Ringo
Gold Member
Country dynamics of tomato production. Pay attention to the moment of arrival of "effective managers" from russian capitalism. Absolute disaster
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
![]()
Which Is Better: Socialism or Capitalism?
Some of my friends have questioned my past affiliation with the Democrat party. I understand the reason for their inquisitiveness. Nevertheless, let me say that there is no similarity between the party of old and the party of no...www.americanthinker.com
the dems trying to bring almost total socialism to our shores. The govt controlling most means of production and distribution.
Putting aside your unsubstantiated claim about Democrats advocating socialism, your definition of socialism is completely out of date.![]()
Which Is Better: Socialism or Capitalism?
Some of my friends have questioned my past affiliation with the Democrat party. I understand the reason for their inquisitiveness. Nevertheless, let me say that there is no similarity between the party of old and the party of no...www.americanthinker.com
the dems trying to bring almost total socialism to our shores. The govt controlling most means of production and distribution.
Capitalism is the latest example of an economic system that allows investors to profit from the mass murder, maiming, and displacement of millions of innocent human beings since 1945.A society organized on the principles of profit and enrichment, a society in which from infancy man is cultivated as a competitor and rival to another man, will produce monsters, mourn the victims with crocodile tears, and produce new ones.
Thanks, some balance of powerI understand and agree with most of your points. Your post reminds me of what Adam Smith noted in Wealth Of Nations, that open market capitalism can function only with a moral and ethical society.
That implies that the leaders of capitalism, the capitalists themselves, must be moral and ethical. That is where we have failed. Of course there have always been homeless people, hobos and such after the Great Depression (another example of capitalism/banking failures), but it seems that after the debacle in 2008 they are now everywhere. I live in Florida where the weather suits their clothes, to borrow from the song and movie.
If capitalist leaders and bankers do not care at all about their fellow citizens, can those leaders be described as moral and ethical? I say no.
This is such a tedious and empty argument. It's like saying "freedom does not exist". What point are you trying to make? Why do you think this is a meaningful statement??The point in the bigger picture argument is that actual capitalism does not exist.
Before the Marxists/Demofascists took over in academia and government, a handshake was all it needed to deal between businesses and other people. But those damn pesky Marxists/Demofascists had to start allowing the criminal element into business (CRONIE CAPITALISM) where they picked winners and losers, instead of the free market that allowed competition, in prices and labor.The propagandists of capitalism say that talented people, inventors, organizers succeed because of capitalism. O.K. They do. And you know what these people immediately start doing? They start to fight with their competitors, to the point of banditry and murder. A normal phenomenon for the animal world of nature and shameful for a reasonable man. Only socialism and the construction of communist society will make people out of predators.
Because the Marxists/Demofascists love it when people are in poverty and misery, because then everyone is equal.I have been and still am a capitalist, but the question must be asked, "If capitalism works so well, why then are there so many homeless resulting from capitalism run amok?" Why are our cities such a mess if capitalism works so well?
Part of the answer to those questions is the fact that we have capitalism run amok, crony capitalism, whatever you want to call it. Our corporations are run by "leaders" who do not know right from wrong.
This is such a tedious and empty argument. It's like saying "freedom does not exist". What point are you trying to make? Why do you think this is a meaningful statement??
So, it's just a pointless comment.It's simply a factual statement. Nothing more.
Capitalism is contracts between the employee and the company, Communism is the forced labor of workers at the point of the gun...In a word, capitalism is exploitation:
Always has been, always will be.
http://digamo.free.fr/23things.pdf (P.25/378)
"In 1819 new legislation to regulate child labour, the Cotton Factories Regulation Act, was tabled in the British Parliament.
"The proposed regulation was incredibly ‘light touch’ by modern standards.
"It would ban the employment of young children – that is, those under the age of nine.
"Older children (aged between ten and sixteen) would still be allowed to work, but with their working hours restricted to twelve per day (yes, they were really going soft on those kids).
"The new rules applied only to cotton factories, which were recognized to be exceptionally hazardous to workers’ health."
So, it's just a pointless comment.
Why bother typing it? Bored?