BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

Actually Seth Rich and three other people died mysteriously in the same month. A couple of DNC operatives and I believe two authors who were writing Novels about The Clinton's Mile high pile of Corruption and I'll Gotten Gains.

Speaking of that. Where The Fuck did they squirrel away Anthony Wieimer and Guccifer?

I'd say Clinton and Podesta as well since Obama was Illegally Sharing Classified Information with her!

Probably Susan Rice and Evelyn Farkas for starters
Rice, Clapper, Brennan, and Obama.. Obama had to make the final decision on this.
And you wondered why the DNC did not want the FBI to have access to their servers..

That and they didn't want the FBI to find who at the DNC sanctioned the hit on Seth Rich

Another one, McGill, was just found dead. He was to appear before Trey Gowdy's congressional committee. He was found by Huma Abedin.

Not at all suspicious, now is it?
 
Last edited:
They are more concerned about Fake News and ignoring "Incidental" Surveillance!

When we have our next terrorist attack on our soil, we now KNOW what Trump's National Security Council was doing to help keep us safe...researching anything intelligence communities had on trump and Trumpsters in the Russian investigation.... :rolleyes:

Is it LEGAL for Trump and Trumpsters trying to find any classified information the govt has on them when the government has them under an official (Criminal) Investigation?

One was just stopped last month by the FBI, a plan to bomb trains and buses on behalf of ISIS. I'm sure most people missed it.

MSM was too busy rabidly focusing on Trump and trying to spread fake news and conspiracies


It made a local news paper where the arrest took place and UK news. How could the nation have missed that? ;-)
 
Rice, Clapper, Brennan, and Obama.. Obama had to make the final decision on this.

Not at all. Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama would be protected at all cost. NO formal approval had to be passed from one to another. Susan Rice had already proven herself to be willing to take a "bullet" for the President, in fact, "FIVE BULLETS" all on one Sunday. They knew she would take a "bullet" again and see that the job was done. If it came out, she would again bite the bullet for the organization.
 
WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

Specifically, what is "ALL THE TIME" mean? More importantly, if nothing illegal was discussed, what difference does it make? Russia is one of our major enemies and with a new administration coming on board, numerous conversations had to occur. Had they not, the desperate Progressives would have been screaming that Donald Trump and his team were NOT doing their job.
 
Rice, Clapper, Brennan, and Obama.. Obama had to make the final decision on this.

Not at all. Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama would be protected at all cost. NO formal approval had to be passed from one to another. Susan Rice had already proven herself to be willing to take a "bullet" for the President, in fact, "FIVE BULLETS" all on one Sunday. They knew she would take a "bullet" again and see that the job was done. If it came out, she would again bite the bullet for the organization.


Maybe Rice is a closet Lesbo? Can't wait to get into prison....you know what I am saying?
Break out the breath mints. She looks like she has a little bit of Mississippi leg-hound in her.
Put her, Beast and Huma in the same cell. Let them tell each other how great Obama was for 30 years.
Make it a reality TV show. Ratings through the roof.
 
When asked about surveillance of Trump and his people, Rice denied knowing anything about it. It's on tape: Mark Levin audio Rewind 4/3/17

But we all know she's a serial liar and still lying.
 
WE now have evidence that there was both legal and illegal surveillance by the Obama administration.

For over a year there was illegal surveillance that had noting to do with Russia.. Since July of last year the legal incidental surveillance was also done.

Rice demanded the unmasking of Trump and his associates. She then had the transcripts of conversations sent out to senior Obama staff and included John Podesta and Farkas in the Clinton campaign because they retained their security clearances.

Rice did not have a warrant to do what she did. So all of what she did was illegal, Reverse targeting Trump and his team.

It was clearly political espionage using US government intelligence assets.

This makes Watergate look like kids play.
LOLOL

You moron, Rice didn't need a warrant. And where's your proof that Farkas retained her security clearance?
 
WE now have evidence that there was both legal and illegal surveillance by the Obama administration.

For over a year there was illegal surveillance that had noting to do with Russia.. Since July of last year the legal incidental surveillance was also done.

Rice demanded the unmasking of Trump and his associates. She then had the transcripts of conversations sent out to senior Obama staff and included John Podesta and Farkas in the Clinton campaign because they retained their security clearances.

Rice did not have a warrant to do what she did. So all of what she did was illegal, Reverse targeting Trump and his team.

