geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
I will when I get the chance present the arguement that mutations is not the mechanism to macro-evolution. Macro-evolution and micro-evolution are independent of each other. One actually takes place while the other does not. Your side in their opinions is going way beyond the adaptations that is observed.
Macroevolution and microevolution are "different" only to people who are desperate to try and come up with some sort of intelligent-sounding argument against evolution. For people who have actually formally studied evolution, it's a lame semantics argument that is too asinine to argue. As I said before, it's like saying you believe in a penny but not a quarter.
Again, all this is aside the point. You are entitled to believe whatever you want. You aren't entitled to call it a valid scientific point.
So, feel free to propose a scientifically valid alternative to evolution and argue it until your heart is content. However, you should know that the scientific method refuses to entertain supernatural powers as an explanation for anything.