Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,359
- 1,830
Exactly. Substitute Bush for Obama, Gonzales for Holder, KKK for Black Panthers and that shit would have been on the nightly news for a year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Andrew Breitbart committed an act of pure racism. He defamed a black woman for the purposes of discrediting an organization devoted to the advancement of black people.
His actions were racist. His motive was racist.
In a time when everyone loves to complain that the term 'racist' is thrown around much too loosely, too frequently, and too often without sufficient cause,
this time it was unequivocal, irrefutable, undiluted, unadulterated, and indisputable
RACISM.
No, that does not make him a racist.
What were his motives? Racist? What makes them racist? His desire to discredit the NAACP who accused the Tea Party movement of harboring racism? Not everything involving race equals racism.
No. His actions are unethical and in my opinion criminal. He is a disgusting person utterly lacking in empathy and morals. He doesn't have to be a racist to be an utterly dispicable scumbag.
explain the "criminal" part please.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
they call the Tea Party racist too without a shred of evidence. ya think they gots em a thing going on?
Its almost like I am living in a SNL skit that wont end..... Problem is I am getting really pissed off, and find myself not sitting back and taking shit from ANYONE whatsoever!
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Crap.... you had to go and expose the real reason! Now what are the whiney little pissant libs going to do????
Oh I know.... they will just keep on calling "real" journalists racists and excusing all the racist in their midst. Hmm... go figure
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
The part where they cheered her comment about "not doing all she could to help the white farmer"... amongst others.
That part.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Crap.... you had to go and expose the real reason! Now what are the whiney little pissant libs going to do????
Oh I know.... they will just keep on calling "real" journalists racists and excusing all the racist in their midst. Hmm... go figure
Do real journalists release edited portions of a tape in an attempt to create a false story designed to destroy a person's reputation in an effort to score political points?
And, what does that say about those who excuse those "journalists"?
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
The part where they cheered her comment about "not doing all she could to help the white farmer"... amongst others.
That part.
And how do you know that was the only reason they were cheering her when you couldn't see the whole thing? Oh wait. You don't.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
I would say ummmmm..... yeah it would be.
That is when they were cheering correct?
She was talking to a bunch of crackah hating NAACP members.... Andrew is just using the lefts own tactics against them and it is killing them.
But there are still people who insist Sharpton's not a bigot.
Crap.... you had to go and expose the real reason! Now what are the whiney little pissant libs going to do????
Oh I know.... they will just keep on calling "real" journalists racists and excusing all the racist in their midst. Hmm... go figure
Do real journalists release edited portions of a tape in an attempt to create a false story designed to destroy a person's reputation in an effort to score political points?
And, what does that say about those who excuse those "journalists"?
I dunno... journalists like Dan Rather make shit up. And Journalists like the Rolling Stone writer garner people's trust and then use their comments gained in trust to ruin them. And journalists like Juan Williams deny all things Obama to prop him up.
Nothing new.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Sorry m'man, I ain't buying that.
IMO Breitbart was looking to paint the administration as racist. Paraphrasing myself: "See this woman? See how racist she is? Obama appointed her head of a federal bureaucracy".
Meanwhile, an innocent woman has lost her job. Although from the looks of things, she's probably going to come out alright. But that wasn't a given by anymeans, and there is no way Brietbart intended for her to come out of it OK. IMO, Breitbart just looked on her as means to end to discredit the administration, and if she became collateral damage, too bad.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Was that when he released just a portion of her video?
The part where they cheered her comment about "not doing all she could to help the white farmer"... amongst others.
That part.
So no one has listened to what Brietbart said about the video. Why does that not surprise me? Of course if you are left of center anything he says will be a lie, doesn't matter if you hear it or not.
However to be fair he says, and yes I am paraphrasing here, that he released the video to show how the members of the NAACP were cheering her on, and that there was no way they could have known what her story was leading up to.
And you know, if you actually watch the video, the woman was talking to a bunch of racists.
Sorry m'man, I ain't buying that.
IMO Breitbart was looking to paint the administration as racist. Paraphrasing myself: "See this woman? See how racist she is? Obama appointed her head of a federal bureaucracy".
Meanwhile, an innocent woman has lost her job. Although from the looks of things, she's probably going to come out alright. But that wasn't a given by anymeans, and there is no way Brietbart intended for her to come out of it OK. IMO, Breitbart just looked on her as means to end to discredit the administration, and if she became collateral damage, too bad.
BO wasn't the target. The NAACP was.