Yep, Washington DC, that’s where watergate was locatedWas Archibald Cox limited by geography?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, Washington DC, that’s where watergate was locatedWas Archibald Cox limited by geography?
Where does the appointment letter say that he can’t pursue any cases outside DC?Yep, Washington DC, that’s where watergate was located
Good t doesn’t, cause watergate was in dc, his investigation was limited to thatWhere does the appointment letter say that he can’t pursue any cases outside DC?
So Archibald Cox wasn’t limited to just DC. Gotcha.Good t doesn’t, cause watergate was in dc, his investigation was limited to that
But more over, he appeared with Richardson in front of the US Senate.
Jack never did
Sorry do you not know where watergate is located??So Archibald Cox wasn’t limited to just DC. Gotcha.
They’re the same.
Special counsel jurisdiction isn’t based on geography. It’s based on an issue.Sorry do you not know where watergate is located??
Haha no, again Cox appeared before the US Senate, with Richardson
Jack never did
More projection. You can't even argue against what he said, all you have is oh yeah.Better than being the Republican party of wanna-be fascists.
When did I admit that? He couldn’t. Watergate is literally in Washington DCSpecial counsel jurisdiction isn’t based on geography. It’s based on an issue.
You already admitted he could have prosecuted cases outside DC related to the issue.
This is the same.
What complete and utter nonsense, the truth is not divisive. Problem is you mamby pamby's can't handle the truth.The country has survived world wars, depressions, COVID, trump's first term...........and it will survive another if that happens. But we came out of his first presidency weaken by his divisiveness, incompetence, and constant chaos. He will weaken us again if elected. Hopefully not fatally.
Did the Senate vote to confirm Cox?When did I admit that? He couldn’t. Watergate is literally in Washington DC
Moreover, Cox appeared with Richardson in front of the US Senate
So again, they aren’t the same
Biden chose to drop out after he was convinced that he shouldn’t run again.More projection. You can't even argue against what he said, all you have is oh yeah.
Yes, when they confirmed Richardson his appointment was a conditionDid the Senate vote to confirm Cox?
Where does the constitution say that confirming one person counts as confirming a totally different person?Yes, when they confirmed Richardson his appointment was a condition
Convinced? He was convinced the day before he was till going to win. This was all orchestrated behind the scenes by Schumer, Piglosi, and Obummer. They want to pick who you vote for, they don't give a rip about democracy, they care about power, and Obummer's 4th term. Whose back his hand fits is who it will be so he can work them like a puppet.Biden chose to drop out after he was convinced that he shouldn’t run again.
It’s a little crazy, but nothing we can’t handle.
Honestly, it’s far better being a dem today than a few days ago. We get a new candidate and you’re still stuck with the wanna be fascist.
Everyone running for office says they’re going to win.Convinced? He was convinced the day before he was till going to win. This was all orchestrated behind the scenes by Schumer, Piglosi, and Obummer. They want to pick who you vote for, they don't give a rip about democracy, they care about power, and Obummer's 4th term. Whose back his hand fits is who it will be so he can work them like a puppet.
Who said that’s what happened?Where does the constitution say that confirming one person counts as confirming a totally different person?
You did because I asked if the Senate voted to confirm Cox and you said yes.Who said that’s what happened?
The Constitution doesn’t say they can’t confirm two people at once
Yes they did. They confirmed both.You did because I asked if the Senate voted to confirm Cox and you said yes.
Constitutuonally, Cox was never confirmed by the Senate.
False. The vote only confirmed Richardson who then appointed Cox with the same legal justification as when Jack Smith was appointed.Yes they did. They confirmed both.
You keep saying that but the facts show you are wrongFalse. The vote only confirmed Richardson who then appointed Cox with the same legal justification as when Jack Smith was appointed.