Breaking: Van runs into crowd outside N. London Mosque

Targeting civilians is never ok in my book.

No, neither is it for me.

But you can see here on this forum that people are massively hypocritical. They hate Muslims for doing this that and the other, but they'll defend their own govt and white people from doing the same thing.


Do you pull for both teams at a sporting event?

So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


See post #236
 
Targeting civilians is never ok in my book.

No, neither is it for me.

But you can see here on this forum that people are massively hypocritical. They hate Muslims for doing this that and the other, but they'll defend their own govt and white people from doing the same thing.


Do you pull for both teams at a sporting event?

So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


invading for pleasure

govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it

huh?
 
No, neither is it for me.

But you can see here on this forum that people are massively hypocritical. They hate Muslims for doing this that and the other, but they'll defend their own govt and white people from doing the same thing.


Do you pull for both teams at a sporting event?

So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


See post #236

Post 236 is on ignore, and it's hard to see why, the guy is just an insulter.

If YOU have a point to make, make it, I'm not even going to read what that guy wrote.
 
No, neither is it for me.

But you can see here on this forum that people are massively hypocritical. They hate Muslims for doing this that and the other, but they'll defend their own govt and white people from doing the same thing.


Do you pull for both teams at a sporting event?

So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


invading for pleasure

govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it

huh?

Well, for example, Vietnam invaded Cambodia because the Khmer Rouge (being supported by the US govt) was Genocidal. There are certain cases where invasions are done for the right and correct reasons, then there are invasions which are done for the wrong reasons, and Iraq definitely fits into that category.
 
Lol. I knew it wouldn't take them long to try to capitalise, but this is fast.
What happened to kumbayas and moving on and get used to it?

Muslim Council of Britain: perpetrator was 'motivated by Islamophobia'
A statement from the Muslim Council of Britain has condemned the incident, noting it is “widely being described as a terror attack”. The statement said witness accounts described the van “intentionally ploughed into a group of worshippers who were already tending to someone who had been taken ill”. Harun Khan, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain said:

During the night, ordinary British citizens were set upon while they were going about their lives, completing their night worship. My prayers are with the victims and their families. It appears from eye witness accounts that the perpetrator was motivated by Islamophobia.

Over the past weeks and months, Muslims have endured many incidents of Islamophobia, and this is the most violent manifestation to date.
Given we are approaching the end of the month of Ramadan and the celebration of Eid with many Muslims going to local mosques, we expect the authorities to increase security outside mosques as a matter of urgency.
Muslim communities have been calling for increased action to tackle the growth in hate crime for many years and transformative action must now be taken to tackle not only this incident but the hugely worrying growth in Islamophobia.
Many will feel terrorised, no doubt be angry and saddened by what has taken place tonight. We urge calm as the investigation establishes the full facts, and in these last days of Ramadan, pray for those affected and for justice.”

Police are yet to say whether the event in Finsbury Park constitutes a terrorist attack.

Finsbury Park: casualties as van crashes into pedestrians near London mosque – live updates
 
Do you pull for both teams at a sporting event?

So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


invading for pleasure

govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it

huh?

Well, for example, Vietnam invaded Cambodia because the Khmer Rouge (being supported by the US govt) was Genocidal. There are certain cases where invasions are done for the right and correct reasons, then there are invasions which are done for the wrong reasons, and Iraq definitely fits into that category.


Let me know when you make up your mind:


"govts should be going around invading for pleasure"

"govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it"

"there are invasions which are done for the wrong reasons"

So Iraq in 1991 was bad?
 
So, are you telling me this is a fucking team sport? No, I'm not going to take sides on this one. I'm taking the side of what is right, what is correct. I don't believe govts should be going around invading for pleasure.


Understood. I was trying to address why people may not be very objective and fair in such matters.

Examples of when govts went around invading for pleasure?

Iraq. I wasn't meaning literally invading for pleasure, I was meaning when govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it, like Iraq 2003.


invading for pleasure

govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it

huh?

Well, for example, Vietnam invaded Cambodia because the Khmer Rouge (being supported by the US govt) was Genocidal. There are certain cases where invasions are done for the right and correct reasons, then there are invasions which are done for the wrong reasons, and Iraq definitely fits into that category.


Let me know when you make up your mind:


"govts should be going around invading for pleasure"

"govts invade for no reason other than because they feel like it"

"there are invasions which are done for the wrong reasons"

So Iraq in 1991 was bad?

Iraq invading Kuwait in 1991 was bad. I'm not sure what you have a problem with here. I don't think govts should invade just because they feel like it. In most cases there should be a regional willingness to solve a problem that is worthy of regime change or invasion. For example Senegal invading Gambia because the president wouldn't adhere to the election results, and then putting in place the legitimate president, at the request of the legitimate president is worthy of such a thing and I don't believe was opposed by anyway.

Iraq 2003 was opposed by most US allies, plus many Middle Eastern countries.
 
May he RIP.

