California Drought: All About Control

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
what the environmentalist along with their government has done to that state should be a crime
until the people stand up to them they will continue to stomp all over you. AND this is just one way they plan on doing it.

SNIP:


California Drought: All About Control
photo_231.jpg
By Douglas V. Gibbs -- Bio and Archives April 13, 2015
Comments| Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us |
gibbs041315.jpg



If Barack Obama can bypass his legislature, and seize executive control like a dictator at the national level, California Governor Jerry Brown has determined he can do the same at the state level. The liberal left blames Pat Brown, the California governor that was Jerry Brown’s father, for the water crisis California faces by determining it was Pat Brown’s decision to bring water to Southern California which encouraged millions upon millions to come to Southern California, which in turn created a population so big that there isn’t enough water to quench the thirst of all of them.

The truth is, the fault does not lie in Pat Brown’s “water evangelism,” as much as the largely liberal left leadership of California’s past and present did not, and refuses to, prepare for the consequences of Pat Brown’s incredible water projects that, yes, attracted millions of new people to California.

More than half of a century ago, California Pat Brown went on a crusade, to bring water to Southern California, at any price. Pat Brown was governor of California from 1959 to 1967, and during his reign, he launched the California Water Project, a $1.8 billion initiative that turned California into an oasis. The San Joaquin Valley in Central California was lush with farms, and became the Salad Bowl of the World. Today’s farmland, minus the sacrificial lamb of the Central Valley, of which has been made into a dust bowl in the name of a little fish called a delta smelt, still covers 750,000 acres of irrigated farmland.

Pat Brown’s water crusade recognized that the rain was in Northern California, but the need for water was in Southern California, where, if not for humanity’s manipulation of the landscape, it would be an arid desert.

Brown succeeded, creating an incredible system that encouraged the population of California to boom from 1959’s 15 million, to today’s nearly 40 million people. Much of the migration was from the old dust bowl in the midwest and the south, most of those people seeking to work on farms. My grandfather was one of those folks - a poor sharecropper from Arkansas willing to work incredible hours in the fields to make a living, and live in a shack with no comforts of civilized life. . . a job today, we are told, Americans aren’t willing to do, so we must import new workers, illegally, from south of the border.

all of it here:
California Drought All About Control


 
What you describe seems to be a plan to bring people to Callifornia for the real estate and other retail profits and a dramatically increased tax base, one could assume.

What we do NOT see in your text is anything supporting the charge of increased control. We hear that a great deal: that liberals want control, that they're power hungry. Where is the evidence supporting such a contention in California?
 
Even the trees are gettin' thirsty in Calif....

Long Drought Affecting California’s Sequoias
September 28, 2015 - California is suffering under a historic four-year drought and scientists say even the state's famed sequoia trees are feeling the pain. The National Park Service has started detailed research to see how it can help the oldest living things on earth survive.
Slowly and painstakingly, University of California tree biologist Anthony Ambrose climbs up a giant sequoia in California’s Sierra Nevada mountain range, the only place on earth where these magnificent trees live. “It’s an amazing experience to be able to climb up into these things and know that it's been growing in this same spot for a thousand years or more,” he said. Sequoias grow over 90 meters tall, their trunks are up to 15 meters wide and some of them are more than 3,000 years old.

Once-rich mountain streams have dwindled to trickles and the trees - that each need more than 3,000 liters of water a day - are now getting much less. Some of them are showing signs of thirst. “We've observed some unusual and abnormal levels of foliage die-back, which haven't been observed in the park before,” Ambrose said. Sensors installed in tree canopies, examinations of seedlings, data from individual trees and images collected by observational planes will help scientists measure the seriousness of the danger.

One possible solution would be to cut down less important species of trees that compete with sequoias for water. “They'll have more water than they would have in a denser forest, more nutrients and light and therefore be more resistant and resilient to these hot droughts they're faced with in the future,” said Koren Nydick, who is with the National Park Service. Scientists say that over thousands of years, sequoias have gone through many droughts, forest fires, insect infestations and other calamities, so they will probably survive this drought, unlike many less-resilient California trees.

VIDEO
 
Poor old Stephanie cannot realize that when you have a drought, you can't farm that well.

But the rains will come back, temporarily, and then when efforts are made to build more reservoirs, you will be screaming bloody murder because that kind of project is paid for with tax money. You 'Conservatives' won't let such projects be built, then you do the blubbering crybaby routine when the lack of them causes problems.
 
Poor old Stephanie cannot realize that when you have a drought, you can't farm that well.

But the rains will come back, temporarily, and then when efforts are made to build more reservoirs, you will be screaming bloody murder because that kind of project is paid for with tax money. You 'Conservatives' won't let such projects be built, then you do the blubbering crybaby routine when the lack of them causes problems.


Sure --- Let's see --- High speed train to nowhere vs a new reservoir.. Hmmmmm
train/nowhere vs 2showers a week. :dunno:


OK -- I'll take the extra shower. Now lets' see who REALLY opposes that project..
You know the answer GoldiRocks. It aint the Conservatives.
 
Bullshit. You know better Flacatenn. When a project like that is proposed, and the payment is right there in the bill, as it should be, you 'Conservatives'; immediately scream about the fact that taxes are being raised to pay for it. And, if their are enough of you, the project dies.
 
Bullshit. You know better Flacatenn. When a project like that is proposed, and the payment is right there in the bill, as it should be, you 'Conservatives'; immediately scream about the fact that taxes are being raised to pay for it. And, if their are enough of you, the project dies.

That's not how California works O-Rocks. They put a bond issue on the ballot --- I used to write the opposition statement for the Lib Party because no one else would --- the morons pass it almost UNAMINOUSLY. Not a chance for any Conservatives to oppose it -- and then 5 year later, the money has been squandered on studies and legal challenges and right of way payments to rich partisans..

No taxes EVER raised to pay for ANYTHING in the Golden State. The poor and indigent just take a poke in the shorts.

And it WILL BE the eco-leftists hosting all those legal challenges to filling some beautiful canyon full of water..

Hell about 10 years ago -- they were screaming about TEARING down Hetch HetchY dam which is the principle reservoir for San Fran and the Bay Area..
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top