Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!. The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Scoot walked back the Scotts body and dropped the Taser beside him.
FACT! There was another PO standing beside Scott's body........remember? This officer also knew proper police procedure.
"Whatever you do don't tell anyone I tried to plant the Taser beside the body OK? We cops have to stick together right pal?" Ya fucking right. A PO is going to put his career, possibly his freedom on the line by agreeing to be part of evidence tamping?
Maybe in the movies but not in real life.
Seen it happen.Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!. The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Scoot walked back the Scotts body and dropped the Taser beside him.
FACT! There was another PO standing beside Scott's body........remember? This officer also knew proper police procedure.
"Whatever you do don't tell anyone I tried to plant the Taser beside the body OK? We cops have to stick together right pal?" Ya fucking right. A PO is going to put his career, possibly his freedom on the line by agreeing to be part of evidence tamping?
Maybe in the movies but not in real life.
Yeah libs believe that Hollywood shit. They think Training Day is realistic for 99% of all police.
Ask ANYONE who was actually a cop....will their department or mayor throw a lowly street cop under the bus to avoid lawsuits or bad press? IN LESS THAN A NANOSECOND!!!!
As I said: there's nothing I can do about your decision to believe something that is not true.Another "meaningful response"?I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that you chose to believe something that is not true - but there's nothing I can do about it.Your inability to coherently make your point (which, if I'm understanding it, is that if Slager's lawyer makes a good case, he'll get off) without revealing your bias in what you believe should "rightfully" happen is, as they say, not my problem.I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that you believe something that is not true, but "Presuming this is demonstratively plausible..." is not me saying that -I- believe is demonstrably plausible.You're the one making the argument - why would you base your argument on a presumption that you don't actually believe?Incorrect.
"Presuming this is demonstratively plausible..." does not me that -I- presume they are correct for anything other than the sake of argument.
Just like "this is demonstratively plausible..."
Your inability to comprehend this is your problem.
No, you're the poopy-headed poopy head!
Incapacitation of a police officer allows a criminal immediate access to the officer's firearm.There is but one remaining question: Is the attempted use of a taser a threat of serious bodily injury or death? Reasonable people may disagree on this issue but my personal opinion is that the it is not. My research has shown that the use of a taser poses no threat of death or serious bodily injury to a person in normally good health.
Incapacitation of a police officer allows a criminal immediate access to the officer's firearm.There is but one remaining question: Is the attempted use of a taser a threat of serious bodily injury or death? Reasonable people may disagree on this issue but my personal opinion is that the it is not. My research has shown that the use of a taser poses no threat of death or serious bodily injury to a person in normally good health.
This places the officer in a clear, present and immediate danger.
Thus, threatening a police officer with a taser gives the officer the right to use deadly force.
Nope dummy.
"I heard what his lawyer said, that's enough for me. He's clearly innocent, no need for a trial"
You lefties believed Mike Browns lawyer. Why not this one?
Must deflect! Must deflect! Must deflect!
Haha...deflect? Hardly. Just a footnote.
But Scott's DNA is on the taser. He had it. And 1 + 1 vs taser is a gun. SCOTUS allows it. His academy teaches it.
Or it was dropped next to his body after he was shot like the videos shows. All that DNA pouring out of the multiple gun shot wounds.
No fingerprints makes the revised account of slager's remarkably implausible
The DNA was not from blood. It was from sweat.
The Taser didn't creep over to the the dead thug's hand and rub itself in it.
Nope dummy.You lefties believed Mike Browns lawyer. Why not this one?
Must deflect! Must deflect! Must deflect!
Haha...deflect? Hardly. Just a footnote.
But Scott's DNA is on the taser. He had it. And 1 + 1 vs taser is a gun. SCOTUS allows it. His academy teaches it.
Or it was dropped next to his body after he was shot like the videos shows. All that DNA pouring out of the multiple gun shot wounds.
No fingerprints makes the revised account of slager's remarkably implausible
The DNA was not from blood. It was from sweat.
Says who?
