Central Park 5 and Racism

[protectionist]

Ha ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.

You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.

Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.

According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.

There is no proof that there was any gang there

See post #66.

The witnesses, both victims and the perps, said there was a large gang.

There were no witnesses to the rape. The victim had no memory of it

Moot. Witnesses or not, the jerky kids laughed and joked and told the cops all they needed to know, well before any interrogations began. They concurred again in the trial.

Get the facts before talking.

 

[protectionist]

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.

According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.

There is no proof that there was any gang there

See post #66.

Fuck post 66. A person admitted to the crime and nothing you say ever occurred.

They were all juveniles and subjected to over ten hours of interrogation without parents or an attorney present.

What you got was interrogators telling each boy that the others had identified him as the rapist and that he had better come up with a confession about his role.

That is why each story was different with a different attacker.

Defense attorneys made that claim immersed in a mountain of prosecution evidence. Jury rejected it and agreed with the prosecution. You're not adding anything to this thread.

 

[mudwhistle]

I've seen thread after thread on this forum where lefties present the CP5 case as if it could somehow prove that Trump is a racist. Regardless of the guilt or innocence of the CP5 thugs, I have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump's comments about those thugs was because of race. I have started this thread to invite lefties to present all evidence that proves Trump's comments were racially motivated.

This thread is not meant for debate of their guilt or innocence, it is about evidence that proves Trump's comments about the CP5 thugs were about race. OK lefties, go ahead and post all the evidence that his comments were about race.

CP5 is just another political tool to mislead blacks.
This is why a biased media is so dangerous.

Whoever controls the media can literally get away with one suicide after another.

 

[protectionist]

All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.

According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.

There is no proof that there was any gang there

See post #66.

Fuck post 66. A person admitted to the crime and nothing you say ever occurred.

They were all juveniles and subjected to over ten hours of interrogation without parents or an attorney present.

What you got was interrogators telling each boy that the others had identified him as the rapist and that he had better come up with a confession about his role.

That is why each story was different with a different attacker.

Why even argue with this idiot? There was a confession by the person who committed the crime. That's it. Whatever that fool wants to believe he can believe it. He can believe in Santa Claus too.

This total dunce is coming here completely ignorant of how stupid his posts are. One read of this link will show that.

July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT

 

[protectionist]

All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.

According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.

There is no proof that there was any gang there

See post #66.

The witnesses, both victims and the perps, said there was a large gang.

There were no witnesses to the rape. The victim had no memory of it

Of course there were several witnesses to the gang rape.

There was also other victims who identified the CP 5. The gang rape wasn't the only crime they committed that night. They were on a violent crime spree with at least 9 separate victims. They were hiding in the foliage along the pathways and ambushing bicyclists and joggers.

There were two different crimes that night, the first was wilding where a group of over 30 teens were hassling and hitting random citizens.
The second was the savage rape of the jogger

They were not connected.

The boys were accused of the rape. Of which there is no evidence

No evidence of which you are knowledgeable. That's why you're unqualified to be in this thread.

July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT

 

[protectionist]

They were coerced into a confession.
After ten hours and no sleep they were told.......the others have already said you did the rape. You better come up with a story. Then they helped them with the details of the story

That woman was coerced into having sex and being a punching bag, but lefties want to make sure she does not get justice. Lefties want to dismiss what she endured for the ten hours she couldn't sleep so that they can push their political agenda about Trump making racist comments. It's pretty vile the punishment that lefties are dishing out to this poor victim, all for the politically motivated goal of smearing Trump.

She got justice
The man who did it is in prison.

The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million

That $45 million needs to be seized and given to the victims. The CP5 should all be rejailed, along with the screwball politicians who gave them that money.

 

[protectionist]

She got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million

She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.

The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."

It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.

There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.

Yet another example of how leftists will push their agenda, in reckless disregard for everything and anyone else.

 

[protectionist]

She got Justice
...
The CP 5 got justice to the tune of $45 million

She got the CP5 version of justice back then, and she is getting justice today from all the lefties of today who hate her for being attacked by blacks.

The CP5 got their justice in the form of 45 million bucks, some free punching bag practice, and the cheap thrill of feeling up her tits while she received her "justice."

It is pretty vile how lefties want to dismiss the horrible things that the CP5 did, just so they can advance their political agenda of smearing Trump. Worse yet, how they will NEVER be able to successfully smear Trump over this, but they will dismiss what happened to the CP5 victims just for the opportunity to try.

There is only one reason why lefties defend the CP5 monsters, and it is because they want to smear Trump to advance their political agenda. Make no mistake, lefties absolutely DO NOT give a shit about the victim or if the CP5 are actually guilty or innocent, lefties ONLY care about advancing the political agenda of smearing Trump.

The CP5 did no horrible things. They were exonerated fully and those who wrongfully convicted them had to pay $45 million

They had clean records before the arrest and clean records ever since.

I'd call you a liar if I thought you had the foggiest idea of what you were talking about.

