James Caught On Video Saying Judge Engoron Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)

[WorldWatcher]

Summaries are not a declaration of guilt from The Judge prior to any defense or prosecution .

I don't know what you mean by "summaries".

But yes a Summary Judgement by the Judge in the case is exactly a declaration of guilt (or in this civil case a ruling of liability). Both the claimant (AG) and respondent (Trump) requested Summary Judgement before trial.

It’s to indicate there are items that need further pursuit to determine if a guilty conclusion is warranted.
You use nice composition but your details are errant

You have it backwards, once a Summary Judgement is made there is no longer a trial needed. That is the opposite of what you just typed.

Now both parties requested Summary Judgement, however the Judge only ruled on 1 of the 7 claims. The other 6 are being determined at trial along with the amount of disgorgement for the claim where there was already a determination along with the status and amount for any other findings of liability.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Nevermind the fact that the bitch had to get the laws changed to even bring the case because they're attempting to use evidence that is past the statute of limitations.

Executive Law 63(13) has existed for decades and was not changed to allow this proceeding.

This crap case will be thrown out on appeal in any fair court in the land. But of course we're not dealing with a fair court, are we. This pedo judge was persuaded to take this case and he's agreeing with everything this racist bitch presents to him while rejecting every motion the defense makes.

You still haven't presented one document saying that Trump requested a summary judgement. Only this lying fuck pedo judge's responses.

It is a document, it's the ruling filed in court. Yes Virginia, that is a court document.

WW

 

[mudwhistle]

The lying on the legal documents submitted to the lenders and insurance carriers is the issue.

What the lenders or insurance companies did is irrelevant.

WW

No, that isn't the issue.
If nobody wants to file a complaint the issue is this oppressive AG and her ridiculous claims.
You're really going out in the weeds here.
This is just a case of a woman who ran her election on doing exactly this to Trump, a citizen of these United States, who has rights and protections under the Constitution that these communist bastards think he doesn't have.

 

[mudwhistle]

I don't know what you mean by "summaries".

But yes a Summary Judgement by the Judge in the case is exactly a declaration of guilt (or in this civil case a ruling of liability). Both the claimant (AG) and respondent (Trump) requested Summary Judgement before trial.




You have it backwards, once a Summary Judgement is made there is no longer a trial needed. That is the opposite of what you just typed.

Now both parties requested Summary Judgement, however the Judge only ruled on 1 of the 7 claims. The other 6 are being determined at trial along with the amount of disgorgement for the claim where there was already a determination along with the status and amount for any other findings of liability.

WW

And the Summary judgment was rejected by a higher court and put on hold till after the appeals process is completed.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No, that isn't the issue.

That is exactly the issue.

If nobody wants to file a complaint the issue is this oppressive AG and her ridiculous claims.
You're really going out in the weeds here.
This is just a case of a woman who ran her election on doing exactly this to Trump, a citizen of these United States, who has rights and protections under the Constitution that these communist bastards think he doesn't have.

Trump doesn't have a right to run his business in a fraudulent and illegal manner.

He does have rights and protections under the Constitution which is why his fraudulent and illegal actions are being air in open court with appropriate legal punishments involved. To protect his rights.

WW

 

[mudwhistle]

Executive Law 63(13) has existed for decades and was not changed to allow this proceeding.



It is a document, it's the ruling filed in court. Yes Virginia, that is a court document.

WW

So says you. Even the judge says that the statute of limitations has expired.....and he says he's allowing it anyway.

 

[WorldWatcher]

And the Summary judgment was rejected by a higher court and put on hold till after the appeals process is completed.

It wasn't "rejected" by the higher court.

It was stay pending completion of the trial and application of appeal, since part of the Judgement was suspension of his business certificate. There has been, and remains in place, a court order monitor to oversee Trump Organization transactions.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

So says you. Even the judge says that the statute of limitations has expired.....and he says he's allowing it anyway.

No he didn't. Statute of limitations goes back 10 years, which would be 2013. The charges against Trump go back to 2014, inside the SOL.

While the claims can only go back to 2014, prior history was admitted to show patterns of conduct.

WW

 

[Arlette]

No, that isn't the issue.
If nobody wants to file a complaint the issue is this oppressive AG and her ridiculous claims.
You're really going out in the weeds here.
This is just a case of a woman who ran her election on doing exactly this to Trump, a citizen of these United States, who has rights and protections under the Constitution that these communist bastards think he doesn't have.

The state will file charges against you if you beat up your wife for example. She doesn't have to be the plaintiff

 

[Arlette]

You need your medication adjusted.

You need to bring something to the discussion

 

[Concerned American]

Please show me proof of this, mkay?

I want to see the docs that shows that both parties asked for this judge to prejudge the case.

Show me the request in writing.

BTW, I think you're confusing the document trial with the New York case.

C'mon WW got his info from the shithouse lawyering school--it must be right. RME

 

[WEATHER53]

That is exactly the issue.



Trump doesn't have a right to run his business in a fraudulent and illegal manner.

He does have rights and protections under the Constitution which is why his fraudulent and illegal actions are being air in open court with appropriate legal punishments involved. To protect his rights.

WW

Giving his own opinion of the value of his non collateral non liened properties has utterly zero effect on loan approval nor is there fraudulent to cause illegality
You are simply unfamiliar with the commercial lending process but are Excellent at errant pearl clutching

 

[mudwhistle]

That is exactly the issue.



Trump doesn't have a right to run his business in a fraudulent and illegal manner.

He does have rights and protections under the Constitution which is why his fraudulent and illegal actions are being air in open court with appropriate legal punishments involved. To protect his rights.

WW

That's a matter of opinion. Whether or not he ran his business illegally is apparently going have to be up to higher courts.....because that pedo judge isn't going to use the law properly. He's making up laws as he goes along.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Holding Capitalists accountable for abusing the system

And judges will be held accountable for the bullshit they pull from the bench

 

[ColonelAngus]

This is the case that the judge claimed Mar a Lago is worth $18m and the bank said they did their due diligence and they love Trump and will continue to do business with him.

 

[Father O'Blivion]

This thread is classic. It sums up the cult nicely.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

This SCUM ASS NASTY Bitch needs to go to Prison herself!

 

[SeaMajor7]

This thread is classic. It sums up the cult nicely.

Congratulations, you just played yourself.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

She should be BANNED forever from the courts and lose her law license.

 

[WorldWatcher]

This is the case that the judge claimed Mar a Lago is worth $18m and the bank said they did their due diligence and they love Trump and will continue to do business with him.

No it's not, don't know what case you are referring to.

This is the case where the Judge mentioned that MAL has an assessed tax value of $18M in 2011 (true) and an assessed tax value of $27.6M in 2021 (also true). He did not claim those values were the "worth" of MAL.

WW