The Taser didn't creep over to the the dead thug's hand and rub itself in it.
Who says that the DNA was from his hand? And if its from his hand, why are there no fingerprints from Scott on the taser?
Best not to think about that, eh?
Oh, and why didn't Slager's attorney argue today in Slager's bond hearing that Scott tried twice to use the taser against Slager? Did Slager's story change for a 4th time?
You're one more dumb-ass post away from getting PIed. I can't be bothered with your drivel.Nope dummy.You lefties believed Mike Browns lawyer. Why not this one?
Must deflect! Must deflect! Must deflect!
Haha...deflect? Hardly. Just a footnote.
But Scott's DNA is on the taser. He had it. And 1 + 1 vs taser is a gun. SCOTUS allows it. His academy teaches it.
Or it was dropped next to his body after he was shot like the videos shows. All that DNA pouring out of the multiple gun shot wounds.
No fingerprints makes the revised account of slager's remarkably implausible
The DNA was not from blood. It was from sweat.
Says who?
The Taser didn't creep over to the the dead thug's hand and rub itself in it.
Who says that the DNA was from his hand? And if its from his hand, why are there no fingerprints from Scott on the taser?
Best not to think about that, eh?
Oh, and why didn't Slager's attorney argue today in Slager's bond hearing that Scott tried twice to use the taser against Slager? Did Slager's story change for a 4th time?
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!.
The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
You're one more dumb-ass post away from getting PIed. I can't be bothered with your drivel.
As I already posted Scotts DNA was found on the Taser. It wasn't blood. It was sweat.
There were partial prints on the Taser put NONE.......even Slagers could be identified b/c of smudging.
Nope dummy.Must deflect! Must deflect! Must deflect!
Haha...deflect? Hardly. Just a footnote.
But Scott's DNA is on the taser. He had it. And 1 + 1 vs taser is a gun. SCOTUS allows it. His academy teaches it.
Or it was dropped next to his body after he was shot like the videos shows. All that DNA pouring out of the multiple gun shot wounds.
No fingerprints makes the revised account of slager's remarkably implausible
The DNA was not from blood. It was from sweat.
Says who?
The Taser didn't creep over to the the dead thug's hand and rub itself in it.
Who says that the DNA was from his hand? And if its from his hand, why are there no fingerprints from Scott on the taser?
Best not to think about that, eh?
Oh, and why didn't Slager's attorney argue today in Slager's bond hearing that Scott tried twice to use the taser against Slager? Did Slager's story change for a 4th time?
You have NO CLUE how fingerprints work...do you? You DO know that if they took Slager's Glock....they wouldn't have gotten a single fingerprint off of it...right?
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!.
That's not a 'fact'. That's not even alleged by anyone. You're just making this shit up as you go along.
Both cartridges of the taser had already been fired: at Scott. It was impossible for Scott to shoot Slager, even if he had the taser. Scott didn't have the taser. The taser was at the foot of officer Slager.
Scott was running from Slager without any taser. Slager shot him 8 times, shooting Scott everywhere from the ear to through his heart.
There were no taser barbs in Slager. There were no injuries consistent with Slager having had a taser used against him. Slager never says that the taser was used against him in any of the dispatch recordings, any incident report, any police report, or any report from any other officer responding on the scene.
So much for your 'fact'.
The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Not while the taser is at the officer's feet and the suspect is running away from him at a distance of 20 feet.
Your narrative is physically impossible under the circumstances of the shooting.
Think.
Oh, and I'm curious why Slager's attorney *didn't* argue in Slager's bond hearing that Scott tried to use the taser against Slager twice.
Did Slager's account change again?
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!.
That's not a 'fact'. That's not even alleged by anyone. You're just making this shit up as you go along.
Both cartridges of the taser had already been fired: at Scott. It was impossible for Scott to shoot Slager, even if he had the taser. Scott didn't have the taser. The taser was at the foot of officer Slager.
Scott was running from Slager without any taser. Slager shot him 8 times, shooting Scott everywhere from the ear to through his heart.
