Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The CP5 did no horrible things. They were exonerated fully and those who wrongfully convicted them had to pay $45 millionShe got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million
She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.
The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."
It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.
There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.
She got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million
She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.
The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."
It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.
There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.
She got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million
She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.
The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."
It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.
There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.
I would give a medal to people who attack and exterminate others who are part of scam calls. 1 863 804 6638 the latest from Bartow, Fl. An attaboy and a hardy thanks to get rid of these scum. Scam scum they are!She got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million
She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.
The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."
It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.
There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.
Your connection to reality is non existent son. Go check yourself into a mental health facility.
Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"
Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"
Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?
I'd be glad to admit all evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but I have to see it in order to admit it. Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but leave out non evidence items such as allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims that you already posted it somewhere. Just post actual evidence that proves he is a racist, and I will admit that it exists.Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"
Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?
You cant see the evidence because your face is stuck too far up Drumpfs ass. So you go on trying to convince yourself he isnt a racist and I will go on knowing he is a racist.I'd be glad to admit all evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but I have to see it in order to admit it. Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but leave out non evidence items such as allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims that you already posted it somewhere. Just post actual evidence that proves he is a racist, and I will admit that it exists.Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....
"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."
"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”
But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.
According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"
Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?
You cannot "know" that Trump is a racist, since you have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves he is. You can only have deep emotional convictions and faith that is based on all the allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, and propaganda that has been compiled and organized to engineer a political narrative to be served to consumers of the msm. Your political opinion isn't even yours, it was engineered by the msm that owns you. That's why you are folding up like a cheap lawn chair when I ask for actual evidence instead of the same old allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, and propaganda.You cant see the evidence because your face is stuck too far up Drumpfs ass. So you go on trying to convince yourself he isnt a racist and I will go on knowing he is a racist.I'd be glad to admit all evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but I have to see it in order to admit it. Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but leave out non evidence items such as allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims that you already posted it somewhere. Just post actual evidence that proves he is a racist, and I will admit that it exists.Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.Look carefully at the two words in bold:
"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."
You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?
All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.
Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."
"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"
Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?
OK. So I take the word of his DNA. So that's supposed to mean that the other 5 thugs did NOT do the same thing he did ? They openly admitted it, you idiot.You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNAHa ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.
You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.
Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
They can do that now, IF they have a sample to check. Only reason Reyes DNA got checked years later is because he requested a transfer from his prison cellblock.Wrong againAll that needs to be done to prove these thugs were innocent is look through their text messages and photos in their cell phones and facebook. Cell phones and Facebook were about as widely used as DNA evidence was back mm in those days, right? No need to believe the Matt's word, just check his cell phone, dna, and facebook.You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNAHa ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.
There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.
You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.
Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
I applaud your ability to keep your political opponents spinning their wheels debating the guilt or innocence of the CP5, and away from discussion of what their guilt or innocence proves in regard to Trump's comments on them. I have learned to appreciate what you do on the board.
DNA existed. None of the boys DNA matched
They can also take DNA from hundreds of years ago and match it
Reyes was someone, not someone "else". His confession in no way exonerated the thugs, after their open admissions, all the evidence, and a perfectly valid jury trial.The case of the so-called "Central Park Five" is a wonderful manifestation of the Leftist counter-universe, where facts and evidence carry no weight. At the same time it is an outrageous demonstration of how Leftism can manipulate the justice system to promote its Narratives. And finally, with the transfer of MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS to these known criminals, Mayor DeBlasio shows how low a Leftist public official will go to grovel before the corrupt "Leaders" of their favored democrat victim groups.
Only in the Leftist Bizarro Universe can defendants who CONFESSED, WITH PARENTS AND LEGAL COUNSEL PRESENT, be deemed "innocent."
For those interested in the facts - and to be honest, they are too complex to fit on a bumper sticker - Ann Coulter has written copiously on this travesty, with citations to actual court records and contemporaneous news accounts. It's not pretty. Basically, there was a sixth attacker - whose existence was known at the trial, but whose identity was not - who later confessed from prison, and this truthful but irrelevant confession was deemed sufficient cause to "exonerate" the CP5, and award them millions in "damages" (without the bother of a lawsuit) from the City of NY.
As for Trump's comments being a manifestation of "racism," that is yet another illustration of Leftist Group-Think. Once you have been deemed a "racist" by the prominent poverty pimps, there is no hope of rehabilitation. To even seek it is folly...Mini-MIke B should take note.
Given the fact that someone else confessed to committing the crime, your post shows a disconnect from reality common in a specific type of white person-the white racist. As you practice racism, you think that blacks are too dumb to see the many ways racism is done in the modern era. We know that whites just cannot blatantly openly declare their racism and indi8viduyals ;like trump who want public attention could not just overtly make comments that would be obviously racist. The fact that white mass murderers and white rapists were committing crimes in NYC, Trump never called for the death penalty on them. But in the classic they're raping our women racist meme trump came forth and exposed himself.
This shows the lunacy & idiocy of liberals. Take a good hard look at what we're seeing in this thread. The pure definition of liberal lunacy/idiocy, with a hearty dose of anti-white racism thrown in.All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNAHa ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.
There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.
You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.
Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.
There were no such witnesses and there was no gang rape.
HERE is your "evidence", which a multi cultural jury saw and heard. It appears like you haven't. Here's the link that can fill you in. Better to know the facts, than come stumbling in here like a foolish buffoon -Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist, as you have just claimed here. Exclude non evidence items such as allegations, accusations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or "I already posted it on this forum somewhere but I can't tell you where".There is no leftist groupthink, physical evidence and a testimony by the person that committed the crime exonerated these innocent men. So they were wrongly done by people paid for by tax dollars, therefore they deserved restitution from those who wronged them. Racism doesn't work as you say son. Trump is called a racist because there is documented evidence of it.The case of the so-called "Central Park Five" is a wonderful manifestation of the Leftist counter-universe, where facts and evidence carry no weight. At the same time it is an outrageous demonstration of how Leftism can manipulate the justice system to promote its Narratives. And finally, with the transfer of MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS to these known criminals, Mayor DeBlasio shows how low a Leftist public official will go to grovel before the corrupt "Leaders" of their favored democrat victim groups.
Only in the Leftist Bizarro Universe can defendants who CONFESSED, WITH PARENTS AND LEGAL COUNSEL PRESENT, be deemed "innocent."
For those interested in the facts - and to be honest, they are too complex to fit on a bumper sticker - Ann Coulter has written copiously on this travesty, with citations to actual court records and contemporaneous news accounts. It's not pretty. Basically, there was a sixth attacker - whose existence was known at the trial, but whose identity was not - who later confessed from prison, and this truthful but irrelevant confession was deemed sufficient cause to "exonerate" the CP5, and award them millions in "damages" (without the bother of a lawsuit) from the City of NY.
As for Trump's comments being a manifestation of "racism," that is yet another illustration of Leftist Group-Think. Once you have been deemed a "racist" by the prominent poverty pimps, there is no hope of rehabilitation. To even seek it is folly...Mini-MIke B should take note.
You've been shown the evidence.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHTThere is no proof that there was any gang thereAll his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNAHa ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.
There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.
You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.
Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.
Liberal insanity.See post #66.There is no proof that there was any gang thereAll his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNAHa ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.
You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.
Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.
Fuck post 66. A person admitted to the crime and nothing you say ever occurred.
