aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,687
It is unprecedented for a sitting President to commit Espionage on an Incoming President!
WTF? Lefty sees nothing wrong with this?
Rice could NOT UNMASK THEM, she can only request that they are unmasked from the head of the Intel Agency that collected the surveillance of information in the first place, and on that request, by law, you have to give the Agency head reasons why the unmasking is critical or pertinent to understanding the foreign intelligence collected....As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
I repeat, Rice does not make that decision, Rice can not unmask them on her own..
In mid October when the public was told about the Russian Interference again with 17 Intelligence agencies stating so, Obama announced that he asked for a comprehensive investigation tying all the information together from their investigations such far and continuing. A week before President Trump's inauguration he and Obama were briefed by the intelligence community on what they found, the classified version, and we were informed of the unclassified version of their analysis.
The election was only2 to 3 weeks after Obama asked for this one consolidated investigative report ...and it would make sense that the investigation with all hands on deck, were heavily involved in trying to have this analysis done before Obama left office...And from beginning near the election period end thru right before his departure.