Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
It's all in the links I supplied (which you didn't read) You've ALREADY been shown. Read Baby! Read!How come you're FOCUSING on Dearborn, when I listed many enclaves ? Why Dearborn ? Are you thinking this is somehow a weak spot, or something ? Checking Dearborn, you'll find some of the most severe examples of Islamization in America. And what about the other enclaves ? You ignore them ? Why ? lol1. You're the chicken. You won't take the Islamization Quiz to find out how ignorant you are.Stabbing in the back when you thought I was gone. You just failed the integrity test. Computer's OK here now.
Says the guy that made up a bullshit computer problem as an excuse to avoid why he couldn't back up his bullshit conspiracy theory. Unless of course you can show us the 'YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone?
No? Gee, I wonder what you excuse will be this time.
I do have another forum to attend to though, so I will be gone for a while. And a few Islamapologists pretending that there aren't no go zones is really too ridiculous to take very seriously anyway,
So your claims are so true....that you don't actually need any evidence to prove them?
Holy shit, dude. You're raising self delusion to an art form.
So I don't see any offer from you to take my Islamization Quiz. Chicken ?
Is this going to involve that poor, hapless idiot Steve Emerson....you know, the one who was so utterly ignorant and uselessly clueless that he actually had to apologize for the mindless drivel about 'muslim no go zones' he offered.
You know Steve, right? He's your primary source on 'Muslim No go zones'.
Oh, and you never did answer my questions: So if 'their ludicrous ideology shouldn't be allowed in America at all', what would you suggest we do with the millions upon millions of Muslims?
And would your solution involve camps, by any chance?
Why avoid the questions? Chicken?
Ignorant, huh? Who between us said that "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".....but then couldn't sow us a single 'documented report from the US government saying as much?
I'll give you a hint: that wouldn't be me.
But you expect me to accept you as a source on 'Islamization'? You already epicly failed the crediblity test. As you couldn't back your own bullshit.
2. All the info you need is in my links and their links.
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to find the "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".
Unless you have no idea what your 'links' say, because you have no idea what's on those pages. Then we'll get more excuses for why you can't possibly back up your bullshit.
I mean, for crying out loud you didn't know that Steve Emerson had utterly humiliated himself on national television regarding Muslim 'no go zones' until I told you. And yet in your ignorance, you still expect me to accept you as having the slightest clue what you're talking about?
You've failed the credibility test twice now. Once on Dearborn. Once on Emerson. Either show us the years of documented reports of the US government on Dearborn Michigan.....
.....or admit you made that shit up.
You just pretend they'r enot there, and pretend that I am holding something back. This is absurd. Everyone knows about the no go zones, unless you're a liberal who only gets told liberal-approved info. You don't know how much you don't know. Just take the Islamization Quiz. That will clear it all up. Chicken ?
Laughing.....all you have to do is show me the reports from the US government you claim to be citing saying that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim no-go zone...and you win. But you can't. All you can do is tell me about them. As long as I don't ask to actually see them. As long as I don't ask you to back any of it up.
Show me.
And you're still running from my cartoon simple questions. So if 'their ludicrous ideology shouldn't be allowed in America at all', what would you suggest we do with the millions upon millions of Muslims?
And would your solution involve camps, by any chance?
You keep running. I'll keep laughing. Deal?
Dearborn is number 1 on your list.
Show me the "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".
Or admit you made that shit up. Its one or the other.
Of course they would not have the right to assembly as Muslims, because Islam is banned by the Constitution, as are any other supremacist ideologies, cults, religions, groups, etcOh, and I almost forgot. While we're on this 'purge the constitution of rights and freedoms' kick of yours, would Muslims have the right to assembly? Or would that be stripped from them too?
Of course they must. But even without taking oaths of citizenship, Muslims are in violation of the Constitution every time they engage in Muslim activities (by virtue of the Constitution Supremacy Clause and 2 US Codes)Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
The Constitution? You want to bring up the Constitution? Tell me which of these Muslims who didn't perjure themselves when they took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the US. One must take that oath to become naturalized as a citizen of USA. Charge them with perjury and plotting to overthrow our Constitution and deport them.
These people are using our own laws against us. No go zones are not part of America. They must go.
It's all in the links I supplied (which you didn't read) You've ALREADY been shown. Read Baby! Read!How come you're FOCUSING on Dearborn, when I listed many enclaves ? Why Dearborn ? Are you thinking this is somehow a weak spot, or something ? Checking Dearborn, you'll find some of the most severe examples of Islamization in America. And what about the other enclaves ? You ignore them ? Why ? lol1. You're the chicken. You won't take the Islamization Quiz to find out how ignorant you are.Says the guy that made up a bullshit computer problem as an excuse to avoid why he couldn't back up his bullshit conspiracy theory. Unless of course you can show us the 'YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone?