One man confirmed to have died, eight people injured

Police have confirmed that one man was pronounced dead at the scene and eight were injured. The Metropolitan Police put out a statement confirming that counter-terrorism police were investigating and that the area had been designated as a crime scene.

The injured have been taken to three separate hospitals; two people were treated at the scene for minor injuries.

At this stage there are no reports of any persons having suffered any knife injuries. The driver of the van - a man aged 48 - was found detained by members of public at the scene and then arrested by police in connection with the incident. He has been taken to hospital as a precaution, and will be taken into custody once discharged. He will also be subject of a mental health assessment in due course.

Finsbury Park: one dead, eight injured as van hits worshippers near London mosque – live updates
 
No doubt another crazed Amish jihadist

Actually, this looks like a terrorist act against Muslims instead of terrorism perpetrated by Muslims.

Hence the reason why many on the right have now gone to bed, because they're not outraged at all, so no point in staying up.

Hmm, I'm not sure who's in bed or not. I assume you're not happy with the number of people denouncing this terrorism. Some would argue it is a justified retaliation.
 
Counter-terrorism police are investigating a major incident in Finsbury Park, north London, after a van hit pedestrians and left a number of casualties.

“We have sent a number of ambulance crews, advance paramedics and specialist responses teams to the scene. An advance trauma team from London’s air ambulance has also been dispatched by car.”

Images and video posted to Twitter showed police vehicles blocking the street and a cordon in place. More than a dozen emergency vehicles could be seen near the UKCG Help Centre at the junction of Seven Sisters Road and the A503 Tollington Road.

One resident told the Press Association he jumped out of the way as the van struck pedestrians. The man, who did not want to be named, said: “The gentleman went straight down this road, people were just conversing, talking, just doing what we’re doing.

“And he just came into all of us. There was a lot of people. We got told to move straight away. I was shocked, shocked, shocked. There were bodies around me. Thank God I just moved to the side, I just jumped. Everyone is hurt. Everyone is actually hurt.”
London counter-terror police investigate after van hits worshippers near mosque
 
LATEST: Incident in Finsbury Park
Latest at 04:46hrs on 19 June


The investigation into the circumstances of the incident in Seven Sisters Road in Finsbury Park is ongoing.

Police were called just after 0020hrs 18 June to reports of a van in collision with pedestrians.

Officers attended alongside other emergency services and found and tended to a number of casualties.

One man was pronounced dead at the scene. Officers are in the process of informing next of kin. A post mortem examination will be scheduled due course.

Eight people injured were taken to three separate hospitals; two people were treated at the scene for minor injuries.

At this stage there are no reports of any persons having suffered any knife injuries.

The driver of the van - a man aged 48 - was found detained by members of public at the scene and then arrested by police in connection with the incident.

He has been taken to hospital as a precaution, and will be taken into custody once discharged.

A number police units are at, and managing the cordons around, the crime scene, including local officers and those from neighbouring boroughs - supported by armed officers and the Territorial Support Group.

The investigation of the incident is being carried out by the Counter Terrorism Command.

At this early stage of this investigation, no other suspects at the scene have been identified or reported to police, however the investigation continues.

Due to the nature of this incident extra policing resources have been deployed in order to reassure communities, especially those observing Ramadan.

Any witnesses, or anyone with any information, can contact police via 101, or via Twitter @MetCC.

To give information anonymously call Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or visit crimestoppers-uk.org.

When more information has been confirmed as accurate, it will be released as appropriate in due course.

Latest at 01:03hrs on 19 June

Police were called just after 0020hrs 18 June to reports of a vehicle in collision with pedestrians.

Officers are on scene with other emergency services.

There are a number of casualties being worked on at the scene.

There has been one person arrested.

Enquiries continue.

More information will be released when confirmed.
 
Did he plow down Muslims at the mosque? I heard the building that went up like a Roman candle was filled with Muslims. Maybe it's retaliation.
That is the sort of thing that happens when the government fails to protect the public or to deliver justice when they fail to protect them.
 
Hmm, I'm not sure who's in bed or not. I assume you're not happy with the number of people denouncing this terrorism. Some would argue it is a justified retaliation.
Retaliating against unarmed civilians is never justified.
I agree. And I'm not sure now if this is an attack after all as an eyewitness said the driver was drunk, and the Muslims he ran over were helping an elderly man either in the road or at the edge of the curb near a bus stop. Then they beat the crap out of the driver/?terrorist. There were also no knife wounds after all. I guess we'll find out soon enough.
 
Last edited:
Comments from my buds tonight.....lots of text of "munch".

Fucking duh........we'll be seeing in the next several months and years what non-matrix entrenched people have always known multiculturalism is ghey. Get some huge ass bags of popcorn and sit back and watch the shit that gonna emerge from France Germany, The Netherlands and Britain.:party:
Hey, peoples in my country were crush down including children Nice by a terrorist others were shut down for no reason Paris Nothing entertaining !

Nice-terror-truck-attack.jpg

The body of a child lies in the road with a doll beside it following the attack in Nice
Slaughter of the innocents: 10 children killed and 54 injured by Nice terrorist
 

Forum List

Back
Top