Chief Justice Roberts Still Working For The Deep State (Bush..Obama...The Clintons)

[mudwhistle]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

 

[2aguy]

The next impeachment......Removal of Roberts from the Supreme Court.....President Trump can replace him....

 

[Penelope]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

 

[tyroneweaver]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

So what.
Strange how schiffs staff are all involved in this.
Yet, you of all people don't want the truth.

 

[mudwhistle]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

There is no law that protects the identity of the whistleblower.
There is only a regulation that protects the whistleblower from being punished for acting as a whistleblower.....yet Obama punished whistleblowers on a consistent basis while he was president.

 

[bullwinkle]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Mud, what would an ideal America look like to you? I ask because of your obvious malice towards any thing or anyone that maybe might could possibly cause the mildest hindrance to Trump's Monarchy. Constitution? Get rid of it! Equal branches of Government (mild suspicion the Chief Justice may not kiss the ring?) Impeach him! Power of the purse? Invalid, take from military for personal aggrandizement! Trials without witnesses? Who needs facts when what you don't want to see could change an outcome?

My days are numbered, mud, but yours will feel the brunt of loss of the blessed gift you are throwing away.

 

[theHawk]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

Whistleblower laws are to protect individuals who expose systemic issues within a company or institution. Accusing an individual of a crime doesn’t magically dissolve the sixth amendment rights of the defendant. Wrongfully accusing an individual of a crime does not absolve one for being held responsible for their lies.

 

[theHawk]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Roberts is a turncoat. Rush Limbaugh was right about him and predicted he would back HusseinCare.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Mud, what would an ideal America look like to you? I ask because of your obvious malice towards any thing or anyone that maybe might could possibly cause the mildest hindrance to Trump's Monarchy. Constitution? Get rid of it! Equal branches of Government (mild suspicion the Chief Justice may not kiss the ring?) Impeach him! Power of the purse? Invalid, take from military for personal aggrandizement! Trials without witnesses? Who needs facts when what you don't want to see could change an outcome?

My days are numbered, mud, but yours will feel the brunt of loss of the blessed gift you are throwing away.

Trumpers as with most conservatives want a dictator...they have always wanted a dictator....

Everything they accuse the "evil Dems" of doing is shit they consistently keep getting caught doing themselves, over and over and over again...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Roberts is a turncoat. Rush Limbaugh was right about him and predicted he would back HusseinCare.

I predicted that Trump will take credit for Obamacare....and he did....

Did that bother you or do you not mind when your cult leader does it??

Trump Takes Credit For Obamacare, Says Democrats Want to Repeal It

 

[Penelope]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

Whistleblower laws are to protect individuals who expose systemic issues within a company or institution. Accusing an individual of a crime doesn’t magically dissolve the sixth amendment rights of the defendant. Wrongfully accusing an individual of a crime does not absolve one for being held responsible for their lies.

LOL, he exposed tramp, a corrupt individual.

 

[Penelope]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Schiff is doing an awesome job of it, but it wont turn the fearful republicans , they are so damn scared of tramp they are probably incontinent at the thought of him having their "head on a pike".

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Schiff is doing an awesome job of it, but it wont turn the fearful republicans , they are so damn scared of tramp they are probably incontinent at the thought of him having their "head on a pike".

You are correct, the Republican party is spineless.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Schiff is doing an awesome job of it, but it wont turn the fearful republicans , they are so damn scared of tramp they are probably incontinent at the thought of him having their "head on a pike".

They are not so much scared of Trump -- most of them hate Trump..as a human being, they detest him....but they are not scared of him so much as they are scared of Trump voters...

Or as I like to call them....republicans.....

These voters existed before Trump and will exist after Trump...republicans are the problem

 

[mudwhistle]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Mud, what would an ideal America look like to you? I ask because of your obvious malice towards any thing or anyone that maybe might could possibly cause the mildest hindrance to Trump's Monarchy. Constitution? Get rid of it! Equal branches of Government (mild suspicion the Chief Justice may not kiss the ring?) Impeach him! Power of the purse? Invalid, take from military for personal aggrandizement! Trials without witnesses? Who needs facts when what you don't want to see could change an outcome?

My days are numbered, mud, but yours will feel the brunt of loss of the blessed gift you are throwing away.

Pure hyperbole.
If anything.....Democrats prove every day that Trump is not above the law but instead THEY show us how much above the law THEY are. They're never held accountable for their actions.

 

[mudwhistle]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Roberts is a turncoat. Rush Limbaugh was right about him and predicted he would back HusseinCare.