 

[protectionist]

Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....

"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."

"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”

But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.

According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"

Look carefully at the two words in bold:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?

All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.

Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."

I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.

"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"

It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.

Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?

Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.

Name one shred of this alleged "plethora"

 

[protectionist]

View attachment 308344

This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.

How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?

Are you referring to a dismissed case? I certainly hope you are not dumb enough to think a dismissed case is evidence of guilt...

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

Yes I am. I know you're both illiterate and dishonest but a dismissed case can be for various reasons. You should link exactly what happened instead of cutting and pasting the part you want to believe. Here you go....

"Federal investigators found that Trump employees marked black applicant’s applications with a “C” for “colored” and steered black and Puerto Rican renters to buildings with fewer white tenants, according to court filings by the government, The Washington Post reported."

"The complaint against Fred Trump and Donald Trump was “dismissed against them in their personal capacity, with prejudice.”

But the agreement includes some specific terms that had to be met by the Trumps, including the addition of the words “Equal Housing Opportunity” and the fair housing logo on all of their advertising. Beyond that, the agreement included a page-long description of how they were ordered to insert a monthly ad “at least 3 inches in length” in “a newspaper of general circulation” showing available apartments.

According to an article in The New York Times in June 1975, the day after the agreement was reached, Donald Trump said that the agreement was to their “full satisfaction” because it didn’t have “any requirement that would compel the Trump organization to accept persons on welfare as tenants unless as qualified as any other tenant.”"

Look carefully at the two words in bold:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?

All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.

Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."

Or things that happened 40 years ago.

 

[protectionist]

Look carefully at the two words in bold:

"It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that in
consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein, the complaint against Fred C.
Trump and Donald J. Trump is dismissed against them in their
personal capacity, with prejudice, as to all allegations
contained therein, and predating this Order."

You are attempting to present "allegations" that were classified specifically as allegations by the court when the case was dismissed. Yes, the case was indeed dismissed. Allegations are not evidence of anything, and allegations that are dismissed by the court when a case is dismissed are worth even less. It is absolutely stupid to attempt to present a dismissed case as evidence of guilt. Are lefties really stupid enough to do such a thing?

All real estate companies have to comply with the same fair housing laws that Trump's company did, and you are a bigot if you think it is some kind of punishment that Trump had to comply with the same fair housing laws as everybody else.

Once again, I ask if you have any evidence that Trump is a racist that is not "allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or that you posted evidence already."

I'd rather look at the evidence of them being guilty and making a bargain.

"consideration of their affirmative assumption of responsibility
contained in part III herein,"

It is time for you to accept that the case was in fact dismissed by the court, and time to accept that the court has classified everything about the case predating their order as allegations. The court dismissed these "allegations" with prejudice, which means lefties can't decide 50 years later that "dismissed" somehow means guilty.

Do you have any idea how crazy it is to be presenting a dismissed case as evidence of guilt? Have you no shame?

Its time for you to accept the fact that there is a plethora of evidence that Drumpf is a racist orange bigot.

I'd be glad to admit all evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but I have to see it in order to admit it. Please post evidence that proves Trump is a racist, but leave out non evidence items such as allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, propaganda, or claims that you already posted it somewhere. Just post actual evidence that proves he is a racist, and I will admit that it exists.

You cant see the evidence because your face is stuck too far up Drumpfs ass. So you go on trying to convince yourself he isnt a racist and I will go on knowing he is a racist.

WHAT "evidence" ?

 

[EvMetro]

There was no evidence proving them guilty

Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.

There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.

Ha ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.

You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.

Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

OK. So I take the word of his DNA. So that's supposed to mean that the other 5 thugs did NOT do the same thing he did ? They openly admitted it, you idiot.

Try to get a lefty to post evidence that Trump's comments on the CP5 were racially motivated. They will have you right back debating the innocence or guilt of the CP5 so fast you won't know what happened. They want to keep you in this endless debate of innocence or guilt.

 

[The Purge]

I've seen thread after thread on this forum where lefties present the CP5 case as if it could somehow prove that Trump is a racist. Regardless of the guilt or innocence of the CP5 thugs, I have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump's comments about those thugs was because of race. I have started this thread to invite lefties to present all evidence that proves Trump's comments were racially motivated.

This thread is not meant for debate of their guilt or innocence, it is about evidence that proves Trump's comments about the CP5 thugs were about race. OK lefties, go ahead and post all the evidence that his comments were about race.

Nice strawman. Too bad he can't stand up. Better luck next time.

The CP5 case is a classic demonstration of how Rump doesn't have the balls to admit when he's wrong. CLASSIC.

That's got nothing to do with his orange race but everything to do with his pathetic narcissism.

 

[Pogo]

I've seen thread after thread on this forum where lefties present the CP5 case as if it could somehow prove that Trump is a racist. Regardless of the guilt or innocence of the CP5 thugs, I have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump's comments about those thugs was because of race. I have started this thread to invite lefties to present all evidence that proves Trump's comments were racially motivated.

