Capitalism is NOT Democratic: Democracy is NOT Capitalist

We have some elements of a democratic society. We don’t vote directly (in most matters) on our laws. We vote for representatives who then vote directly on the laws. If we don’t like the results, we can vote for the other candidate.

That said, we are not a small d democracy at all. We are a Constitutional Republic. Our national charter does not permit even our representatives to pass some laws — at all. It is a Constitution which explicitly LIMITS the things that can be made law.

Indeed, in part, this Republic was founded upon a mistrust of democracy. At least it feared the prospect of a tyranny of the majority. So no. We are not a democracy. We accept some precepts of democracy but we also place limits on how far it may go.

I like democracy to the extent that We, the People, are our own sovereigns and should accordingly have a say in our own societal laws and rules. That does NOT, however, make us a democracy. I for one don’t want to live in a democracy without constraining it FROM trampling my rights and liberties — or yours.

I consider our Founders and Framers to be almost divinely inspired. Their work was brilliant.
How many amendments to that brilliant work do we have now?

And did that brilliant work come after the Articles of Confederation?


You want a fascist theocracy based on a large amount of people not voting (by out right limits or government overturning the vote) for the representative Democracy.
 
Reagan's tax cuts facilitated low interest rates

Lower taxes, lower inflation, lower interest rates. THE HUMANITY!!!!!!

The primary mode of accumulation has become financial, enabling investment bankers to replace government planners.

Thank goodness. Government planners suck ass.
The biggest problem we face today is stupidity.
 
How many amendments to that brilliant work do we have now?

And did that brilliant work come after the Articles of Confederation?


You want a fascist theocracy based on a large amount of people not voting (by out right limits or government overturning the vote) for the representative Democracy.
The ability to Amend the document was carefully made Part of the Constitution. That too was brilliant.

Much, most or all of the work to create the Constitution came while we were still under the Articles of Confederation. Obviously, this doesn’t include Amendments. I’m not sure I see why or how that question matters.

I have said nothing about anything to suggest that I would ever want a theocracy much less a fascist theocracy. There is nothing which I’ve ever said that would even fairly lead to such a conclusion.

So, it is clear that you are just a loon.
 
The ability to Amend the document was carefully made Part of the Constitution. That too was brilliant.

Much, most or all of the work to create the Constitution came while we were still under the Articles of Confederation. Obviously, this doesn’t include Amendments. I’m not sure I see why or how that question matters.

I have said nothing about anything to suggest that I would ever want a theocracy much less a fascist theocracy. There is nothing which I’ve ever said that would even fairly lead to such a conclusion.

So, it is clear that you are just a loon.
Brilliant work that included the following: Not allowing many in society to vote, for a direct election of their elected officials or labeling some only 2/3 human. Also, they our founding fathers didn't declare the document dead and allowed following generations the ability to improve on it.

Which they did.
 
I did and shows that your wrong.

The United States is a representative democracy. This means that our government is elected by citizens. ... These officials represent the citizens' ideas and concerns in government. Voting is one way to participate in our democracy.


You want a fascist theocracy.
Wrong its a representative republic which means we vote for men and women to represent us....a pure democracy goes like this....5 people in a room...3 men 2 women...the men vote to rape the women and the women vote no...in a democracy the women get raped....see the difference?....
 
Wrong its a representative republic which means we vote for men and women to represent us....a pure democracy goes like this....5 people in a room...3 men 2 women...the men vote to rape the women and the women vote no...in a democracy the women get raped....see the difference?....
The previous post was too stupid to even comment on because in a "pure democracy" committing a crime can be voted on.

Now can you explain what I posted that we are which is a representative Democracy.
 
The previous post was too stupid to even comment on because in a "pure democracy" committing a crime can be voted on.

Now can you explain what I posted that we are which is a representative Democracy.
That was an example idiot you missed the whole point....maybe this will correct your stupid civics teachers....

While often categorized as a democracy, the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic. What does this mean? “Constitutional” refers to the fact that government in the United States is based on a Constitution which is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution not only provides the framework for how the federal and state governments are structured, but also places significant limits on their powers. “Federal” means that there is both a national government and governments of the 50 states. A “republic” is a form of government in which the people hold power, but elect representatives to exercise that power.
 
