BREAKING! Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

Election deniers is a little broad, you should narrow it down. Trump said Biden didn't win in 2020. In 2016 just about every democrat said trump didn't win, he had the Russians help him win, he was a illegitimate president and so on.

Since democrats had more people deny trump than republicans denied Biden I am assuming you mean them.
LOL

those dumbasses think they just say anything

and we will actually believe it.. or some will anyhow.. But they don't even have SOME voting for them anymore.. hence the chaos at the border.. new voters arriving just in time for the 24 election
 
Her off the cuff statements, years later in interviews pale in comparison to the incitement the Orange Fascist GodHead used immediately during the count and after his loss was announced in Nov. 2020.

But feel free to try another false equivalence.
Zzzz

She was an election denier after her polite little concession speech.

Beyond that, you have nothing of merit to say. Bye.
 
It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.

~~~~~~
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunson v. Adams​

**********​


Commentary:
The media has been totally absent on this pending case.
Will the Justices of the Supreme Court of the U.S. poke the Maoist Democrat bear with a sharp pointed stick after nearly two years?
It's obvious that those Justices appointed by Barry Soetoro and Joey Xi Bai Dung will vote against this case.
Reading the article, which BTW by Tim Canova was well written, shows to me that the Supreme Court is interested in the case for a number of reasons. Number one, their own self preservation. Imagine that.
"The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military."
Members of violated their oath of office by not investigating the serious allegations of election rigging.
High Treason.
The question today put simply. Is the power of SCOTUS in a Maoist Democrat Communist controlled Executive office be allowed to decide the fraudulency of the 2020 election.
Will Bai Dung suspend SCOTUS as the SOP for all Commie controlled countries and replace them with more pliant judges? Just as Joey;s friend Maduro and has done?
 
Last edited:
It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.


Any day now! It's gonna happpen! I swear!

(Please send money to TrumpPAC/MyPillowGuyPAC)
 
~~~~~~
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunson v. Adams​

**********​


Commentary:
The media is totally absent silent on this pending case.
Will the Justices of the Supreme Court of the U.S. poke the Maoist Democrat bear wit a sharp pointed stick after nearly two years?
It's obvious that those Justices appointed by Barry Soetoro and Joey Xi Bai Dung.
Reading the article, which BTW was well written, shows to me that the Supreme Court is interested in the case for a number of reasons. One: their own self preservation. Imagine that.
"The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military."
Members of violated their oath of office by not investigating the serious allegations of election rigging.
High Treason.
The question today is simply, is the power of SCOTUS in a Maoist Democrat Communist country allowed by the Executive.
Will Bai Dun dissolve SCOTUS as been done in all Commie controlled countries and replaced with more pliant judges?
This post is rated retarded.jpg
 
So understand what the article actually says.

A few Trumptard loons whose suit was rejected in the lower courts that is being held up by the appellate court filed it at the Supreme Court asking for it to be heard even though the appellate court has not. Anyone can do this for any reason.

And this makes "news" on loon sites like The Gateway Pundit.

Because you gotta keep telling the snowflakes what they desperately want to hear.

Keep clicking and sending, Trumptards. Ka-ching!
 
OMG! Is Trump president yet? This is big news from the reliable Western Journal dot com.
 
IMHO....

The USSC will NEVER overturn an election.

They may find actions illegal / UnConstitutiomal, but they have no desire to be the ones who overturn a national election involving millions of Americans voting.

Besides, 2 years have gone by / Biden has been President for 2 years.

Do you really think the USSC is going to void those 2 years and remove a sitting President?

Not going to happen.
 
Somebody named Tim Canova's opinion of somebody named Jim Hoft's opinion about The S.C. decision of Moore v Harper redistricting? Don't lefties have more on their plate than this?
 
It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.


All I see is 'no standing"
 

Forum List

Back
Top