Chuck and Nancy forcing nat'l parks to go to seed

[BWK]

Without a federal government, there is only anarchy. Is that what you want?

Our federal govt has a limited set of powers. They have been abusing the constitution since lincoln.
Fuck them.
We still have state and local govts. Also, we have people. THE people.

Link to the factual instances where the federal government has been abusing the Constitution?

We have the people? What people? Who are these people? I don't know them, do you? I don't know you. Do you think I'm going to trust you who I do not know to look after my well being? Lol! Not even on a bet.

An state and local governments? What about them? Without federal oversight of state and local governments, they are useless.

So you are going to trust the government?

A hell of a lot more than state and local governments. Have you ever lived in a small town? Man please. Those son of a bucks will rob you blind.

Can you answer the question? Do you trust the government?

You never answered my question. Why should I answer yours?

 

[BWK]

/——/ Politico? LOL

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check?

/——/ Politico? LOL

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Do you have any idea how much of a fool you are making of yourself by linking Right wing opinion pieces? Not one sentence from that site documents anything from Factcheck.org that is categorically false with backup documentation, proving such a thing. The whole article is an opinion, based on nothing tangible for us to dissect. Lol! Why do you continue to make shit up,via Right-wing propaganda sites?

 

[BWK]

. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

Factcheck is a liberal outfit bwk. It would be like saying CNN or the DNC "debunked" it.

Do you know what Fake News is?

If that were true, you'd have documented proof of such a thing. You can't prove it, thus you are lying. That's the "real fake news". Your lies that you can't rebut. Try again.

Still waiting on the proof that Factcheck is a Liberal web-site. Or are you lying too?

 

[Vastator]

I wish it was more than this "partial" bullshit. Fuck our corrupt dishonest fed gov

Without a federal government, there is only anarchy. Is that what you want?

There are far worse alternatives. Unlike many people's misconception.... Anarchy isn't necessarily mass chaos, and violence. However it does require one to be free. Free thinking, and willing to do what it takes to ensure their own saftey, success, and freedom. But then some would prefer to be nannied, cradle to grave. Such people aren't capable of handling freedom.

Yep. Thats why the masses vote it away!

Right! And yet, the majority in this country vote for a Constitution that gives us those freedoms propped up by a federal government. We handle freedom because of a Constitution that has 27 delegated powers, giving us all the freedom we need. You throw that away, and you won't be able to spell freedom.

Wrong. Our freedoms are endowed to us "by our creator". The rest of the document goes on to limit the power of the government. The only thing the government props up is itself, and it's servile parasites...

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Boss, get a hold of yourself? American Citizen? lol! This from your link;
Given that illegals tend to earn less money and live in poverty, they are also prone to use welfare. In Texas, for instance, 58 percent of illegal households collect some form of welfare, CIS reported, with 49 percent using food assistance and 41 percent using Medicaid. In California and Illinois, 55 percent use welfare. The list of states goes down from there. Your article is six years old.

I already told you not to be a coward and try to dismiss the post by demonizing the source, which is Center for Immigration Studies, by the way. But I guess you can't read. Or have no other choice.

Do you think our problem with illegal immigrant parasites has really changed significantly in six years? If so please explain why anyone should buy that baloney.

The question is do tens of millions of undocumented immigrants take more out of our system than they can possibly put back in and the answer has always been yes! Of course they have. How could millions of uneducated low skilled, low wage workers possibly not suck of the teat of Uncle Scam and get by in America?

You strain credulity with your nonsensical bullshit!

 

[Polishprince]

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check?

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Do you have any idea how much of a fool you are making of yourself by linking Right wing opinion pieces? Not one sentence from that site documents anything from Factcheck.org that is categorically false with backup documentation, proving such a thing. The whole article is an opinion, based on nothing tangible for us to dissect. Lol! Why do you continue to make shit up,via Right-wing propaganda sites?

Conservatives don't fall for that shit. Really, Fact Check needs to prove their own assertions about our President.

Conservatives aren't going to get caught up in "proving" statements false. The idea is to move forward not get caught up in Fact Check's bullshit.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ Politico? LOL

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check? LOL

 

[BWK]

They are defending against military invasion not against people coming to mow your lawn

That's the idiot's answer. They are defending against a refugee tide, the same as we are doing at our Southern border.
the obstruction of the left notwithstanding.

Refugee tide's are not illegal border crossings. You know that right?

 

[rightwinger]

They are defending against military invasion not against people coming to mow your lawn

That's the idiot's answer. They are defending against a refugee tide, the same as we are doing at our Southern border.
the obstruction of the left notwithstanding.

That is a realist looking at the actual threat

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Still waiting on the proof that Factcheck is a Liberal web-site. Or are you lying too?

FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation
Fact Check is funded by the Annenberg Foundation a decidedly left leaning organization. Their impartiality is called into question as a result.

 

[BWK]

/——/ Politico? LOL

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check? LOL

Like I said, try as you might, you have nothing better to counter, so enjoy laughing, because you're only doing the "lol" on yourself.