It was clearly political espionage using US government intelligence assets.

This makes Watergate look like kids play.
LOLOL

You moron, Rice didn't need a warrant. And where's your proof that Farkas retained her security clearance?


She spoke on MSNBC about it
 
Rice seems honest.

She's never lied on national television many times. Absolutely never....many times.
 
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?

It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.

And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.

I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.

Now those lies are going to sink you.

Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,

BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....

THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.

NO.. they were not unmasked legally. It is a violation of several laws and the Fourth Amendment.
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....

These two things are tied together...that whole Charade that Nunes called last week where he went to the whitehouse to get info then went home, then went back to the whitehouse to tell Trump after a few press conferences before and after.... with his convoluted statements and cloak and dagger actions...

is this information leaked today, by the NSC guy, who is 1 of the guys that was outed that met with Nunes and showed Nunes this classified information.

That whole thing was utterly ridiculous because there was no way the NSC guy who works for the President would give this info to Nunes, without showing the President first, so Nunes going back to the whitehouse to brief the President as if the President didn't know and was not behind this whole fiasco in the first place.... so Trump was playing all of us, using Nunes and ruining Nunes's career over it....

There is NOTHING illegal in what rice did and according to EVERYONE in intelligence community, this is common practice in investigations on foreignrs IF the uscit's identity is necessary to understanding the foreign intelligence being collected.

AND might I say, we do not know if these Trumpsters were unmasked from conversations they had with the Foreign agents, or it could simply be two foreign agents discussing Trump and Trumpsters with each other....but we do know, somehow they ARE INVOLVED with whatever the intel community is investigating.

there is a paper trail, showing the legal means of the unmasking....Trump can get that, if he wants it....instead he wants to distract from the ACTUAL INVESTIGATION on the Russian interference,

and WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

for goodness sake, what is going on with all of these Russian connections?

He just sent all of you on some wild goose chase,
that ends with everything being perfectly legal,
none of the info unmasked ever leaked,
and the Trumpsters involved being in deep do do.

Susan Rice did what you call reverse targeting. This requires a warrant.. She unmasked phone conversation that had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA and many were with other US CITIZENS.. This violates so many laws it would take me weeks just to name them all.

The bombshell today exposes illegal surveillance and the gross illegal misuse of legal surveillance that requires a warrant.

Rice is going to jail and so are about 10 other people at the top. There isn't a thing legal about what she did.. Then she distributed it.. The leakers are about to have a very bad 30 years..
More unadulterated bullshit. You have no proof Rice distributed anything. Hell, you can't even prove Rice had Flynn's name unmasked.
 
If you're hanging around Russians--you can bet you're being watched also, especially when there is a lot of contact between you and the Russians going on, and especially in the middle of a campaign season. (Russians can't vote, and they sure has hell can't make campaign donations.)

Why then could the Russians make massive contributions to the Clintons and John Podesta?

Former Clinton Campaign Manager John Podesta’s Big Money Connection to Russia
Posted on April 3, 2017 by Benjamin Knight in Politics

As the media promulgates its McCarthyite Russian conspiracy alleging that President Donald Trump and his confidants are somehow beholden to Russia, fake leftist news outlets are ignoring the very real big money connection between the Kremlin and Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager John Podesta.

Podesta may have violated federal law when he failed to disclose his stocks in a Kremlin-funded company that transferred $35 million to a company he sat on the board of called Joule Energy, according to the notorious author of “Clinton Cash” Peter Schweizer.

The Breitbart editor essentially revealed that the Russian government invested in Podesta’s business in 2011 while he advised then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Podesta failed to disclose not only his 75,000 shares of stock in Joule Energy but also his membership with the company board.

This not only constitutes a violation of disclosure rules but it also proves Clinton’s former campaign head is linked to the Russian government. Yet, former National Security adviser Gen. Mike Flynn’s routine phone conversation with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak sparked a national controversy. This is an obvious double standard.

Hillary herself sold 20% of America’s uranium supply to Russia in exchange for over $150 million in Clinton Foundation donations, but you’re not supposed to know that.

The Trump-Russia narrative is a clear case of projection from the corrupt political and media establishment. They know there is no evidence to substantiate their conspiratorial nonsense, so they are blatantly lying to delegitimize Trump’s election victory while hoping the general public is too stupid to verify their claims.

