ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,507
- 54,271
- 3,615
Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?
Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?
Holy shit you are clueless.
That’s not how the world works.
Standard for warrants is REASONABLE SUSPICION, not 100% established guilt. Standard for a warrant on Carter was even lower, since he was already a known Russian intelligence asset, from a prior case.
Dossier material was disclosed as a political source material, but it corraborated other evidence.
Still standing by this absolutel lie of a post?
Nunes has given 8 criminal referrals to the AG regarding this.
So fucked, Dimms.
He can reffer whatever the fuck his little Trump-ass-kissing heart desires. Means nothing.
But even aside from that, his refferals have nothing to do with the basis of FISA warrants.
You could not be more wrong. Why is your tongue up the asses of the corrrupt DOJ players? Why do you want a corrupt government?
What does the Woods procedure mean to you? Why is that a thing, specifically?