Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Christian activists booted from Seattle coffee shop: ‘I’m gay. You have to leave’
Gay coffee shop owner boots out pro-life Christians, refusing them service.
Well, it's time to put these motherfuckers out of business!!!
Good they are an obnoxious bunch. No its time to kick these zealots out. Move to Saudi Arabia, you can get all the preaching you want there.
In shariah law ---preaching a religion OTHER than islam is a CAPITAL OFFENSE. It is probably dangerous for a Shiite to preach SHIITISM over there------I don't have any examples
After all this time, this is the first time I heard they wanted the baker to be part of their gay marriage.
By forcing a baker to make their cake, the baker has indeed become a part of their wedding ceremony.
Lost in the land of denial, another one plays the great pretend game.What does sexual orientation have to do with making out, and it's acceptance in a coffee shop or hotel lobby?...and what does that scenario, which didn't happen, have to do with events in this thread that did happen?...what parallel are you attempting to draw?
After all this time, this is the first time I heard they wanted the baker to be part of their gay marriage.
By forcing a baker to make their cake, the baker has indeed become a part of their wedding ceremony.
Where is this "right of association" and how do you think it applies?What does pro-life have to do with doing the bone dance with Mr. Sphincter?I support the business owners.
Nothing. Either we have a right to association or not.
After all this time, this is the first time I heard they wanted the baker to be part of their gay marriage.
By forcing a baker to make their cake, the baker has indeed become a part of their wedding ceremony.
My response----it seems to me that a store owner has a right to eject people who enter their premises for the purpose of proselytizing
The article didn't state that they were "proselytizing" in the coffee shop. If they were, I would agree with you. If not, then it seems pretty intolerant.
I have always supported public accomodation laws.
I was going to say that I personally would not want to hang out in a place where I didn't like the people, but that turns out to not be true at all.
I still come here.
Then after pretending, draws nether conclusion and directs away from her insanity by insinuation....typical libtard game here.Lost in the land of denial, another one plays the great pretend game.What does sexual orientation have to do with making out, and it's acceptance in a coffee shop or hotel lobby?...and what does that scenario, which didn't happen, have to do with events in this thread that did happen?...what parallel are you attempting to draw?
Someday I'm might do a study on the tendency toward hypotheticals by political affiliation...this board might be a good place to start.
The Washington Times is a broadsheet founded and owned by a nutty religious cult known as the Moonies. They are known for a lot of things but serious journalism is not one of them.Christian activists booted from Seattle coffee shop: ‘I’m gay. You have to leave’
Gay coffee shop owner boots out pro-life Christians, refusing them service.
Well, it's time to put these motherfuckers out of business!!!
Which is why I chose to be intellectually consistent in My stances. I'm not sure how the coffee shop owner knows the patron is Christian, it's not like being a Christian is a distinguishable trait.I'm not sure what the problem is. If you stand up and say that gays cannot force a baker to serve a gay couple, how is it you have a problem with a gay not serving a straight person?Christian activists booted from Seattle coffee shop: ‘I’m gay. You have to leave’
Gay coffee shop owner boots out pro-life Christians, refusing them service.
Well, it's time to put these motherfuckers out of business!!!
I support the right of business owners to refuse to do business with people, for any reason they choose.
I believe this thread was posted to illustrate the irony (a kinder, gentler word than hypocrisy) in supporting the attitude - 'You must serve me because I'm gay, but because I'm gay I don't have to serve you.'
I, too, support the right of a business owner to refuse service - but the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes that refusal 'selective'. If the group was kicked out because of their religious affiliation, they may have a case in court.
Two overused clichés, but in this instance they fit - 'what goes around comes around' and 'be careful what you wish for'. When you step on another's right's with the law, you eventually step on your own. Hopefully the LGBT militants will 'get it' in the end.
They need to sue just to make the point as this chit of private ownership needs to be addressed and finalized. We are either a free country with rights to what we own, our own thoughts, right of self determination and beliefs or we are a communist country where the state and whomever is in charge at the moment gets to decide what you can and cannot do with your own privately own property/businesses, etc..No, it is not. I get real tired of people trying to change the issue to suit their own intellectual dishonesty.I'm not sure what the problem is. If you stand up and say that gays cannot force a baker to serve a gay couple, how is it you have a problem with a gay not serving a straight person?Christian activists booted from Seattle coffee shop: ‘I’m gay. You have to leave’
Gay coffee shop owner boots out pro-life Christians, refusing them service.
Well, it's time to put these motherfuckers out of business!!!
I support the right of business owners to refuse to do business with people, for any reason the choose.
The issue isn't serving a gay couple. The issue is when you ask a baker to be a part of something that they consider sinful, such as same-sex marriage. After all, I've never heard of a baker refusing to make a birthday cake for a gay person.
You can't eat your cake and have it too.
Either a business owner has the right to refuse service to whomever they wish, for whatever reason they wish, or they do not.
You cannot say they can when it suits My personal philosophy and they can't when its something I don't like.
Pick one and stop trying to justify everything.
Again I asked, where is this right stated? Bill of rights?Where is this "right of association" and how do you think it applies?What does pro-life have to do with doing the bone dance with Mr. Sphincter?I support the business owners.
Nothing. Either we have a right to association or not.
Freedom of Assembly. It applies in that this owner doesn't want his business associated with these people.
By forcing the owner to serve them coffee, the owner has indeed become a part of their pro-life protest.