Read more? Former Clinton Campaign Manager John Podesta’s Big Money Connection to Russia
 
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.

And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.

I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.

Now those lies are going to sink you.

Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,

BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....

THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.

NO.. they were not unmasked legally. It is a violation of several laws and the Fourth Amendment.
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....

These two things are tied together...that whole Charade that Nunes called last week where he went to the whitehouse to get info then went home, then went back to the whitehouse to tell Trump after a few press conferences before and after.... with his convoluted statements and cloak and dagger actions...

is this information leaked today, by the NSC guy, who is 1 of the guys that was outed that met with Nunes and showed Nunes this classified information.

That whole thing was utterly ridiculous because there was no way the NSC guy who works for the President would give this info to Nunes, without showing the President first, so Nunes going back to the whitehouse to brief the President as if the President didn't know and was not behind this whole fiasco in the first place.... so Trump was playing all of us, using Nunes and ruining Nunes's career over it....

There is NOTHING illegal in what rice did and according to EVERYONE in intelligence community, this is common practice in investigations on foreignrs IF the uscit's identity is necessary to understanding the foreign intelligence being collected.

AND might I say, we do not know if these Trumpsters were unmasked from conversations they had with the Foreign agents, or it could simply be two foreign agents discussing Trump and Trumpsters with each other....but we do know, somehow they ARE INVOLVED with whatever the intel community is investigating.

there is a paper trail, showing the legal means of the unmasking....Trump can get that, if he wants it....instead he wants to distract from the ACTUAL INVESTIGATION on the Russian interference,

and WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

for goodness sake, what is going on with all of these Russian connections?

He just sent all of you on some wild goose chase,
that ends with everything being perfectly legal,
none of the info unmasked ever leaked,
and the Trumpsters involved being in deep do do.

Susan Rice did what you call reverse targeting. This requires a warrant.. She unmasked phone conversation that had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA and many were with other US CITIZENS.. This violates so many laws it would take me weeks just to name them all.

The bombshell today exposes illegal surveillance and the gross illegal misuse of legal surveillance that requires a warrant.

Rice is going to jail and so are about 10 other people at the top. There isn't a thing legal about what she did.. Then she distributed it.. The leakers are about to have a very bad 30 years..
More unadulterated bullshit. You have no proof Rice distributed anything. Hell, you can't even prove Rice had Flynn's name unmasked.


>>White House lawyers last month discovered that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.<<
 
Benghazi was a spontaneous protest about a youtube trailer for a movie that had not even been completed.

That's what Susan Rice said.
Why wouldn't she say that? That's what our intelligence community believed and conveyed to the White House and State Department.

Didn't Hillary already e-mail Chelsea the truth before Susan went on TV and lied?
Yes, the night of the attacks when intel kept shifting and before our intelligence community determined it was a protest spurred from that video.
 
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,

BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....

THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.

NO.. they were not unmasked legally. It is a violation of several laws and the Fourth Amendment.
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....

These two things are tied together...that whole Charade that Nunes called last week where he went to the whitehouse to get info then went home, then went back to the whitehouse to tell Trump after a few press conferences before and after.... with his convoluted statements and cloak and dagger actions...

is this information leaked today, by the NSC guy, who is 1 of the guys that was outed that met with Nunes and showed Nunes this classified information.

That whole thing was utterly ridiculous because there was no way the NSC guy who works for the President would give this info to Nunes, without showing the President first, so Nunes going back to the whitehouse to brief the President as if the President didn't know and was not behind this whole fiasco in the first place.... so Trump was playing all of us, using Nunes and ruining Nunes's career over it....

There is NOTHING illegal in what rice did and according to EVERYONE in intelligence community, this is common practice in investigations on foreignrs IF the uscit's identity is necessary to understanding the foreign intelligence being collected.

AND might I say, we do not know if these Trumpsters were unmasked from conversations they had with the Foreign agents, or it could simply be two foreign agents discussing Trump and Trumpsters with each other....but we do know, somehow they ARE INVOLVED with whatever the intel community is investigating.

there is a paper trail, showing the legal means of the unmasking....Trump can get that, if he wants it....instead he wants to distract from the ACTUAL INVESTIGATION on the Russian interference,

and WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

for goodness sake, what is going on with all of these Russian connections?

He just sent all of you on some wild goose chase,
that ends with everything being perfectly legal,
none of the info unmasked ever leaked,
and the Trumpsters involved being in deep do do.

