Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show me in the Constitution where illegal immigrants are covered by our rights, so far a lot of empty bullshit from the lying left and no proof. I will wait.I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
why do you hate the Constitution?
Republican?
Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?SCOTUS will have to decide on its constitutionality. The screaming and yelling here of the antifas does not meant a thing in the real world.GOP Congress will pass an "Act"...not a law, banning sanctuary cities...Trump will sign it.That is notCity, BS true. The check and balance system is working. I don't necessarily agree with the Sanctuary City, BS ; however, it is good to see the Republicans don't have free rein over everything!I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with the country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.Poor neo-fascist alt right snowflakes just melting away in all of their steam.
I say go for it! It will add another charge onto the Articles of Impeachment of the Narcissist-in Chief.I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
And the Orange One just keeps 'WINNING' in his race to the bottom!
Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?SCOTUS will have to decide on its constitutionality. The screaming and yelling here of the antifas does not meant a thing in the real world.GOP Congress will pass an "Act"...not a law, banning sanctuary cities...Trump will sign it.That is notCity, BS true. The check and balance system is working. I don't necessarily agree with the Sanctuary City, BS ; however, it is good to see the Republicans don't have free rein over everything!I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with the country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.
Yeah, OOM thinks I am black, and talk about a craving he has for me. My goodness. He is such a slut.The judge who issued the order is a homosexual.
But is he black?
Because if he is, all the Trump-snowflakes will crave his manhood that much more.
It's a crime a lib would even try to think.I say go for it! It will add another charge onto the Articles of Impeachment of the Narcissist-in Chief.I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
And the Orange One just keeps 'WINNING' in his race to the bottom!
Your user name is appropriate. The crap you post is a crime against thought because none took place in your empty cranium.
So you believe that sanctuary Cities and States are Constitutional ?I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
why do you hate the Constitution?
Republican?
That is not true. The check and balance system is working. I don't necessarily agree with the Sanctuary City, BS ; however, it is good to see the Republicans don't have free rein over everything!I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with the country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.
What "that" do you mean is untrue?That is not true.
I don't know why you mentioned that. You're the second person who has. I have only one response to it. "Of course, the system of checks and balances is working."check and balance system is working.
He probably does being an anti American lib.So you believe that sanctuary Cities and States are Constitutional ?I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
why do you hate the Constitution?
Republican?
I was responding to the notion that the Judicial branch will usurp the power of the president and "run" the country.That is not true. The check and balance system is working. I don't necessarily agree with the Sanctuary City, BS ; however, it is good to see the Republicans don't have free rein over everything!I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with the country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.What "that" do you mean is untrue?That is not true.
Mamooth is just one more crybaby libtard.Yeah, OOM thinks I am black, and talk about a craving he has for me. My goodness. He is such a slut.The judge who issued the order is a homosexual.
But is he black?
Because if he is, all the Trump-snowflakes will crave his manhood that much more.
I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
why do you hate the Constitution?
Republican?
Which one.
The one original (that Obama wiped his ass with), or the one the left wishes were in place ?
But you cheered when obuthole violated the Constitution. Hypocritical asswipe.‘[Judge]Orrick in his order found the city and county were likely to succeed on their claims that Trump was attempting to wield powers “exclusive to Congress," and that the executive order violates the Constitution’s Tenth and Fifth amendments. As such, the judge rejected the government’s argument that any injunction issued in the case should only apply to the two jurisdictions.
"These constitutional violations are not limited to San Francisco or Santa Clara, but apply equally to all states and local jurisdictions," Orrick said.’
Trump’s Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked by Federal Judge
Further proof of this administration’s contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.
We're you crying when obuthole violated the Constitution? Thought not.I say withhold the funds anyway, screw the psycho libtard judge.
why do you hate the Constitution?
Republican?
Which one.
The one original (that Obama wiped his ass with), or the one the left wishes were in place ?
the one that references checks and balances
that help?
The statue says they (state or local authority) can not prohibit nor restrict..... However, they can certainly do nothing to help the federal government enforce the federal law which is exactly what most sanctuary cities are going to do, nothing.Breaking Update:
The order:
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/3043/Order-Granting-Motions-to-Enjoin-9-a-of-Exec-O.pdf
The text of 8 USC 1373 is quite plain. It was written precisely to do what these Rat party operatives are trying to get away with: noncompliance with Federal immigration enforcement.
(a) In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.
(b) Additional authority of government entitiesNotwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no person or agency may prohibit, or in any way restrict, a Federal, State, or local government entity from doing any of the following with respect to information regarding the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual:
(1) Sending such information to, or requesting or receiving such information from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
(2) Maintaining such information.
(3) Exchanging such information with any other Federal, State, or local government entity.
(c) Obligation to respond to inquiries
The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall respond to an inquiry by a Federal, State, or local government agency, seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information.
Nope. What I am saying is that the Alt Right neo-fascists are antifa, just as the hard left extremists have them. America will not let either extremes shut down free speech.Are you trying to say that antifa and fascists are the same?SCOTUS will have to decide on its constitutionality. The screaming and yelling here of the antifas does not meant a thing in the real world.GOP Congress will pass an "Act"...not a law, banning sanctuary cities...Trump will sign it.That is notCity, BS true. The check and balance system is working. I don't necessarily agree with the Sanctuary City, BS ; however, it is good to see the Republicans don't have free rein over everything!I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with the country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.