No? Gee, I wonder what you excuse will be this time.
So your claims are so true....that you don't actually need any evidence to prove them?
Holy shit, dude. You're raising self delusion to an art form.
Is this going to involve that poor, hapless idiot Steve Emerson....you know, the one who was so utterly ignorant and uselessly clueless that he actually had to apologize for the mindless drivel about 'muslim no go zones' he offered.
You know Steve, right? He's your primary source on 'Muslim No go zones'.
Oh, and you never did answer my questions: So if 'their ludicrous ideology shouldn't be allowed in America at all', what would you suggest we do with the millions upon millions of Muslims?
And would your solution involve camps, by any chance?
Why avoid the questions? Chicken?
Ignorant, huh? Who between us said that "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".....but then couldn't sow us a single 'documented report from the US government saying as much?
I'll give you a hint: that wouldn't be me.
But you expect me to accept you as a source on 'Islamization'? You already epicly failed the crediblity test. As you couldn't back your own bullshit.
2. All the info you need is in my links and their links.
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to find the "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".
Unless you have no idea what your 'links' say, because you have no idea what's on those pages. Then we'll get more excuses for why you can't possibly back up your bullshit.
I mean, for crying out loud you didn't know that Steve Emerson had utterly humiliated himself on national television regarding Muslim 'no go zones' until I told you. And yet in your ignorance, you still expect me to accept you as having the slightest clue what you're talking about?
You've failed the credibility test twice now. Once on Dearborn. Once on Emerson. Either show us the years of documented reports of the US government on Dearborn Michigan.....
.....or admit you made that shit up.
You just pretend they'r enot there, and pretend that I am holding something back. This is absurd. Everyone knows about the no go zones, unless you're a liberal who only gets told liberal-approved info. You don't know how much you don't know. Just take the Islamization Quiz. That will clear it all up. Chicken ?
Laughing.....all you have to do is show me the reports from the US government you claim to be citing saying that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim no-go zone...and you win. But you can't. All you can do is tell me about them. As long as I don't ask to actually see them. As long as I don't ask you to back any of it up.
Show me.
And you're still running from my cartoon simple questions. So if 'their ludicrous ideology shouldn't be allowed in America at all', what would you suggest we do with the millions upon millions of Muslims?
And would your solution involve camps, by any chance?
You keep running. I'll keep laughing. Deal?
Dearborn is number 1 on your list.
Show me the "YEARS of DOCUMENTED reports of the US govt (DOJ & DHS)' that say that Dearborn Michigan is a Muslim 'no-go' zone".
Or admit you made that shit up. Its one or the other.
Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
The Constitution? You want to bring up the Constitution? Tell me which of these Muslims who didn't perjure themselves when they took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the US. One must take that oath to become naturalized as a citizen of USA. Charge them with perjury and plotting to overthrow our Constitution and deport them.
These people are using our own laws against us. No go zones are not part of America. They must go.
I liked the the British Prime Minister's comment on Emerson, 'This guy’s clearly a complete idiot'.
Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
The Constitution? You want to bring up the Constitution? Tell me which of these Muslims who didn't perjure themselves when they took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the US. One must take that oath to become naturalized as a citizen of USA. Charge them with perjury and plotting to overthrow our Constitution and deport them.
These people are using our own laws against us. No go zones are not part of America. They must go.
What no-go zones?
The Constitution DOESN'T HAVE TO mention the supremacisms by name that it bans. It only has to mention the act of being supremacist (which of course Islam is just that). And a prohibition DOESN'T NEED TO be made. It's already there (Article 6, Section 2, the Supremacy clause) + 2 US Codes (you have a reading comprehension problem ?)Of course they would not have the right to assembly as Muslims, because Islam is banned by the Constitution, as are any other supremacist ideologies, cults, religions, groups, etcOh, and I almost forgot. While we're on this 'purge the constitution of rights and freedoms' kick of yours, would Muslims have the right to assembly? Or would that be stripped from them too?
Actually, the constitution never mentions Islam. Making a constitutional prohibition of it rather difficult. The constitution does however mention religion, and specifically forbids government from making any laaw that impedes the free excercise of it.
Laws like say.....burning all of their religious books. Forbidding them from practicing their religion. Forbidding them from assembling. Seizing all their places of worship. You know, pretty much everything you're demanding we do to Muslims.
Oh, and will there be any due process in this scenario. Or have you wiped your ass with the entire bill of rights?
Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
The Constitution? You want to bring up the Constitution? Tell me which of these Muslims who didn't perjure themselves when they took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the US. One must take that oath to become naturalized as a citizen of USA. Charge them with perjury and plotting to overthrow our Constitution and deport them.
These people are using our own laws against us. No go zones are not part of America. They must go.
What no-go zones?
Open your eyes, Skylar. You are guaranteed to remain in eternal ignorance on matters where you refuse to examine the evidence. The HLF trials produced many names, Muslim groups - they were listed as un-indicted co - conspirators and Holder still has done nothing. There is a problem when the DOJ refuses to do their job. A huge problem. There are 35 known Jihadist training camps here in the USA. There is a book published about these camps and documented evidence that when people requested to enter these Muslim jihadist camps they were told no. Guess what that is called, Skylar? A no go zone. Do I really have to spell it out for you? Wake up, Doll. This is serious.
You've ALREADY been corrected on both of those things. So which is it ? Deep DENIAL ? or a reading comprehension problem ?I liked the the British Prime Minister's comment on Emerson, 'This guy’s clearly a complete idiot'.
When you're so fucking ignorant that Fox News has to apologize for your idiocy....you're trail blazing new kinds of useless.
Oh, and speaking of useless, Steve Emerson (yes, that one) is one of Protect's primary sources.
The Constitution DOESN'T HAVE TO mention the supremacisms by name that it bans. It only has to mention the act of being supremacist (which of course Islam is just that). And a prohibition DOESN'T NEED TO be made. It's already there (Article 6, Section 2, the Supremacy clause) + 2 US Codes (you have a reading comprehension problem ?)Of course they would not have the right to assembly as Muslims, because Islam is banned by the Constitution, as are any other supremacist ideologies, cults, religions, groups, etcOh, and I almost forgot. While we're on this 'purge the constitution of rights and freedoms' kick of yours, would Muslims have the right to assembly? Or would that be stripped from them too?
Actually, the constitution never mentions Islam. Making a constitutional prohibition of it rather difficult. The constitution does however mention religion, and specifically forbids government from making any laaw that impedes the free excercise of it.
Laws like say.....burning all of their religious books. Forbidding them from practicing their religion. Forbidding them from assembling. Seizing all their places of worship. You know, pretty much everything you're demanding we do to Muslims.
Oh, and will there be any due process in this scenario. Or have you wiped your ass with the entire bill of rights?
As for religion, Islam is not a religion.
And even if it was a religion, religions aren't allowed to be supreme over the constitution either. Nothing is.
You've ALREADY been corrected on both of those things. So which is it ? Deep DENIAL ? or a reading comprehension problem ?I liked the the British Prime Minister's comment on Emerson, 'This guy’s clearly a complete idiot'.
When you're so fucking ignorant that Fox News has to apologize for your idiocy....you're trail blazing new kinds of useless.
Oh, and speaking of useless, Steve Emerson (yes, that one) is one of Protect's primary sources.
I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error. And I am issuing this apology and correction for having made this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham. I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful. There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham. I am not going to make any excuses. I made an inexcusable error. And I am obligated to openly acknowledge that mistake. I wish to apologize for all residents of that great city of Birmingham.
Steve Emerson
PS. I made a donations of £500 to the Birmingham Children's Hospital, £150 to Birmingham St Marys Hospice and £150 to Acorns Childrens Hospice.
Fox News apologizes for terror expert s totally Muslim claim - Yahoo News
You've ALREADY been corrected on both of those things. So which is it ? Deep DENIAL ? or a reading comprehension problem ?I liked the the British Prime Minister's comment on Emerson, 'This guy’s clearly a complete idiot'.
When you're so fucking ignorant that Fox News has to apologize for your idiocy....you're trail blazing new kinds of useless.
Oh, and speaking of useless, Steve Emerson (yes, that one) is one of Protect's primary sources.
Oh, your problem is that I can read too well. I can read this for example:
I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error. And I am issuing this apology and correction for having made this comment about the beautiful city of Birmingham. I do not intend to justify or mitigate my mistake by stating that I had relied on other sources because I should have been much more careful. There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham. I am not going to make any excuses. I made an inexcusable error. And I am obligated to openly acknowledge that mistake. I wish to apologize for all residents of that great city of Birmingham.
Steve Emerson
PS. I made a donations of £500 to the Birmingham Children's Hospital, £150 to Birmingham St Marys Hospice and £150 to Acorns Childrens Hospice.
Fox News apologizes for terror expert s totally Muslim claim - Yahoo News
And this hapless idiot, blundering so publicly on Muslim 'no go zones' that even Fox News denounced him.......this is your primary source on Muslim no go zones?