This thread is not meant for debate of their guilt or innocence, it is about evidence that proves Trump's comments about the CP5 thugs were about race. OK lefties, go ahead and post all the evidence that his comments were about race.

Nice strawman. Too bad he can't stand up. Better luck next time.

The CP5 case is a classic demonstration of how Rump doesn't have the balls to admit when he's wrong. CLASSIC.

That's got nothing to do with his orange race but everything to do with his pathetic narcissism.

Tell it to the OP, chump. He does. Got two hundred posts on it too soooooooo......

 

[The Purge]

I've seen thread after thread on this forum where lefties present the CP5 case as if it could somehow prove that Trump is a racist. Regardless of the guilt or innocence of the CP5 thugs, I have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump's comments about those thugs was because of race. I have started this thread to invite lefties to present all evidence that proves Trump's comments were racially motivated.

This thread is not meant for debate of their guilt or innocence, it is about evidence that proves Trump's comments about the CP5 thugs were about race. OK lefties, go ahead and post all the evidence that his comments were about race.

Nice strawman. Too bad he can't stand up. Better luck next time.

The CP5 case is a classic demonstration of how Rump doesn't have the balls to admit when he's wrong. CLASSIC.

That's got nothing to do with his orange race but everything to do with his pathetic narcissism.

Tell it to the OP, chump. He does. Got two hundred posts on it too soooooooo......

And like the good Monkey. You join in....can't let a chance encounter with your nonsense go unchallenged!...ROTFLMFAO!

 

[EvMetro]

I've seen thread after thread on this forum where lefties present the CP5 case as if it could somehow prove that Trump is a racist. Regardless of the guilt or innocence of the CP5 thugs, I have NEVER seen a shred of evidence that proves Trump's comments about those thugs was because of race. I have started this thread to invite lefties to present all evidence that proves Trump's comments were racially motivated.

This thread is not meant for debate of their guilt or innocence, it is about evidence that proves Trump's comments about the CP5 thugs were about race. OK lefties, go ahead and post all the evidence that his comments were about race.

Nice strawman. Too bad he can't stand up. Better luck next time.

The CP5 case is a classic demonstration of how Rump doesn't have the balls to admit when he's wrong. CLASSIC.

That's got nothing to do with his orange race but everything to do with his pathetic narcissism.

Tell it to the OP, chump. He does. Got two hundred posts on it too soooooooo......

Not just any old 200 posts either. 200 posts of lefties not being able to produce a shred of evidence that Trump's comments on the CP5 were racially motivated, and 200 posts of lefties either steering the thread toward the debate of their innocence or guilt, or posting other stuff like what you have posted in order to evade the topic.

 

[rightwinger]

There was no evidence proving them guilty

Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.

There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.

Ha ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.

You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.

Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

OK. So I take the word of his DNA. So that's supposed to mean that the other 5 thugs did NOT do the same thing he did ? They openly admitted it, you idiot.

There were millions of New Yorkers who did not leave DNA at the scene that night. The CP5 were among them

However, those millions were not minors who were deprived of sleep and threatened in order to get a confession

 

[The Purge]

Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.

There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.

Ha ha. Oh yeah, let's all take the word of Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer, and serial rapist, who killed his own mother, who only "confessed" in order to get removed from the same cellblock as Corey Wise, and whose "confession" had no negative effect on him, since the statute of limitations had already run out, plus he was already in for life.

You're either lying to protect rapists and murderers, or you simply are clueless of the facts.

Oh Sure, let's disregard all the evidence of the case, settled by a multicultural jury, and just take the word of a criminal psycho, with a vested interest, right ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

OK. So I take the word of his DNA. So that's supposed to mean that the other 5 thugs did NOT do the same thing he did ? They openly admitted it, you idiot.

There were millions of New Yorkers who did not leave DNA at the scene that night. The CP5 were among them

However, those millions were not minors who were deprived of sleep and threatened in order to get a confession

And why were those 5 picked out of millions?

 

[EvMetro]

We should thank rightwinger for posting what Trump's comments were about in post 80. Rightwinger proved that Trump's comments about the CP5 were not racially motivated, and that we should all thank Trump for watching out for the community and people of all races. Rightwinger made fools of lefties like Asclepias , IM2 , and Pogo in his post 80.

View attachment 308344

 

[rightwinger]

You don’t have to take the word of Matias Reyes. You can take the word of his DNA

All his DNA proves is that he was also involved in the gang rape.

According to eye witnesses, at least 9 of the gang of 30+ thugs were at the rape scene.

There is no proof that there was any gang there

See post #66.

The witnesses, both victims and the perps, said there was a large gang.

There were no witnesses to the rape. The victim had no memory of it

Moot. Witnesses or not, the jerky kids laughed and joked and told the cops all they needed to know, well before any interrogations began. They concurred again in the trial.

Get the facts before talking.

They recanted their confessions shortly after they were recorded

You know, when they weren’t being threatened and bullied