 

[Polishprince]

They are defending against military invasion not against people coming to mow your lawn

That's the idiot's answer. They are defending against a refugee tide, the same as we are doing at our Southern border.
the obstruction of the left notwithstanding.

Refugee tide's are not illegal border crossings. You know that right?

Wrong, they are the same thing. When Illegals get caught, they say they are "refugees" so they can delay deportation for 2 years while waiting for a hearing. The two phenomena are connected.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Refugee tide's are not illegal border crossings. You know that right?

Do you have a point? Sixty five nations have put up walls to end the unwanted flow of refugees into their nation.

 

[BWK]

Still waiting on the proof that Factcheck is a Liberal web-site. Or are you lying too?

FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation
Fact Check is funded by the Annenberg Foundation a decidedly left leaning organization. Their impartiality is called into question as a result.

Questioned by who? You? Right-wing talk shows/radio? Who? And what are the who's credentials?
Established in 1996, Free Republic is one of the earliest and largest online gathering places for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!


By the way, you just posted a conservative web site. What is it with you people and your incessant posting of conservative websites? They're everywhere, and they pedal in lying.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yep! And you have nothing to counter their argument. No surprises there.

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check? LOL

Like I said, try as you might, you have nothing better to counter, so enjoy laughing, because you're only doing the "lol" on yourself.

/----/ Once again for you slow on the uptake libtards. It was my response to candycorn post #80 who responded to my link on the cost of illegals in the Washington Times. "Washington times? LOL" Got it? do I need to spell it put in crayons for you to grasp?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

That is a realist looking at the actual threat

It's a know nothing's assessment of the border security of sixty five nations and a very stupid assessment indeed considering my link, which I've provided several times, says specifically why the walls were constructed.

It's not for military purposes. Stop shooting your ignorant pie hole off.

 

[BWK]

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check?

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Do you have any idea how much of a fool you are making of yourself by linking Right wing opinion pieces? Not one sentence from that site documents anything from Factcheck.org that is categorically false with backup documentation, proving such a thing. The whole article is an opinion, based on nothing tangible for us to dissect. Lol! Why do you continue to make shit up,via Right-wing propaganda sites?

Conservatives don't fall for that shit. Really, Fact Check needs to prove their own assertions about our President.

Conservatives aren't going to get caught up in "proving" statements false. The idea is to move forward not get caught up in Fact Check's bullshit.

They aren't going to get caught up anyway, because they do not have access to raw data that is unbiased. You just picked the easy way out. Spoiler alert, I've known that for decades. It's why debating these Trump Sheep has been so easy. They never use real information. Just emotions and lies.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Questioned by who? You? Right-wing talk shows/radio? Who? And what are the who's credentials?
Established in 1996, Free Republic is one of the earliest and largest online gathering places for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!

Questioned by people who don't accept at face value what leftists tell them. That's who. The Annenberg Foundation funds Fact Check and Fact Check's credibility is decidedly damaged by whoppers like this: No Evidence Soros Is Funding Immigrant 'Caravan' - FactCheck.org

The many links between George Soros and the immigrant caravan have been established over and over again. Fact Check tries to pretend otherwise.

By the way, you just posted a conservative web site. What is it with you people and your incessant posting of conservative websites? They're everywhere, and they pedal in lying.

Yes. A conservative web site. So what? Should I go to Vox or Newsweek or Huffington Post to dig up facts the left would rather not acknowledge? The monolithic main stream media has made checking the lies of the left an impossible task
so right wing media fills that space.

 

[Papageorgio]

Our federal govt has a limited set of powers. They have been abusing the constitution since lincoln.
Fuck them.
We still have state and local govts. Also, we have people. THE people.

Link to the factual instances where the federal government has been abusing the Constitution?

We have the people? What people? Who are these people? I don't know them, do you? I don't know you. Do you think I'm going to trust you who I do not know to look after my well being? Lol! Not even on a bet.

An state and local governments? What about them? Without federal oversight of state and local governments, they are useless.

So you are going to trust the government?

A hell of a lot more than state and local governments. Have you ever lived in a small town? Man please. Those son of a bucks will rob you blind.

Can you answer the question? Do you trust the government?

You never answered my question. Why should I answer yours?

I asked you my question first, but I really don't care what your answer is, I already have it.

 

[rightwinger]

Oh, and kudos go out to Deanrd; Cost of Illegal Immigrants - FactCheck.org I'll tell him you said hello.

/---/ My source was not an email chain. Moron.

It doesn't have to be doofus. Fact check already debunked what you were posting anyway. And who is going to believe you anyway, after you tried to lie your way through another bogus link from the beginning? Washington Times? Lol! You have no skin in this game any longer. Take a hike.

/----/ Fact Check? LOL

Like I said, try as you might, you have nothing better to counter, so enjoy laughing, because you're only doing the "lol" on yourself.

/----/ Once again for you slow on the uptake libtards. It was my response to candycorn post #80 who responded to my link on the cost of illegals in the Washington Times. "Washington times? LOL" Got it? do I need to spell it put in crayons for you to grasp?
View attachment 238125

What moron reads the Washington Times?