Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there is no exception for the President, we all have to follow the law, including court decisions, all the way through the appeals court and then if it makes it there, by the Supreme Court....Which one.
The one original (that Obama wiped his ass with), or the one the left wishes were in place ?
the one that references checks and balances
that help?
That would be the first one I mentioned.
However, please show me where it says that the President is obligated to follow courts decision.One could start with the President's oath of office and go on to the full US Constitution from there!However, please show me where it says that the President is obligated to follow courts decision.
Well, not really.
Anti first amendment people, and fascists who hate democracy and civil rights, and people like you who don't like checks and balances are all peas in a pod.Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?SCOTUS will have to decide on its constitutionality. The screaming and yelling here of the antifas does not meant a thing in the real world.GOP Congress will pass an "Act"...not a law, banning sanctuary cities...Trump will sign it.Poor neo-fascist alt right snowflakes just melting away in all of their steam.
indeed they are the same
No they aren't but you need a history lesson anyway.
Alt Right neo-fascists are antifa
this is false
antifa and fascists do have much in common
Anti first amendment people, and fascists who hate democracy and civil rights, and people like you who don't like checks and balances are all peas in a pod.Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?SCOTUS will have to decide on its constitutionality. The screaming and yelling here of the antifas does not meant a thing in the real world.
indeed they are the same
No they aren't but you need a history lesson anyway.
Alt Right neo-fascists are antifa
this is false
antifa and fascists do have much in common
The judge has ruled, and now the judicial process must play out.
Flash, please produce the evidence for "Of course the filthy ass judge that made the ruling is an Obama appointee that contributed a quarter of a million to Obama's campaign", because your say so gets the heave ho without proof.
Anyone can read your posts over the last year and see you are on the side of the hard right and oppose American civil liberties, including the right to free speech.Anti first amendment people, and fascists who hate democracy and civil rights, and people like you who don't like checks and balances are all peas in a pod.Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?
indeed they are the same
No they aren't but you need a history lesson anyway.
Alt Right neo-fascists are antifa
this is false
antifa and fascists do have much in common
The judge has ruled, and now the judicial process must play out.
once again you resort to you childish lies
fuck you
CA judge rendered a decision, you can't do shit about it snowflake.Kate Steinle thought she was in a safe place!Only some beta male with tons of butt hurt would or could come up with that.
That would be why all the Trump-wimps are whining out their butthurt here in thread after thread.
It's strange. You'd think they'd be pleased about winning, but instead, the Trump-wimps constantly keep getting more whiny and butthurt. Every day they're here crying even harder about how the mean ol' liberals keep humiliating them and DearLeader.
You poor Trump-snowflakes. I suggest you all create a SafeSpace where you don't have to worry about those awful liberals laughing at you and triggering you with facts and evidence. Then you can retreat there, and do what conservative men always do when they're together out of the public eye.
LOL. the above offal offered by a trumptard, a member of a very deplorable minority.A minority once again imposing its will on the majority, illegally again in this case.States right, whuyagonna do.California just happens to be the most liberal state in the US, filled with liberal activist judges. No surprise here.It's a federal judge. What's "California" got to do with anything?
Is California "an island in the Pacific"? Or is there some new geographical feature this week that magically nullifies the federal judiciary?
It's what liberals do...
"I do whine because I want to win and I'm not happy about not winning and I am a whiner and I keep whining and whining until I win," ~ and then i whine some more and some more and some more, cuz mean judges, mean democrats, mean press, mean wimmin, mean reality, and so it goes.Whining?! Trump?Say it with me: SEE YOU IN COURT!
Being how Trump keeps getting humiliated in court, why are you asking for more humiliation?
It's not complicated. If Trump wants to stop losing in court, he should stop pissing on the Constitution. If you all of your Trump-bedwetters want the country to stop laughing at you, you have to stop whining like little loser bitches.
Only some beta male with tons of butt hurt would or could come up with that.
Actually, Trump won the Presidency, not Hillary.LOL. the above offal offered by a trumptard, a member of a very deplorable minority.