There were no taser barbs in Slager. There were no injuries consistent with Slager having had a taser used against him. Slager never says that the taser was used against him in any of the dispatch recordings, any incident report, any police report, or any report from any other officer responding on the scene.
So much for your 'fact'.
The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Not while the taser is at the officer's feet and the suspect is running away from him at a distance of 20 feet.
Your narrative is physically impossible under the circumstances of the shooting.
Think.
EXCEPT...that's not the taser at his feet. HERE is video of the taser....flying behind Slager...as Slager had both hands on his gun (so....who threw it????)
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!Slager's audio transmission said "He got my taser".
Scott took the taser. He was under arrest...just resisitng...and not cuffed. He had cocaine and alcohol in his system.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cops CAN use deadly force if...during an arrest...they are threatened with a weapon. Graham v. Connor. Slager's academy...like most...teach 1 + 1 force. 1 over what the suspect has. Taser + 1 = gun.
He's going free folks. Go ahead and get some popcorn for the riot.
He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!.
That's not a 'fact'. That's not even alleged by anyone. You're just making this shit up as you go along.
Both cartridges of the taser had already been fired: at Scott. It was impossible for Scott to shoot Slager, even if he had the taser. Scott didn't have the taser. The taser was at the foot of officer Slager.
Scott was running from Slager without any taser. Slager shot him 8 times, shooting Scott everywhere from the ear to through his heart.
There were no taser barbs in Slager. There were no injuries consistent with Slager having had a taser used against him. Slager never says that the taser was used against him in any of the dispatch recordings, any incident report, any police report, or any report from any other officer responding on the scene.
So much for your 'fact'.
The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Not while the taser is at the officer's feet and the suspect is running away from him at a distance of 20 feet.
Your narrative is physically impossible under the circumstances of the shooting.
Think.
EXCEPT...that's not the taser at his feet. HERE is video of the taser....flying behind Slager...as Slager had both hands on his gun (so....who threw it????)
You do realize that in your video the 'it' is already on the ground before Slager even draws his fire arm, right?
Oh, and I'm curious why Slager's attorney *didn't* argue in Slager's bond hearing that Scott tried to use the taser against Slager twice.
Did Slager's account change again?
Had nothing to do with his bond. And it's a bad tactic....he could've been cross examined by prosecutor...which would give her a glimpse of the defense so she could prep for it.
Facts that will free Slager:
*Update* Game Changer OR Paradigm Shift ? - Walter Scott Shooting: Enhanced Video Shows Officer Slager With Taser Darts...
Let's clear up a few fucking FACTS!He radioed that Scott had "taken his taser" after Scott was already dead - right about the same time he placed the taser next to Scott's body.
Scot was following his training to 'secure the scene' when he picked up the Taser the SCOTT HAD SHOT SLAGER WITH AS PROVEN IN THE VIDEO!!!!.
That's not a 'fact'. That's not even alleged by anyone. You're just making this shit up as you go along.
Both cartridges of the taser had already been fired: at Scott. It was impossible for Scott to shoot Slager, even if he had the taser. Scott didn't have the taser. The taser was at the foot of officer Slager.
Scott was running from Slager without any taser. Slager shot him 8 times, shooting Scott everywhere from the ear to through his heart.
There were no taser barbs in Slager. There were no injuries consistent with Slager having had a taser used against him. Slager never says that the taser was used against him in any of the dispatch recordings, any incident report, any police report, or any report from any other officer responding on the scene.
So much for your 'fact'.
The Taser was still capable of being used as a stun-gun. You think the Taser should sit on the ground where anyone could have picked it up? Wake up!
Not while the taser is at the officer's feet and the suspect is running away from him at a distance of 20 feet.
Your narrative is physically impossible under the circumstances of the shooting.
Think.
EXCEPT...that's not the taser at his feet. HERE is video of the taser....flying behind Slager...as Slager had both hands on his gun (so....who threw it????)
You do realize that in your video the 'it' is already on the ground before Slager even draws his fire arm, right?
Flying backwards as Slager draws his gun. Who threw it?
