Can you imagine if Jim Jordan had been on the January 6th Committee

[Care4all]

It's a freaking congressional committee not a criminal jury. All it has is subpoena power. Lefties whined for the better part of half a century about the unfair treatment of alleged commies by HUAC (house unamerican activities committee) and here they are again pretending that the Jan 6 mom and pop trespassing incident is as big a threat as communists were during the Truman administration.

It was a coordinated conspiracy to overthrow the constitution and we the people's vote, to keep the unelected Trump in power. A Coup de' tat. The rioters were simply pawns in a much bigger plan by Trumpers in the House, in the doj -Clarke, the executive, state legislators, Trump lawyers Eastman, Giuliani, Powell, Ellis, Wood, and Meadows and 6 tea party congress critters, and Flynn, Bannon, Stone etc etc etc all had their part, behind and in front of the scene.....power point presentations on how to steal the election from Biden, lots of noise, fabricated, phony, propaganda that the election was stolen from trump....

Those rioters didn't even know what they were rioting for....they just knew it was something to do with Pence, and Trump sent them there....imo

 

[Yarddog]

Can you give a link supporting this?

Even Trump requested National Guard troops. Doesnt make much sense does it for .. someone who suppossedly wanted rioters to attack the capitol on one hand, and then on the other had asked for Guard troops to be present.

And yeah, Pelosi is ultimately in charge of security at the capitol. There needs to be an investigation to get down to the bottom of who knew what... and why the troops were called off.

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

 

[Yarddog]

It was a coordinated conspiracy to overthrow the constitution and we the people's vote, to keep the unelected Trump in power. A Coup de' tat. The rioters were simply pawns in a much bigger plan by Trumpers in the House, in the doj -Clarke, the executive, state legislators, Trump lawyers Eastman, Giuliani, Powell, Ellis, Wood, and Meadows and 6 tea party congress critters, and Flynn, Bannon, Stone etc etc etc all had their part, behind and in front of the scene.....power point presentations on how to steal the election from Biden, lots of noise, fabricated, phony, propaganda that the election was stolen from trump....

Those rioters didn't even know what they were rioting for....they just knew it was something to do with Pence, and Trump sent them there....imo

FBI said otherwise when they did their investigation. I guess you know more than the FBI who actually interviewed people at the scene.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

If Rep. Jordan were on the committee, it wouldn't be a Stalinist show trial as both sides would have a chance to speak their piece instead of just one.

I know libs don't like freedom of speech, that's why they object so much to Jordan, or other moderate representatives in Congress.

You're an idiot.

 

[Care4all]

Even Trump requested National Guard troops. Doesnt make much sense does it for .. someone who suppossedly wanted rioters to attack the capitol on one hand, and then on the other had asked for Guard troops to be present.

And yeah, Pelosi is ultimately in charge of security at the capitol. There needs to be an investigation to get down to the bottom of who knew what... and why the troops were called off.

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Key words, to protect HIS protesters.....what the F? The national guard to protect HIS supporters and NOT DC and the not the Capitol, and not Capital and DC Police....??? Not Congress? Not Pence? That's pretty damning!

He sat idle, sending NO HELP for 187 minutes.

187 minutes.

187 minutes.

 

[Care4all]

Even Trump requested National Guard troops. Doesnt make much sense does it for .. someone who suppossedly wanted rioters to attack the capitol on one hand, and then on the other had asked for Guard troops to be present.

And yeah, Pelosi is ultimately in charge of security at the capitol. There needs to be an investigation to get down to the bottom of who knew what... and why the troops were called off.

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Pelosi for the House has a Sgt of arms and McConnell for the Senate has a Sgt of Arms, responsible to handle the house and the senate, security.

 

[lennypartiv]

Trump ally Jim Jordan forwarded Mark Meadows argument for Mike Pence to reject Biden electoral votes We now have the texts of Jim Jordan attempting to persuade the vice president to illegally turn over the 2020 election. What else can you say. No one is surprised. The highest people in the Republican party are trying to overthrow our Democracy.

