Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,438
- 2,290
Most of these discussions revolve around business owners.They sure as hell would be if they worked for me! I am glad to hear the chef decided to do thier job.That does not mean they are obligated to do soThe guy in the hat should be served and the baker should have baked the cake. The doors open to make money so do your fucking job!So in order for you NOT TO BE A HYPOCRITE, I guess you believe the bakers had every right to refuse to bake that cake! Right?
It is smart to serve anyone who pays but of any business wishes to do otherwise they should have the right to do so.
This chef is smarter in that she apologized and reversed here idiotic stance.
Makes the op look like a fucking moron too
I don't know if the chef is the owner or an employee but the issue is about owners serving who they choose to.
Granted a smart one will turn no customers away but no one should be forced to run a business in a smart way
I was a little confused about that myself. But after reading the OP a couple of times, it seems the chef is a co-owner with somebody else; somebody who had the sense to tell the clown to recant those remarks. He immediately took it off of Twitter, but by then, the damage was done.