Susan Rice did what you call reverse targeting. This requires a warrant.. She unmasked phone conversation that had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA and many were with other US CITIZENS.. This violates so many laws it would take me weeks just to name them all.

The bombshell today exposes illegal surveillance and the gross illegal misuse of legal surveillance that requires a warrant.

Rice is going to jail and so are about 10 other people at the top. There isn't a thing legal about what she did.. Then she distributed it.. The leakers are about to have a very bad 30 years..
More unadulterated bullshit. You have no proof Rice distributed anything. Hell, you can't even prove Rice had Flynn's name unmasked.


>>White House lawyers last month discovered that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.<<
Great, now show me where that includes she had Flynn's name unmasked. I'm not saying she didn't, mind you; but I am saying there's been no evidence released that she did.
 
Needless to say, I'm a hardcore Conservative.

Given that, I would sincerely advise the far left Progressives to keep their powder dry. This whole thing is blowing up in their faces. Maybe they don't even realize the depth to which petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama would and will go to protect his work.
 
NO.. they were not unmasked legally. It is a violation of several laws and the Fourth Amendment.
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....

These two things are tied together...that whole Charade that Nunes called last week where he went to the whitehouse to get info then went home, then went back to the whitehouse to tell Trump after a few press conferences before and after.... with his convoluted statements and cloak and dagger actions...

is this information leaked today, by the NSC guy, who is 1 of the guys that was outed that met with Nunes and showed Nunes this classified information.

That whole thing was utterly ridiculous because there was no way the NSC guy who works for the President would give this info to Nunes, without showing the President first, so Nunes going back to the whitehouse to brief the President as if the President didn't know and was not behind this whole fiasco in the first place.... so Trump was playing all of us, using Nunes and ruining Nunes's career over it....

There is NOTHING illegal in what rice did and according to EVERYONE in intelligence community, this is common practice in investigations on foreignrs IF the uscit's identity is necessary to understanding the foreign intelligence being collected.

AND might I say, we do not know if these Trumpsters were unmasked from conversations they had with the Foreign agents, or it could simply be two foreign agents discussing Trump and Trumpsters with each other....but we do know, somehow they ARE INVOLVED with whatever the intel community is investigating.

there is a paper trail, showing the legal means of the unmasking....Trump can get that, if he wants it....instead he wants to distract from the ACTUAL INVESTIGATION on the Russian interference,

and WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

for goodness sake, what is going on with all of these Russian connections?

He just sent all of you on some wild goose chase,
that ends with everything being perfectly legal,
none of the info unmasked ever leaked,
and the Trumpsters involved being in deep do do.

Susan Rice did what you call reverse targeting. This requires a warrant.. She unmasked phone conversation that had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA and many were with other US CITIZENS.. This violates so many laws it would take me weeks just to name them all.

The bombshell today exposes illegal surveillance and the gross illegal misuse of legal surveillance that requires a warrant.

Rice is going to jail and so are about 10 other people at the top. There isn't a thing legal about what she did.. Then she distributed it.. The leakers are about to have a very bad 30 years..
More unadulterated bullshit. You have no proof Rice distributed anything. Hell, you can't even prove Rice had Flynn's name unmasked.


>>White House lawyers last month discovered that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.<<
Great, now show me where that includes she had Flynn's name unmasked. I'm not saying she didn't, mind you; but I am saying there's been no evidence released that she did.


Sources: Susan Rice behind unmasking of Trump officials - WND.com
www.wnd.com/2017/04/sources-susan-rice-behind-unmasking-of-trump-officials/
12 hours ago - Sources: Susan Rice behind unmasking of Trump officials .... (Flynn resigned after his unmasking was leaked to the press as part of reports that ...
Obama's national security advisor ASKED for 'unmasking' | Daily Mail ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../Obama-s-national-security-advisor-ASKED-unmasking.ht...
13 hours ago - Former national security advisor Susan Rice asked dozens of times for the ... Advisor Mike Flynn – were subsequently leaked and made public.
Susan Rice tried to 'unmask' Trump associates in intelligence reports ...
nypost.com/2017/.../susan-rice-tried-to-unmask-trump-associates-in-intelligence-repor...
13 hours ago - Former President Obama's national security adviser SusanRice ... of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of Americans ... Pablo Escobar's Right-Hand Man Admits He'll 'Always Be a Killer'Foxnews.com.
BOMBSHELL: Obama Security Advisor Susan Rice Requested Trump ...
BOMBSHELL: Obama Security Advisor Susan Rice Requested Trump Associates "Unmasked" For Political Purposes...
14 hours ago - Susan Rice, the former U.S. National Security Advisor under Barack Obama, ... “Michael Flynn was unmasked and then illegally his identify was ...
 
