BREAKING: North Korea Severs Communication Hotline With South Korea

They no longer think the Armistice is binding. Considering the Armistice is what secured the peace from the Korean war, so i think technically, we are back at war. Of course, the fact that they are saying it's not binding isnt significant, it's what they do now that matters. Personally, I hope we dont end up back at war.
 
Why did Dubya allow North Korea to develop nuclear weapons?

Hmm.. Of course in your mind it's all Dubya's fault except for the following facts:


Timeline: North Korea's nuclear weapons development​
July 17, 2003


A satellite photo shows North Korea's suspected nuclear facility at Yongbyon.


Chronology of nuclear weapons development in North Korea:

1993: North Korea says it has quit the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty amid suspicions that it is developing nuclear weapons. It later reverses that decision.

1994: North Korea and U.S. sign an agreement. North Korea pledges to freeze and eventually dismantle its nuclear weapons program in exchange for international aid to build two power-producing nuclear reactors.

Aug. 31, 1998: North Korea fires a multistage over Japan and into the Pacific Ocean, proving it can strike any part of Japan's territory.

May 25-28, 1999: Former Defense Secretary William Perry visits North Korea and delivers a U.S. disarmament proposal.

Sept. 13: North Korea pledges to freeze long-range missile tests.

Sept. 17: U.S. President Bill Clinton eases economic sanctions against North Korea.

December: A U.S.-led consortium signs a US$4.6 billion contract for two safer, Western-developed light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea.

July 2000: North Korea again threatens to restart its nuclear program if Washington doesn't compensate for the loss of electricity caused by delays in building nuclear power plants.

Read more:
CNN.com - Timeline: North Korea's nuclear weapons development - Jul. 17, 2003
 
What are the differences between N.K. bombs and Iranian ones? Is Israel more important to the US than S.K.?
 
They no longer think the Armistice is binding. Considering the Armistice is what secured the peace from the Korean war, so i think technically, we are back at war.


Technically, we have been all along.
 
They consider Isreal more important to mideast "peace" than S.Korea to Asian "peace." I guess it's because the mideast has more valuable resources.
 
They consider Isreal more important to mideast "peace" than S.Korea to Asian "peace." I guess it's because the mideast has more valuable resources.

It is to be hoped religion has nothing to do with it (first amendment and all that).
 
What are the differences between N.K. bombs and Iranian ones? Is Israel more important to the US than S.K.?

NK bombs don't work, Iranian bombs don't exist.

Yes.

Any elaboration on 'Yes' might be interesting. What does America have to gain in each situation and how does that add up to Israel being more important?

The Zionists control the banks.

All the Koreans have are dry cleaners...

That's why we get all upset when Israel gets upset.
 
Oh, you're an anti-Semite too? You just keep revealing new depths to your depravity, don't you? What a fucking low-life scum bag. Are you going to say you are serious that Koreans have nothing but dry cleaners next? You are a complete failure of a human being, you hateful piece of shit.
 
Oh, you're an anti-Semite too? You just keep revealing new depths to your depravity, don't you? What a fucking low-life scum bag. Are you going to say you are serious that Koreans have nothing but dry cleaners next? You are a complete failure of a human being, you hateful piece of shit.

Hey, guy, just pointing out the obvious...

We just had a distinguished senator held up from appointment for weeks because he didn't bow down before the Altar of Zionism that Israel's interests are more important than Americas...

But keep telling yourself Tel Aviv isn't running the show.

It's not like your coward ass is going to be anywhere near a war zone...
 
It isn't anti-Israeli to not be pro. It is just another country to America. Stability and prosperity in Asia is in America's interests. It is not clear why there is such a dramatic difference in the two cases of N. K. and Iran.
 
It isn't anti-Israeli to not be pro. It is just another country to America. Stability and prosperity in Asia is in America's interests. It is not clear why there is such a dramatic difference in the two cases of N. K. and Iran.


Are you really that stupid?
 

Forum List

Back
Top