Can OCTAs Provide Positive Evidence Flt 77 Was Hijacked?

[candycorn]

But you OCTAs have been screaming all along the CR is a full report of that day. Yet, you are now saying it is incomplete. So which is it you ignorant ****? Once again you have shown you don't know what you are talking about. That's why Candycorn stopped trying to post evidence of Renee's call. When it was realized the CR did not provide the evidence the next move was to dodge.

So it appears you are also conceding that the CR does not provide objective evidence Renee made the call. I would ask but since you lie so much why waste the time?

Surely there must be at least one OCTA willing to address the fact the CR is lacking evidence of the OCT. You ***** kept screaming it has evidence Renee made the call but when you really had to prove that you realized it is not true. Look on the bright side, you can say the reason you won't continue is because I'm such an asshole. That's always a good mulligan for lying fucks like you and candycorn.

first of all, i am not a OCTA (whatever that is) i am a Truther seeking the truth.

The commission report says she made the call. are you denying that? is that what you are disputing and are you claiming the 9/11 commission is lying about it??

have you proved she didnt make the call? how do you explain her parents calling american airlines to pass her message on?

did you have a dick in your ass all night or what? i think it damaged your brain.

The CR never proves she made the call you dumbass. I've posted that evidence several times.

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

 

[CurveLight]

Please link other examples of leaders who have committed acts of war against the United States who have been charged by the FBI for civilian crimes.

9E fell under the jurisdiction of the FBI so it wouldn't matter who did it.....that does not change the jurisdiction. Aren't you the genius that said you didn't know the Truth movement was started by victims families and first responders? Now you want to delve into the legal arena of jurisdictions? Aha..slow down tyke and learn some basics before embarrassing yourself some more

 

[CurveLight]

Some researcher...he can't spell Al Queda correctly.
You're dealing with someone who is simply crying for attention in Curvelight.
He's dead to me until he produces some sort of contradictory story.

It's always telling when ***** like you focus on how Alkida is spelled instead of the substantive issues. You can't provide objective evidence of your claim so you pull this stupid shit.

Testimony of Mr. Olson's secretaries and the May's contacting AA about 77 being hijacked is proof. That you can't see it only strengthens my position that you guys are all morons.

Anyway, good luck in life; you'll need it fry chief.

You're fucking pathetic. You said there was "iron clad proof" of the phone call but all you have is hearsay evidence. You call me a moron because I can see the difference between hearsay and iron clad evidence? Lol...what a worthless bitch.

 

[CurveLight]

first of all, i am not a OCTA (whatever that is) i am a Truther seeking the truth.

The commission report says she made the call. are you denying that? is that what you are disputing and are you claiming the 9/11 commission is lying about it??

have you proved she didnt make the call? how do you explain her parents calling american airlines to pass her message on?

did you have a dick in your ass all night or what? i think it damaged your brain.

The CR never proves she made the call you dumbass. I've posted that evidence several times.

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

 

[Liability]

The CR never proves she made the call you dumbass. I've posted that evidence several times.

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

No no, you dishonest imbecile. I highlighted it for you (although you are so fundamentally dishonest and woerfully stupid, it probably won't serve to clear anything up for your retarded apthetic excuse of a mind).

The records, of course, are not "hearsay."

The records are -- records. The records reflect a number of telephone calls to unknown numbers. Thus, the records establish that calls were made, but they cannot alone tell which numbers were reached.

This is not brain surgery. It's not even difficult. Well, it's not difficult, that is, except for utter morons with no common sense or interest in honesty. That explains why you persist in saying such empty, mindless, dishonest bullshit.

 

[CurveLight]

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

No no, you dishonest imbecile. I highlighted it for you (although you are so fundamentally dishonest and woerfully stupid, it probably won't serve to clear anything up for your retarded apthetic excuse of a mind).

The records, of course, are not "hearsay."

The records are -- records. The records reflect a number of telephone calls to unknown numbers. Thus, the records establish that calls were made, but they cannot alone tell which numbers were reached.

This is not brain surgery. It's not even difficult. Well, it's not difficult, that is, except for utter morons with no common sense or interest in honesty. That explains why you persist in saying such empty, mindless, dishonest bullshit.