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....

These two things are tied together...that whole Charade that Nunes called last week where he went to the whitehouse to get info then went home, then went back to the whitehouse to tell Trump after a few press conferences before and after.... with his convoluted statements and cloak and dagger actions...

is this information leaked today, by the NSC guy, who is 1 of the guys that was outed that met with Nunes and showed Nunes this classified information.

That whole thing was utterly ridiculous because there was no way the NSC guy who works for the President would give this info to Nunes, without showing the President first, so Nunes going back to the whitehouse to brief the President as if the President didn't know and was not behind this whole fiasco in the first place.... so Trump was playing all of us, using Nunes and ruining Nunes's career over it....

There is NOTHING illegal in what rice did and according to EVERYONE in intelligence community, this is common practice in investigations on foreignrs IF the uscit's identity is necessary to understanding the foreign intelligence being collected.

AND might I say, we do not know if these Trumpsters were unmasked from conversations they had with the Foreign agents, or it could simply be two foreign agents discussing Trump and Trumpsters with each other....but we do know, somehow they ARE INVOLVED with whatever the intel community is investigating.

there is a paper trail, showing the legal means of the unmasking....Trump can get that, if he wants it....instead he wants to distract from the ACTUAL INVESTIGATION on the Russian interference,

and WHAT THE HECK were his people meeting with the Russians or talking to the Russian spies ALL THE TIME for...?

for goodness sake, what is going on with all of these Russian connections?

He just sent all of you on some wild goose chase,
that ends with everything being perfectly legal,
none of the info unmasked ever leaked,
and the Trumpsters involved being in deep do do.

Susan Rice did what you call reverse targeting. This requires a warrant.. She unmasked phone conversation that had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA and many were with other US CITIZENS.. This violates so many laws it would take me weeks just to name them all.

The bombshell today exposes illegal surveillance and the gross illegal misuse of legal surveillance that requires a warrant.

Rice is going to jail and so are about 10 other people at the top. There isn't a thing legal about what she did.. Then she distributed it.. The leakers are about to have a very bad 30 years..
More unadulterated bullshit. You have no proof Rice distributed anything. Hell, you can't even prove Rice had Flynn's name unmasked.


>>White House lawyers last month discovered that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.<<
Great, now show me where that includes she had Flynn's name unmasked. I'm not saying she didn't, mind you; but I am saying there's been no evidence released that she did.


Sources: Susan Rice behind unmasking of Trump officials - WND.com
www.wnd.com/2017/04/sources-susan-rice-behind-unmasking-of-trump-officials/
12 hours ago - Sources: Susan Rice behind unmasking of Trump officials .... (Flynn resigned after his unmasking was leaked to the press as part of reports that ...
Obama's national security advisor ASKED for 'unmasking' | Daily Mail ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../Obama-s-national-security-advisor-ASKED-unmasking.ht...
13 hours ago - Former national security advisor Susan Rice asked dozens of times for the ... Advisor Mike Flynn – were subsequently leaked and made public.
Susan Rice tried to 'unmask' Trump associates in intelligence reports ...
nypost.com/2017/.../susan-rice-tried-to-unmask-trump-associates-in-intelligence-repor...
13 hours ago - Former President Obama's national security adviser SusanRice ... of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of Americans ... Pablo Escobar's Right-Hand Man Admits He'll 'Always Be a Killer'Foxnews.com.
BOMBSHELL: Obama Security Advisor Susan Rice Requested Trump ...
BOMBSHELL: Obama Security Advisor Susan Rice Requested Trump Associates "Unmasked" For Political Purposes...
14 hours ago - Susan Rice, the former U.S. National Security Advisor under Barack Obama, ... “Michael Flynn was unmasked and then illegally his identify was ...
OP- Total bs, of course she did, nothing illegal or improper, and never given to the press, unlike Comey's bs and Putin's hacking that threw the election. DUHHHHHHH.
 

Forum List

Back
Top