A reliable poll? Yeah, that's what I thought. HRC would win a much larger PV. Quit being a snowflake, easy.Actually, Trump won the Presidency, not Hillary.LOL. the above offal offered by a trumptard, a member of a very deplorable minority.
A poll shows that if the election were held today 98% of Trump voters would still vote for Trump as opposed to only 85% of Hillary voters who would still vote for Hillary. THAT means Hillary would no longer win the Popular Vote...which means snowflake Hillary supporters are the ones in the minority, chief.
No, it won't. It's a two-fer. Get rid of the hard left and neo-fascist alt right.More fodder that the design of the liberals in America is to destroy the country........no worries.........just means the nationalistic fervor will grow even bigger!!
The Executive Branch can't run the Legislative, the legislative can't run the Executive so neither should the Judicial interfere with the Executive branch's constitutional responsibilities.
Once again for the short bus ----- the judicial branch is put there specifically as a check on the others. That's ITS Constitutional responsibility.
This faggot judge did not show reason why the government can't withhold Federal funds.
Your faggot post did not show any basis for its conclusion.
See what I did there? Naaah, you prolly don't.
Take your insults and go hang out somewhere else, will you please asshole?
No one is doing that. BTW you don't seem to be aware of the Supreme Court has rendered a decision limiting local authorities' involvement with immigration law.Just what is it the Trumpbots want the locals to do?If a local government and their law enforcement, who were hired to keep their citizens safe, believe it is in their citizens best interest to not fill up their jail cells with illegal immigrants, and safer for their citizens to use their Police who they pay, to protect their neighborhoods instead of stopping people on the streets asking for ID, or their Police department, based on the neighborhood watch groups and calls they have received from those who are undocumented on illegal doings in their neighborhoods or even harm done to them.... and how those calls have helped them capture more perps and keep their neighborhoods safer and believe using their jail cells and their money and their time to do the job that ICE and the federal govt is suppose to do would harm their citizens more by making it less safe for them, then I think there could be some merit to that argument.So?
Do we just roll over and suck our thumbs like a good liberal does?
I do NOT believe that if a citizen commits a crime and is jailed for that crime that a non citizen should simply be let loose for committing the same crime....they should be jailed also.
I just don't think the Police should be forced by the Federal govt to take the time and ask every person they stop for a minor traffic violation if they are a citizen or not and spend the time arresting them and putting them in their jails until someone from ICE decides to mosey on down there and retrieve them.
Even in the most conservative communities in the country, I doubt the locals would really want their local police enforcing immigration law. They would have to allocate significant portions of their time and local tax dollars chasing down people that are at most guilty of a just a misdemeanor instead of going after thieves, murders, and rapists.
The people being deported today are mostly convicted criminals whose nationality and location is know to law enforcement. So picking these people up and deporting them is relatively easy. However, they are in the minority. Most undocumented immigrants are not known to the police and have not been convicted of any serious crime. These people will not be easy to apprehend or deport. To find these people ICE will need significant help from local law enforcement and other agencies and they are not likely to get it.
No one is asking or requiring them to do that. The rest of your post is irrelevant.
Stop hindering ICE from doing their job.
actually, you were blubbering about a "minority once again imposing its will on the majority". i notice that you cut that out of the context, you little maggot.Actually, Trump won the Presidency, not Hillary.LOL. the above offal offered by a trumptard, a member of a very deplorable minority.
A poll shows that if the election were held today 98% of Trump voters would still vote for Trump as opposed to only 85% of Hillary voters who would still vote for Hillary. THAT means Hillary would no longer win the Popular Vote...which means snowflake Hillary supporters are the ones in the minority, chief.
Take your insults and go hang out somewhere else, will you please asshole?
Go fuck yourself.
No, snowflake. I was pointing out how the Democrats, who are in the minority in this country, have a habit of imposing their will on the majority.actually, you were blubbering about a "minority once again imposing its will on the majority". i notice that you cut that out of the context, you little maggot.
