Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 80,987
- 2,635
Great, so how does that render a warrant, "illegal?"Why would a FISA warrant against the Russian ambassador be illegal?
Not talking about that one. I am talking about the one that was being used against trump. The unmasking that was going on by the obama admin tells me they had a tap going on trump tower. Good luck justifying that one.
"The unmasking that was going on by the Obama admin tells me they had a tap going on Trump tower"
That sentence doesn't make sense. It looks like a pile of buzzwords without substance.
How would the "unmasking" tell you that Trump tower was tapped?
As for the surveillance that trapped Flynn in his lie - he was on the phone with the Russian Ambassador. It's a pretty safe bet that the target of the surveillance was the Russian, and not Flynn.
Then you didn't read and understand what I said. While obama was still in office there was a flurry of unmasking going on. All of it designed to harm the trump campaign. How did the obama admin get the information that allowed them to do the unmasking? As far as flynns case go's. How do you know? None of that has been released. You and I simply have way of knowing how any of muellers case was built.
My speculation is based on several decades of work in the Court system. But that is all it is, speculation.
What do you mean when you say "unmasking"?
Perhaps we're using different definitions of the word.
The obama admin was releasing the names of Americans "caught" up in the various surveillance programs they had going. That is "unmasking".
If half of what has been reported is true, then the info they used against flynn was most likely obtained via the illegal FISA warrant. If that is indeed factual, flynn walks.