NGSamson
Active Member
- Jul 27, 2011
- 755
- 69
the whole myth that the child died because he was denied treatment is false. She could have taken him anywhere and gotten treatment. She didn't because she's either brain dead, or drugged, and attorneys latched onto it.
She was trained through a system of generational welfare to depend on the system to address her needs. This gos back to the beginnings of welfare programs. As the economy gets tougher, and food stamps get harder to get, you will see similar cases involving starvation. In a way, the child and to a lesser degree the woman are victims of the system. This is the system our current President wants for all of us. Think about that when you pull the lever at voting time.