Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LINK TO THIS BULL CRAP, pretty pleaseWE now have evidence that there was both legal and illegal surveillance by the Obama administration.
For over a year there was illegal surveillance that had noting to do with Russia.. Since July of last year the legal incidental surveillance was also done.
Rice demanded the unmasking of Trump and his associates. She then had the transcripts of conversations sent out to senior Obama staff and included John Podesta and Farkas in the Clinton campaign because they retained their security clearances.
Rice did not have a warrant to do what she did. So all of what she did was illegal, Reverse targeting Trump and his team.
It was clearly political espionage using US government intelligence assets.
This makes Watergate look like kids play.
How did your twisted mind come to that conclusion?So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Well lets show you just how retarded you are..
Did she have a warrant to do so?
The answer is NO.. SO the unmasking was illegal especially when she then had it distributed to over thirty people to include Hillary Clinton's staff.
She could not act alone. She had to have permission from at least three people.I seriously doubt she acted alone.This is interesting and lends credence to the claim that Susan is indeed the culprit...
White House logs indicate Susan Rice consumed unmasked intel on Trump associates
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....
THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Well lets show you just how retarded you are..
Did she have a warrant to do so?
The answer is NO.. SO the unmasking was illegal especially when she then had it distributed to over thirty people to include Hillary Clinton's staff.
>>Susan Rice requested dozens of times for anonymous U.S. persons featured in intelligence reports and connected to Donald Trump to be “unmasked”<<
>>intelligence reports that Rice was seeking to unmask contained “valuable political information” about the Trump transition<<
This was not about national security. This was about Trump. She had no business unmasking any of it.
Obama didn't spy on Trump. Don't make things up.
As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,
BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....
THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.
Rice could NOT UNMASK THEM, she can only request that they are unmasked from the head of the Intel Agency that collected the surveillance of information in the first place, and on that request, by law, you have to give the Agency head reasons why the unmasking is critical or pertinent to understanding the foreign intelligence collected....As reported in a separate thread, Bloomberg News broke the news that Susan Rice requested to learn the identity of people communicating with Russian agents, and these people turned out to be Trump associates. Not reported in said separate thread is this:
Excerpt:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Susan Rice Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel
Here is the name of the shitty thread for reference: BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials
The requests were within 'The Law'. You can phucking request anything you want.
But actually fulfilling them without the proper authorization in writing and declassifying the documents is a Felony.
None of the Unmasking that was done had the accompanying authorization, and none of The Surveillance was declassified.
If they were authorized we would know who exactly authorized it. Where the order came from, and who signed it.
Each account of unmasking without the proper authorization in writing and the order to declassify the surveillance is the commission of 3....count them....3 felonies.
So, I'd like to know just how many Acts of Unmasking Were Committed.
I am thinking there is enough to put anyone who did it away for life.
Even though Rice unmasked them, none of information should ever have been made public. It is still for intel eyes only.
That it increases after the election was purely political and Obama and Rice should both face charges
I repeat, Rice does not make that decision, Rice can not unmask them on her own..
In mid October when the public was told about the Russian Interference again with 17 Intelligence agencies stating so, Obama announced that he asked for a comprehensive investigation tying all the information together from their investigations such far and continuing. A week before President Trump's inauguration he and Obama were briefed by the intelligence community on what they found, the classified version, and we were informed of the unclassified version of their analysis.
The election was only2 to 3 weeks after Obama asked for this one consolidated investigative report ...and it would make sense that the investigation with all hands on deck, were heavily involved in trying to have this analysis done before Obama left office...And from beginning near the election period end thru right before his departure.
How do you know that? Even Nunes said it was all legal....there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....
THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.
NO.. they were not unmasked legally. It is a violation of several laws and the Fourth Amendment.
there was no lie, they were unmasked LEGALLY,
BECAUSE they were involved with the foreigners being watched and the unmasking was pertinent to understanding the intelligence of the conversations being made by the foreigners....
THAT MEANS, Trump's boys, could be in TROUBLE or in the least, much more involved with the Foreign agent operatives being surveillanced than simply saying hi.
The unmasking only BEGAN AFTER Donald Trump won the Republican presidential nomination.
This is much larger than you want anyone to believe and I understand you will do anything in your desperate effort to deflect attention from this trainwreck.
Good luck! You need it.