That was an example idiot you missed the whole point....maybe this will correct your stupid civics teachers....

While often categorized as a democracy, the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic. What does this mean? “Constitutional” refers to the fact that government in the United States is based on a Constitution which is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution not only provides the framework for how the federal and state governments are structured, but also places significant limits on their powers. “Federal” means that there is both a national government and governments of the 50 states. A “republic” is a form of government in which the people hold power, but elect representatives to exercise that power.
So, we don't vote on our elected representatives or whether the constitution needs to be changed?

Your political view is your opinion of limits to powers.
 
Brilliant work that included the following: Not allowing many in society to vote, for a direct election of their elected officials or labeling some only 2/3 human. Also, they our founding fathers didn't declare the document dead and allowed following generations the ability to improve on it.

Which they did.
In that day it was deemed “obvious” that women couldn’t vote. It is true that blacks were counted for purposes of the census as I believe it was 4/5ths of a man. But that was solely a compromise to allow the creation of a Constitution in the diary place. Newsflash: in those days it wasn’t considered especially unusual to deem blacks inferior. Obviously nowadays we find that abhorrent. Yet imposing our fairly enlightened standards on an earlier age is kind of a silly exercise.

your final “point” is incoherent. Yes. The Framers did not declare their own work dead. Brilliant point. 🤪
 
We bombed Japan into the stone age almost 80 years ago. Why is North Korea still in the stone age?
Total U.S. assistance to Japan for 1946-1952 was roughly $15.2 billion in 2005 dollars, of which 77% was grants and 23% was loans.

U.S. Occupation Assistance: Iraq, Germany, and Japan Compared

"Most of these funds were provided through GARIOA grants. Japan repaid $490 million of the total postwar assistance. Of the $2.2 billion in total aid, an estimated $655 million, or almost a third, went to categories that would mostly contribute directly to economic recovery (industrial materials, including machinery and raw goods; petroleum and products; and transportation, vehicles, and equipment). Most of the rest went for..."
 
Total U.S. assistance to Japan for 1946-1952 was roughly $15.2 billion in 2005 dollars, of which 77% was grants and 23% was loans.

U.S. Occupation Assistance: Iraq, Germany, and Japan Compared

"Most of these funds were provided through GARIOA grants. Japan repaid $490 million of the total postwar assistance. Of the $2.2 billion in total aid, an estimated $655 million, or almost a third, went to categories that would mostly contribute directly to economic recovery (industrial materials, including machinery and raw goods; petroleum and products; and transportation, vehicles, and equipment). Most of the rest went for..."

Total U.S. assistance to Japan for 1946-1952 was roughly $15.2 billion in 2005 dollars, of which 77% was grants and 23% was loans.

Commie countries didn't help North Korea? That's awful!
 
Not stupid enough to believe rich people should control government.
It's impossible to trump that level of stupid.
Tired of winning?

Not stupid enough to believe rich people should control government.

Who should control it, Bernie and AOC?

It's impossible to trump that level of stupid.

But you always do......congrats!!!
 
what policies did Trump force African countries to adopt?
cbsn-fusion-trump-denies-shthole-comment-video-1480547-640x360.jpg
 
All government is built on force, dumbass. Government is nothing more than the monopoly on force. How can anyone who supports communism be opposed to the use of force?
Your ignorance of communism is impressive.
Maybe you should open your eyes?


"Marx and Engels maintained that a communist society would have no need for the state as it exists in contemporary capitalist society.

"The capitalist state mainly exists to enforce hierarchical economic relations, to enforce the exclusive control of property, and to regulate capitalistic economic activities—all of which would be non-applicable to a communist system.[10][17]

Communist society - Wikipedia

"Engels noted that in a socialist system the primary function of public institutions will shift from being about the creation of laws and the control of people into a technical role as an administrator of technical production processes, with a decrease in the scope of traditional politics as scientific administration overtakes the role of political decision-making.[20]

"Communist society is characterized by democratic processes, not merely in the sense of electoral democracy, but in the broader sense of open and collaborative social and workplace environments"
 

Forum List

Back
Top