I predicted that Trump will take credit for Obamacare....and he did....

Did that bother you or do you not mind when your cult leader does it??

Trump Takes Credit For Obamacare, Says Democrats Want to Repeal It

You're fucking crazy if you think Trump wants to take blame for Obama's biggest failure.

 

[mudwhistle]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Schiff is doing an awesome job of it, but it wont turn the fearful republicans , they are so damn scared of tramp they are probably incontinent at the thought of him having their "head on a pike".

Schiff makes Marsha Clarke look brilliant.

 

[theHawk]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Roberts is a turncoat. Rush Limbaugh was right about him and predicted he would back HusseinCare.

I predicted that Trump will take credit for Obamacare....and he did....

Did that bother you or do you not mind when your cult leader does it??

Trump Takes Credit For Obamacare, Says Democrats Want to Repeal It

There you go, lying again. He didn’t take credit for “ObamaCare”, he in fact got the individual mandate overturned. Of course Dems are up in arms and want to undo that, so in fact they do want to repeal that change. President Trump took credit for keeping pre-existing conditions because he chose to keep those in. But the left has to lie about that too and claim they were taken out merely because insurance companies can charge less for healthy people. Pre-existing conditions means the insurance has to cover you, and that is still there, it is not tied to how much they can charge you.

You should try reading your articles before posting them, you might discover they don’t even prove their own stupid click bait headlines designed to dupe moronic shitbags like yourself.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Chief Justice Roberts is the reason that Obamacare was allowed to exist. He literally re-wrote the law to make it constitutional when it passed thru the Supreme Court. After all....it is unconstitutional to force anyone to buy a product, which is what Obamacare is. The Obama Administration team lied to the Supreme Court that Obamacare wasn't a tax.....but when it came to a vote, Justice Roberts changed the law to a tax....rendering it constitutional. So we're left with this huge ultra-expensive piece of crap health care bill that was literally designed to fail so the Deep State could get Single-Payer.

The Democrats specialize in fraud. The latest is their fake impeachment, and the Chief Justice is helping the Democrats cover up who started it all. The identity of the whistleblower isn't a state secret, yet everyone in the media and on the left treats it like it is. This is a breach of the president's right to face his accusers. We are not allowed to know who the Democrats met with and used as an excuse to impeach the president because then everyone will know without a doubt that the whole premise was based on a fake claim.

Sen Rand Paul attempted to expose this fact twice and Chief Justice Roberts refused to allow his question to be asked during the trial.

Senator Rand Paul: My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.


​

The Democrats by law have sealed the acquittal of the president by not allowing the president to face his accusers. According the the sixth amendment...the president should have been acquitted already. Justice Roberts knows this only too well.

If the person reporting the transgression is not present, then the judge will issue a verdict of not guilty. The judge, in doing so, is actually reaching back to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment (facing one's accusers), which, with the genius of the Founding Fathers, is actually built out from English Common Law and even Roman law. The Sixth Amendment is one of the foundational stones upon which our entire edifice of a fair system of justice is built.


Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation.

​

If the past is prologue for this entire sham process, and a witness can lie with impunity, and the president's accusers can use "disorderly language" to attack him with no consequences, and President Trump cannot face his accusers, then shame on everyone involved, and this has gone much too far. End it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/chief_justice_john_roberts_strikes_out.html​

Roberts is a turncoat. Rush Limbaugh was right about him and predicted he would back HusseinCare.

I predicted that Trump will take credit for Obamacare....and he did....

Did that bother you or do you not mind when your cult leader does it??

Trump Takes Credit For Obamacare, Says Democrats Want to Repeal It

You're fucking crazy if you think Trump wants to take blame for Obama's biggest failure.

He already did you dumb ass....

Christ....he literally got on camera and took credit for Obamacare...and you dic suckers still deny it....

When republicans were getting wiped out in 2018 -- out of desperation, even they started trying to campaign on protecting Obamacare...you trumpers are pathetic...

Republicans tried to kill Obamacare. Now they’re embracing its most popular part.

 

[theHawk]

He was trying to out the whistleblower.

Whistleblower laws are to protect individuals who expose systemic issues within a company or institution. Accusing an individual of a crime doesn’t magically dissolve the sixth amendment rights of the defendant. Wrongfully accusing an individual of a crime does not absolve one for being held responsible for their lies.

LOL, he exposed tramp, a corrupt individual.

Uh-huh, he exposed that President Trump wanted to investigate corruption. That’s President Trump’s biggest sin, exposing the corruption of Democrats.