You stupid mother fucker. They are saying they don't know which two calls AS STATED BY TED OLSON are represented by the numbers. The FBI has never proven the calls to Ted and in the ZM trial which was 2 years after the CR report they actually contradicted his claim by pointing out they could only attribute one unconnected call to Barb olson. The evidence is hearsay because ted Olson told people what his wife supposedly said but nobody can confirm that happened. You really are too stupid to be in this discussion. That's not meant to be an insult just like saying a fish cannot pedal a bike is not an insult. You lack basic equipment.

 

[candycorn]

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

No no, you dishonest imbecile. I highlighted it for you (although you are so fundamentally dishonest and woerfully stupid, it probably won't serve to clear anything up for your retarded apthetic excuse of a mind).

The records, of course, are not "hearsay."

The records are -- records. The records reflect a number of telephone calls to unknown numbers. Thus, the records establish that calls were made, but they cannot alone tell which numbers were reached.

This is not brain surgery. It's not even difficult. Well, it's not difficult, that is, except for utter morons with no common sense or interest in honesty. That explains why you persist in saying such empty, mindless, dishonest bullshit.

You stupid mother fucker. They are saying they don't know which two calls AS STATED BY TED OLSON are represented by the numbers. The FBI has never proven the calls to Ted and in the ZM trial which was 2 years after the CR report they actually contradicted his claim by pointing out they could only attribute one unconnected call to Barb olson. The evidence is hearsay because ted Olson told people what his wife supposedly said but nobody can confirm that happened. You really are too stupid to be in this discussion. That's not meant to be an insult just like saying a fish cannot pedal a bike is not an insult. You lack basic equipment.

His secretaries testified to the affirmative.
The Mays contacted AA.
Your accusations are just your twisted cries for help. Were you not loved as a child?
Anyway, those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

 

[candycorn]

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

No no, you dishonest imbecile. I highlighted it for you (although you are so fundamentally dishonest and woerfully stupid, it probably won't serve to clear anything up for your retarded apthetic excuse of a mind).

The records, of course, are not "hearsay."

The records are -- records. The records reflect a number of telephone calls to unknown numbers. Thus, the records establish that calls were made, but they cannot alone tell which numbers were reached.

This is not brain surgery. It's not even difficult. Well, it's not difficult, that is, except for utter morons with no common sense or interest in honesty. That explains why you persist in saying such empty, mindless, dishonest bullshit.

I think the only thing that would appease the claim is if somehow we go back in time to put ourselves in the room when the phone calls are made.

The only thing that would appease Curvelight is someone to actually like him. Thats not going to happen.

 

[Toro]

Please link other examples of leaders who have committed acts of war against the United States who have been charged by the FBI for civilian crimes.

9E fell under the jurisdiction of the FBI so it wouldn't matter who did it.....that does not change the jurisdiction. Aren't you the genius that said you didn't know the Truth movement was started by victims families and first responders? Now you want to delve into the legal arena of jurisdictions? Aha..slow down tyke and learn some basics before embarrassing yourself some more

Aren't you the guy that dodges and weaves when asked questions? Why, yes you are! Its no surprise that you cannot link another person who has committed acts of war against the United States and has been charged by the FBI. Embarrassing yourself seems to be a constant for you.

The fact that 9/11 fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI does not mean bin Laden is not responsible. The standards of proof and admissible evidence in a court of law are high, and much of the evidence linking bin Laden to 9/11 comes through intelligence, much of which is not admissible in a court of law.

Acts of war against the United States are the purview of the legislative and executive branches. We may disagree with the Bush administration's prosecution of the War on Terror, but they viewed 9/11 as an act of war. The Obama administration appears to think differently.

Also, as any prosecutor knows, it is far more difficult to prove a case against the guy at the top who directed or sponsored the crime than it is to prove a case against the guys who carried it out. Simply because bin Laden has not been charged does not mean al-Qaeda is not responsible. That is akin to saying that simply because a mob boss has not been charged, there is no proof of crimes by the mafia, or simply because the CEO of a corporation has not been charged, there is no proof of malfeasance by a corporation.

 

[Fizz]

The CR never proves she made the call you dumbass. I've posted that evidence several times.

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

hey jackass, where does it say that the 4 calls were the only calls made from the plane?

clearly the commission report think both Olson and May made phone calls. it states it can not confirm which calls were from Olson. It does not say the May call is one of the calls to and unknown number.

