Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Democrat can be bigoted without bigotry being a Democratic party value. The Democratic party has been criticized since the 1960s for fighting bigotry, while the GOP had a Chairman of the national Republican party publicly apologize for the bigotry of the GOP.
A Democrat can be bigoted without bigotry being a Democratic party value.
Oh look, yet another lefty hypocrite.
A Democrat can be bigoted without bigotry being a Democratic party value. The Democratic party has been criticized since the 1960s for fighting bigotry, while the GOP had a Chairman of the national Republican party publicly apologize for the bigotry of the GOP.
if they were fighting Bigotry in the 60's,why were they against civil rights for blacks back then?......and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
...and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
A Democrat can be bigoted without bigotry being a Democratic party value. The Democratic party has been criticized since the 1960s for fighting bigotry, while the GOP had a Chairman of the national Republican party publicly apologize for the bigotry of the GOP.
if they were fighting Bigotry in the 60's,why were they against civil rights for blacks back then?......and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
In the 1960's Democrats fought for the civil rights of blacks and most all the white southern racists all left the party (some stayed and reformed) and went into the welcoming arms of the GOP.
President Johnson told the Democratic party they would loose the Southern vote for a generation.
USATODAY.com - GOP: 'We were wrong' to play racial politics
GOP: 'We were wrong' to play racial politics
Democracy is a messy business, no?
...and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
The people who voted against gay marriage in CA were not all Democrats.
California voters now favor gay marriage. go figure (polls)
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
So why did religious Californians (many minorities who the Democrats and gay groups fought for) come out in numbers sufficient to deny gay people marriage rights?
Oh the irony!
Democracy is a messy business, no?
Democracy is a messy business, no?
Hence our republican form of government, Constitution, and rule of law.
if they were fighting Bigotry in the 60's,why were they against civil rights for blacks back then?......and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
In the 1960's Democrats fought for the civil rights of blacks and most all the white southern racists all left the party (some stayed and reformed) and went into the welcoming arms of the GOP.
President Johnson told the Democratic party they would loose the Southern vote for a generation.
USATODAY.com - GOP: 'We were wrong' to play racial politics
GOP: 'We were wrong' to play racial politics
Did I fail to mention the GOP leader who apologized was gay and hid it so his party would not have to deal with yet another issue they riled up the base over?
How ironic Ken headed a party that used gay issues as wedge issues to win elections?
...and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
The people who voted against gay marriage in CA were not all Democrats.
California voters now favor gay marriage. go figure (polls)
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
So why did religious Californians (many minorities who the Democrats and gay groups fought for) come out in numbers sufficient to deny gay people marriage rights?
Oh the irony!
Democracy is a messy business, no?
so you just cant come out and just say.....Democrats by and large are just as much against gay marriage as anyone else,in spite of what they say.....
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
and so here you are saying that California Democrats listen to what religious bigots have to say......interesting....
you know what Dante,i work in a pretty Democratic Union type of place.....i would say overwhelmingly the Democratic men anyhow, were against gay marriage period.....and they did not need the Mormons telling them that....
"I am adhering to what I've said since this bill was first introduced an issue of this magnitude and importance, which requires a constitutional amendment, should be left to the people of New Jersey to decide,"
Seems like he wants the people to make the decision. And you have a problem with this?
...and explain in your best Democratic value way......why did the heavily Democratic Californians reject Gay Marriage twice.....
The people who voted against gay marriage in CA were not all Democrats.
California voters now favor gay marriage. go figure (polls)
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
So why did religious Californians (many minorities who the Democrats and gay groups fought for) come out in numbers sufficient to deny gay people marriage rights?
Oh the irony!
Democracy is a messy business, no?
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
and so here you are saying that California Democrats listen to what religious bigots have to say......interesting....
you know what Dante,i work in a pretty Democratic Union type of place.....i would say overwhelmingly the Democratic men anyhow, were against gay marriage period.....and they did not need the Mormons telling them that....
The people who voted against gay marriage in CA were not all Democrats.
California voters now favor gay marriage. go figure (polls)
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
So why did religious Californians (many minorities who the Democrats and gay groups fought for) come out in numbers sufficient to deny gay people marriage rights?
Oh the irony!
Democracy is a messy business, no?
And we all know it was the religious bigots who paid for all the ads that pushed public pinion.
and so here you are saying that California Democrats listen to what religious bigots have to say......interesting....
you know what Dante,i work in a pretty Democratic Union type of place.....i would say overwhelmingly the Democratic men anyhow, were against gay marriage period.....and they did not need the Mormons telling them that....
I never said there were no religious bigots in the Democratic party. I will say the Democratic party rarely if ever benefits from gay marriage being an issue at the polls.
Republicans have been at the forefront of protecting traditional marriage laws, both in the states and in Congress. A Republican Congress enacted the Defense of Marriage Act, affirming the right of states not to recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states. Unbelievably, the Democratic Party has now pledged to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which would subject every state to the redefinition of marriage by a judge without ever allowing the people to vote on the matter. We also urge Congress to use its Article III, Section 2 power to prevent activist federal judges from imposing upon the rest of the nation the judicial activism in Massachusetts and California. We also encourage states to review their marriage and divorce laws in order to strengthen marriage.
http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Values.htm#6
We see this over and over again. About everything. When it comes on this strong, it's deep hatred. Hatred that comes from such things as racism.
I'm still waiting for any religious type to explain to me how two gays getting married effects their straight marriage in any way, shape or form.
It has everything to do with moral and spiritual decay in civilization.
Since the late 1960's we have had moral decay.
Couples living together. Sex without marriage.
Drug abuse, porn, sex trafficking, alcoholism and homosexuality,pedophiles and beastlility.
Whenever these type of sins become accepted by society, civilization starts to decay and fall.
All of this leads to the decline of the family unit. A husband and wife who raise their families. When things go well with the family, life is worth living, when the family falters, life falls apart.
When deadly sins like pedophiles, beastiality and homosexuality are accepted it decays the moral and spiritual values in a well ordered civilization.
Families are the foundation of a nation.
When sins are accepted in society you will always see a rise in all other types of sins.
Even a very liberal state like the voters in California see that homosexuality is wrong. The majority of this nation sees it as wrong.
This is why gay's are trying to get their rights through the courts and legislature.
The majority of Americans agree that same sex couples should have the same rights and benefits enjoyed by married couples, but it should be done by laws for them not marriage.
Where are all those lefties that stated in the last thread on Gay marriage that it was not a Civil Right?
in your head
Fuck off retard, at least 3 people posted in that last thread that gay marriage was not a civil right, 3 lefties. One has already posted in this thread once.
