Here we go again.Free markets don't exist so it's all simple theory.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here we go again.Free markets don't exist so it's all simple theory.
So is socialism.Capitalism uses up too much resources to produce stuff we don't need. Capitalism is still unable to produce necessities like affordable housing and health care
There are multiple forms of socialism challenging the conventional economic model of rational choice, the idea that individuals seek to maximize their individual utility.That's all great. But again, it's the policy toward traditional, privately held companies that I'm curious about. My understanding is that socialists want to replace privately owned companies. That they want to seize their assets and put them under state control. I think most people assume the same if they hear the term socialism. If all you're doing is promoting worker owned businesses, you're kind of undermining your cause by calling it socialism.
So is socialism.
The difference is no one least of all YOU are qualified to determine what someone NEEDS. Under capitalism we understand no one can decide on the needs of another.
That isn’t caused by capitalism per se. It’s caused by the collusion between government and business (Fascism) to generate enormous profits. Greed essentially.Capitalism uses up too much resources to produce stuff we don't need. Capitalism is still unable to produce necessities like affordable housing and health care
The government did,Who decided that banks needed billions of dollars bail out money?
Where does this fit into Capitalism?
The government did,
it has nothing to do with capitalism it is simply government corruption
but but but butBut that is our economic system. Actual Capitalism is only a theory largely because the "capitalists" aren't actually interested in it.
but but but but
It is an applied theory that works.
Finding government corruption and whining about it is not a valid argument and does not refute the fact that it is an applied theory which works
It is iused in many place so your full of shitIf it worked it would be used somewhere. It isn't.
While I believe it all a corrupt system, bail outs aren't corrupt, they are simply what we do.
It is iused in many place so your full of shit
They are not simply what we do they are examples of government corruption and have nothing to do with capitalism
Wrong it is used here and many placesIt's used nowhere.
We are not discussing corruption. Corruption exists in everything. When we were more capitalist than we are today there was corruption.