It's a shame Pence couldn't follow simple directions and block the certification.

 

[BWK]

It's a shame Pence couldn't follow simple directions and block the certification.

Pence had no basis for doing so, while Jim Jordan sent the text to Mark Meadows, instructing Pence to invent something unconstitutional in his head, that would have him overthrow a legal election, with no proof of fraud of course. Jordan tried to attempt a coup, by way of Meadows and Pence; All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC | The Chris Hayes Show

 

[BWK]

Pelosi for the House has a Sgt of arms and McConnell for the Senate has a Sgt of Arms, responsible to handle the house and the senate, security.

Do these Trump ignoramuses know anything?

 

[BWK]

It's a shame Pence couldn't follow simple directions and block the certification.

Simple instructions sent out by one of Trump's butt boys by way of a text to stop a legal election, and, who tried to be on the committee investigating a coup that he was part of. If it weren't so tragic and cowardly, it would be hilarious. And when the text message by Jordan was exposed, he said nothing for two days, until he had to. Their silence is their guilt and their fear;

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump ally Jim Jordan forwarded Mark Meadows argument for Mike Pence to reject Biden electoral votes We now have the texts of Jim Jordan attempting to persuade the vice president to illegally turn over the 2020 election. What else can you say. No one is surprised. The highest people in the Republican party are trying to overthrow our Democracy.

What it shows is how severely broken the House is. With a simple majority vote of 218-217 they can abuse their power in any way they see fit and it is completely legal. Democrats have shown us exactly what you claim you fear.

 

[BWK]

What it shows is how severely broken the House is. With a simple majority vote of 218-217 they can abuse their power in any way they see fit and it is completely legal. Democrats have shown us exactly what you claim you fear.

Your argument has shown nothing, because following the law is not an abuse of power. LOl! Democrats do not fear the law, because who is on the run opposing the law? The attempt at turning this argument around 180 degrees is not only an insult to one's intelligence, but a display of such pathetic weakness, that sonny boy, go sit your ass and your lame argument back down. I'm embarrassed.

 

[bodecea]

The committee could not get anymore corrupt than it is.

Funny words from someone in thrall to the fat former fascist.

 

[BWK]

Funny words from someone in thrall to the fat former fascist.

He got them from an elementary school text book. SMH!

 

[Meister]

Nancy wouldn't have allowed him on it.

She wouldn't allow him on it, but would allow Schiff and he ended up doctoring some evidence.

 

[BWK]

She wouldn't allow him on it, but would allow Schiff and he ended up doctoring some evidence.

That's another lie. Schiff didn't doctor any evidence. The texts deliver the same message.

 

[Meister]

That's another lie. Schiff didn't doctor any evidence. The texts deliver the same message.

sure, spanky, sure.

 

[BWK]

sure, spanky, sure.

Three words and an emoji. And that is your argument. LOl! Give it a rest bud. Your lies tell us everything about you, and that's enough.

 

[Independent thinker]

Your argument has shown nothing, because following the law is not an abuse of power. LOl! Democrats do not fear the law, because who is on the run opposing the law? The attempt at turning this argument around 180 degrees is not only an insult to one's intelligence, but a display of such pathetic weakness, that sonny boy, go sit your ass and your lame argument back down. I'm embarrassed.

Just remember that when Republicans take over the House after the midterms, followed by endless "oversight" investigations, impeachments of past presidents, impeachments of current presidents (and others). In short, with a vote of only 218-217 House Republicans will be able to do whatever the hell they want.

 

[BWK]

Just remember that when Republicans take over the House after the midterms, followed by endless "oversight" investigations, impeachments of past presidents, impeachments of current presidents (and others). In short, with a vote of only 218-217 House Republicans will be able to do whatever the hell they want.

Remember what, that following the law is not an abuse of power? The Left surely won't. Does the Right know the law? If they do, they won't be able to impeach any Democrat president, because there are no legal charges for impeachment. If you are that butt hurt over getting caught violating the law, inventing bogus crimes on others will prove fruitless. Get a hold of yourself man. You're losing your shit here.