Chain smoker Obama writes another law and bans smoking in welfare housing

[ShootSpeeders]

Odds are you pay at least some of their medical bills. And they may start a fire that spreads to your house or apt. It is your business. THINK

So can candles. You want to ban those too?

Hey einstein. Does the word probability mean anything to you?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Another law to be ignored.

Yup. I'm sure no one will be inspecting those welfare housing units and you know it will be ignored.

Even if they ignore, people that smoke will live in fear of being evicted.

 

[norwegen]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

Smoking is banned on the premises of government facilities.

But then, only a progressive Democratic government would pick and choose those to subject to its laws.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Does this ban include smoking pot?

Yes idiot. Doesn't ban alcohol or prescription pills which are much worse though.

Worse only to the ignorant. What's more, alcohol and prescription pill users don't arrogantly inject their substance into others.

^ Just proved your own embarrassing ignorance

You're digging deeper into your own ignorance and arrogance.

 

[WillowTree]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

 

[WillowTree]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

I think an assessment can be made as to why they are in gov housing if they can afford cigarettes. Cigarettes are expensive.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

I think an assessment can be made as to why they are in gov housing if they can afford cigarettes. Cigarettes are expensive.

Maybe, they take the bus, don't go to the movies or eat out. There are a lot of ways to save money, and if they choose to spend their savings on cigarettes, they should not be penalized for it.

 

[WillowTree]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

I think an assessment can be made as to why they are in gov housing if they can afford cigarettes. Cigarettes are expensive.

Maybe, they take the bus, don't go to the movies or eat out. There are a lot of ways to save money, and if they choose to spend their savings on cigarettes, they should not be penalized for it.

If they choose to smoke cigarettes the TAXPAYER should not be on the hook for their fucking housing.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If they have a rear patio or a balcony, they should be allowed to smoke. Outside is adequate. People are becoming paranoid of a little bit of smoke.

How about household cleaners and chemicals. Also new furniture and carpets give off a lot of damaging chemicals.

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

I think an assessment can be made as to why they are in gov housing if they can afford cigarettes. Cigarettes are expensive.

Maybe, they take the bus, don't go to the movies or eat out. There are a lot of ways to save money, and if they choose to spend their savings on cigarettes, they should not be penalized for it.

If they choose to smoke cigarettes the TAXPAYER should not be on the hook for their fucking housing.

You cannot expect them to live like monks.

 

[WillowTree]

They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

I think an assessment can be made as to why they are in gov housing if they can afford cigarettes. Cigarettes are expensive.

Maybe, they take the bus, don't go to the movies or eat out. There are a lot of ways to save money, and if they choose to spend their savings on cigarettes, they should not be penalized for it.

If they choose to smoke cigarettes the TAXPAYER should not be on the hook for their fucking housing.

You cannot expect them to live like monks.

Why should I be expected to subsidize their bad habits? How about if they choose to smoke then I get to spend my tax money on my own damn family? Cigarettes are probably about seven bucks a day. That is 210.00 or more per month or $2,400.00 per year. Now you explain that to the taxpayer. Go ahead.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
They should go sit in their cars and smoke, hell, if they can afford to smoke what are they doing in government housing?

Now there's a good point. Smoking is very expensive. Welfare bums shouldn't be allowed to smoke anywhere.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Cars are far more expensive than smoking, and they should have the freedom to stand outside and smoke, as long as it is outside. You cannot ration freedom. Freedom is for all.

Cars are very useful Now tell us what use are cigarettes. You are dumbkopf!!!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This will be one of those regulations Trump will void.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

This will be one of those regulations Trump will void.

Should he?. This is not a bad idea, but it should be done by congress.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

This will be one of those regulations Trump will void.

Should he?. This is not a bad idea, but it should be done by congress.

Was it written by congress? Obuthole illegally signed it Trump can legally undo it.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

If Obama is a smoker himself and I've heard it said that he is, passing a law like this one only makes him look like a hypocrite...unless he is trying to get himself cleaned up.

God bless you and him always!!!

Holly