 

[Fizz]

Hahahaha....you're such a fucking useless pussy. You tried to say bin laden wasn't charged because it would be "useless" to charge someone before catching the person. You stupid fuck. The charges have to be filed before arresting the person. Then you want to twist my questioning the OCT into claiming I am a terrorist apologist? You're fucking pathetic and you continue to prove it by lying and trying to find any way to demonize me instead of discussing the facts. Fucking **** loser.

you gay moron. that isnt what i said at all. you are fucking lying again!!!

it is useless to file additional charges at this point because he already has charges filed against him.

 

[CurveLight]

No, you posted that 'accusation' several times.

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

hey jackass, where does it say that the 4 calls were the only calls made from the plane?

clearly the commission report think both Olson and May made phone calls. it states it can not confirm which calls were from Olson. It does not say the May call is one of the calls to and unknown number.

You dumbfuck. I asked SEVERAL times for the evidence in the CR the May call was confirmed with objective evidence and you produced nothing. You also know I point blank said I didn't know if those were the only calls......that is why asked if people knew of other calls. Got anything else einstein?

 

[DiveCon]

You. Stupid. Mother. Fucker. I linked the FBI page to show they don't wait until they have physically caught someone before charging him with a crime.

except he wasnt CHARGED you dumbfuck
he has an arrest warrant

The arrest warrant only happens AFTER CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED YOU FUCKING ****! At the Arraignment is where the Formal charges as returned by a Grand Jury are presented you dumbass! Read this you simple spunk fucking turd:

"Step 2: File charges with a District Court commissioner. Step 3: How to complete the application. Step 4: Issuing a summons or an arrest warrant."
Criminal Issues

Do you see how CHARGES get filed before the arrest warrant is issued? Read it until you understand how fucking wrong you are.....but just like everything else you will find a way to weasel out of admitting you fucked up. Bitch.

stop lying, charges are NOT filed until after the arrest

 

[Fizz]

No, the evidence. Look at page 9 of "We Have Some Planes" and look at footnote 56. That is the evidence given by the CR. It simply refers the reader to footnote 57 which states:

57.The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four "connected calls to unknown numbers" represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband's office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May's parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls).The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 915 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report, "American Airlines Airphone Usage," Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001;AAL response to the Commission's supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004.


That's the actual footnote from the CR you stupid ****. It point blank says they could not confirm the numbers. Without that confirmation the evidence is hearsay and not iron clad as you claimed. Hey, it was your dumbass that cited that page as evidence. Guess you should have done more homework before trying to pass off hearsay evidence.

hey jackass, where does it say that the 4 calls were the only calls made from the plane?

clearly the commission report think both Olson and May made phone calls. it states it can not confirm which calls were from Olson. It does not say the May call is one of the calls to and unknown number.

You dumbfuck. I asked SEVERAL times for the evidence in the CR the May call was confirmed with objective evidence and you produced nothing. You also know I point blank said I didn't know if those were the only calls......that is why asked if people knew of other calls. Got anything else einstein?

holy fuck... i think that dick up your ass all night really did fuck up your brain.

the commission report says there was a phone call by May. if you dont like what the commission report claims or how they document those claims then take it up with them.

i provided you other evidence that May made the phone calls. you seem to not like it. i told you what you can do to find out if it is fake or not. you are just too lazy to do it.

 

[CurveLight]

No no, you dishonest imbecile. I highlighted it for you (although you are so fundamentally dishonest and woerfully stupid, it probably won't serve to clear anything up for your retarded apthetic excuse of a mind).

The records, of course, are not "hearsay."

The records are -- records. The records reflect a number of telephone calls to unknown numbers. Thus, the records establish that calls were made, but they cannot alone tell which numbers were reached.

This is not brain surgery. It's not even difficult. Well, it's not difficult, that is, except for utter morons with no common sense or interest in honesty. That explains why you persist in saying such empty, mindless, dishonest bullshit.

You stupid mother fucker. They are saying they don't know which two calls AS STATED BY TED OLSON are represented by the numbers. The FBI has never proven the calls to Ted and in the ZM trial which was 2 years after the CR report they actually contradicted his claim by pointing out they could only attribute one unconnected call to Barb olson. The evidence is hearsay because ted Olson told people what his wife supposedly said but nobody can confirm that happened. You really are too stupid to be in this discussion. That's not meant to be an insult just like saying a fish cannot pedal a bike is not an insult. You lack basic equipment.

His secretaries testified to the affirmative.
The Mays contacted AA.
Your accusations are just your twisted cries for help. Were you not loved as a child?
Anyway, those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

That is hearsay evidence you drippy ****. You fucked up by claiming you have "iron clad" evidence when really all you have is hearsay.