I just want to be sure we're talking about the same guy. This is your source, yes?
Here are some suggestions for what could be done with the former Muslim buildings and land in the no go zone enclaves. The enclaves would be destroyed, of course, but there's no need to destroy perfectly good buildings.
Would the Muslims be given any compensation for the buildings we would seize? And of course, would there be any semblance of due process? I mean, prohibitions against laws that impede the free exercise of religion are clearly out, as you're demanding we wipe our asses with the 1st amendment. But surely the 5th is still around?
Or will you purge more of the constitution in your attempt to save the constitution?
The Constitution? You want to bring up the Constitution? Tell me which of these Muslims who didn't perjure themselves when they took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the US. One must take that oath to become naturalized as a citizen of USA. Charge them with perjury and plotting to overthrow our Constitution and deport them.
These people are using our own laws against us. No go zones are not part of America. They must go.
What no-go zones?
Open your eyes, Skylar. You are guaranteed to remain in eternal ignorance on matters where you refuse to examine the evidence. The HLF trials produced many names, Muslim groups - they were listed as un-indicted co - conspirators and Holder still has done nothing. There is a problem when the DOJ refuses to do their job. A huge problem.
Watch and learn:
There are 35 known Jihadist training camps here in the USA. There is a book published about these camps and documented evidence that when people requested to enter these Muslim jihadist camps they were told no. Guess what that is called, Skylar? A no go zone. Do I really have to spell it out for you? Wake up, Doll. This is serious and ignorance is not bliss!............ it's deadly.
Here's some more of Fox News' bullshit being laughed at. The French no-go zones this time.When you're so fucking ignorant that Fox News has to apologize for your idiocy....you're trail blazing new kinds of useless.
Did you see where the Muslim refuses entry to the Islamic Jihadist camp he is guarding?
He threatens them with violence and says Go! Go! He is telling them they cannot enter there and as the car is driving away he is beating it with a bat. It is what is known as a no - go zone for those who are unaware of no go zones in America.
You want to know why this is going on? Because our government refuses to do anything about it when the FBI and law enforcement report on it.
Rent the movie Rwanda and realize that is what happens to unarmed citizens in a Muslim take over - In Rwanda the Hutu Muslims slaughtering Tutsi Christians had machetes - in America? They have AK - 47's. Time to wake up.
You are a liberal typically very ignorant on Islamization matters, and because of that I am having to slowly (and painstakingly) try to bring you up to speed. But you need to learn what I've already taught you. You have MANY more things to learn here.The Constitution DOESN'T HAVE TO mention the supremacisms by name that it bans. It only has to mention the act of being supremacist (which of course Islam is just that). And a prohibition DOESN'T NEED TO be made. It's already there (Article 6, Section 2, the Supremacy clause) + 2 US Codes (you have a reading comprehension problem ?)Of course they would not have the right to assembly as Muslims, because Islam is banned by the Constitution, as are any other supremacist ideologies, cults, religions, groups, etcOh, and I almost forgot. While we're on this 'purge the constitution of rights and freedoms' kick of yours, would Muslims have the right to assembly? Or would that be stripped from them too?
Actually, the constitution never mentions Islam. Making a constitutional prohibition of it rather difficult. The constitution does however mention religion, and specifically forbids government from making any laaw that impedes the free excercise of it.
Laws like say.....burning all of their religious books. Forbidding them from practicing their religion. Forbidding them from assembling. Seizing all their places of worship. You know, pretty much everything you're demanding we do to Muslims.
Oh, and will there be any due process in this scenario. Or have you wiped your ass with the entire bill of rights?
Says who?
Wait......Fox reject Steve Emerson, right?
As for religion, Islam is not a religion.
Says who? And who decides what is a religion and what isn't? You're offering us your personal opinion...and based on that alone, insisting that we violate at least a half dozen rights of Millioins of Muslims.
Stripping them of free speech, free excercise of religion, freedom of assembly, protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to redress, due process and just compensation of their property.
Oh, can Muslims be armed? If they wanted to stock up on AKs and ARs, they have second amendment rights, yes? Or are those too stripped from them in your draconian little fantasy? And can we arbitrarily strip anyone of their rights simply with your opinion?
Or is that only Muslims?
And even if it was a religion, religions aren't allowed to be supreme over the constitution either. Nothing is.
And Islam isn't supreme over our constitution. Remember, all your 'muslim no go' nonsense is useless conspiracy drivel. As you demonstrated for us so elegantly with your rather humiliating failure regarding the 'years and years of government docs saying that Dearborn is a muslim no-go zone'.