 

[Liability]

You stupid mother fucker. They are saying they don't know which two calls AS STATED BY TED OLSON are represented by the numbers. The FBI has never proven the calls to Ted and in the ZM trial which was 2 years after the CR report they actually contradicted his claim by pointing out they could only attribute one unconnected call to Barb olson. The evidence is hearsay because ted Olson told people what his wife supposedly said but nobody can confirm that happened. You really are too stupid to be in this discussion. That's not meant to be an insult just like saying a fish cannot pedal a bike is not an insult. You lack basic equipment.

His secretaries testified to the affirmative.
The Mays contacted AA.
Your accusations are just your twisted cries for help. Were you not loved as a child?
Anyway, those are the facts and they are not in dispute.

That is hearsay evidence you drippy ****. You fucked up by claiming you have "iron clad" evidence when really all you have is hearsay.

bent tight, that stupid lying cockgobbler, doesn't even comprehend that records such as those are not "hearsay." Correcting him doesn't help. He just repeats his prior "error," because he is a dumbass lying fucktard.

But, even so, the records are not "hearsay."

 

[CurveLight]

except he wasnt CHARGED you dumbfuck
he has an arrest warrant

The arrest warrant only happens AFTER CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED YOU FUCKING ****! At the Arraignment is where the Formal charges as returned by a Grand Jury are presented you dumbass! Read this you simple spunk fucking turd:

"Step 2: File charges with a District Court commissioner. Step 3: How to complete the application. Step 4: Issuing a summons or an arrest warrant."
Criminal Issues

Do you see how CHARGES get filed before the arrest warrant is issued? Read it until you understand how fucking wrong you are.....but just like everything else you will find a way to weasel out of admitting you fucked up. Bitch.

stop lying, charges are NOT filed until after the arrest

You dumb bastard. I posted the evidence showing the US charged bin laden with crimes way back in 1998. Obviously we have not arrested bin laden yet, but he has already been charged. Holy shit you are fucking stupid.

 

[Fizz]

hear⋅say  [heer-sey] Show IPA
–noun
1. unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge: I pay no attention to hearsay.
2. an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.
–adjective
3. of, pertaining to, or characterized by hearsay: hearsay knowledge; a hearsay report.


hey jackass, the secretary spoke with Olson. she is providing direct confirmation of a phone call she was involved in. that isnt hearsay. hearsay would be if she repeated the claims that there were hijackers on the flight made by Olson.

 

[CurveLight]

hey jackass, where does it say that the 4 calls were the only calls made from the plane?

clearly the commission report think both Olson and May made phone calls. it states it can not confirm which calls were from Olson. It does not say the May call is one of the calls to and unknown number.

You dumbfuck. I asked SEVERAL times for the evidence in the CR the May call was confirmed with objective evidence and you produced nothing. You also know I point blank said I didn't know if those were the only calls......that is why asked if people knew of other calls. Got anything else einstein?

holy fuck... i think that dick up your ass all night really did fuck up your brain.

the commission report says there was a phone call by May. if you dont like what the commission report claims or how they document those claims then take it up with them.

i provided you other evidence that May made the phone calls. you seem to not like it. i told you what you can do to find out if it is fake or not. you are just too lazy to do it.

Lol...the CR claims there was a call so it must be true! Rotfl! Thank you for admitting you accept what the government says without verification. Also, why do you keep talking about your fantasies of dicks in asses? Doesn't the net have better places for you to find what you are looking for?

 

[DiveCon]

The arrest warrant only happens AFTER CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED YOU FUCKING ****! At the Arraignment is where the Formal charges as returned by a Grand Jury are presented you dumbass! Read this you simple spunk fucking turd:

"Step 2: File charges with a District Court commissioner. Step 3: How to complete the application. Step 4: Issuing a summons or an arrest warrant."
Criminal Issues

Do you see how CHARGES get filed before the arrest warrant is issued? Read it until you understand how fucking wrong you are.....but just like everything else you will find a way to weasel out of admitting you fucked up. Bitch.

stop lying, charges are NOT filed until after the arrest

You dumb bastard. I posted the evidence showing the US charged bin laden with crimes way back in 1998. Obviously we have not arrested bin laden yet, but he has already been charged. Holy shit you are fucking stupid.

no, you posted BULLSHIT
not evidence