CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

[daws101]

That's one way to look at it.
Reality might be another.

Hey idiot!

The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.

False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.
It's called limited shelf life.



Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

 

[EriktheRed]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.


Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server

Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Yup, she's guilty...you just know it, goddammit!

 

[PredFan]

Hey idiot!

The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.

False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.
It's called limited shelf life.



Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

 

[PredFan]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.


Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server

Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Yup, she's guilty...you just know it, goddammit!

As does anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

 

[bendog]

False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.
It's called limited shelf life.



Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

The FBI recovered the emails.

 

[daws101]

False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.
It's called limited shelf life.



Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

 

[PredFan]

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

The FBI recovered the emails.

Doesn't matter. It's still obstruction of justice. She tried, failing doesn't erase the crime.

 

[EriktheRed]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.


Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server

Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Yup, she's guilty...you just know it, goddammit!

As does anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

Nope, sorry. Your fantasies of what you imagine happened aren't proof.

 

[PredFan]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.


Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server

Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Yup, she's guilty...you just know it, goddammit!

As does anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

Nope, sorry. Your fantasies of what you imagine happened aren't proof.

Apparently you don't have two brain cells.

 

[EriktheRed]

Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.


Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server

Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Yup, she's guilty...you just know it, goddammit!

As does anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

Nope, sorry. Your fantasies of what you imagine happened aren't proof.

Apparently you don't have two brain cells.

Nope, I have many more...enough to know that you and other wingnuts don't have shit now and you didn't have it then.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Wikileaks just published a hilly email asking for classified info to be stripped of its heading and sent unsecure......oooooops

 

[EriktheRed]

Wikileaks just published a hilly email asking for classified info to be stripped of its heading and sent unsecure......oooooops

Well, then let's see if anyone besides Alex Jones has something to say about it.

 

[boedicca]

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”

In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.

In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]





However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:

Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.

“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.

On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.

Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”




Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.

It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.

Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:

Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.

How much THC have you consumed today?

 

[Siete]

Corrie is full of shit ... absolutely NO health or saftey issues ...

A picture of a pretty beach doesn't change the fact that Mexico is a crime infested Third World Shithole.

You ever been to Mexico?

False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.
It's called limited shelf life.



Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

I don't because I already knowledgable .........



bout whut Gomer?

 

[EriktheRed]

Corrie is full of shit ... absolutely NO health or saftey issues ...

A picture of a pretty beach doesn't change the fact that Mexico is a crime infested Third World Shithole.

You ever been to Mexico?

Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.

Didn't watch the clip did you .

Don't need to.

Of course you don't because knowledge is the enemy of wilful ignorance.

I don't because I already knowledgable. I am also correct. She destroyed evidence and nothing Rachel Madcow has to say will change that fact.

I don't because I already knowledgable .........



bout whut Gomer?

bout shit he can't prove, but he just knows anyway

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

This is just a flawed opinion from Newsweek.

You'll never find more left leaning bias than Newsweek, hardly a credible source.

I also find it very hard to believe that the entire time Hillary Clinton worked for the state department, that not one piece of classified information was ever brought to her attention through her "choice" in using a private server.

There would also be no need for the FBI to investigate, and those of the FBI involved in such inquiry would have released their own detailed report exonerating Mrs. Clinton of any wrong doing. The only "official" detailed report has come from the IG, an individual appointed by President Obama and approved with the help of democrats.

Let me know when the left can produce a serious news report backed by an "official" document, from a government agency specifically tasked with conducting a thorough investigation into Mrs Clinton's emails and use of a personal server.

 

[Dragonlady]

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Did you just make that up? Because she hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice, there's not been any trial, and no one, other than you, has pronounced her guilty.

Until there are evidence, witnesses, and charges, this is just another smear attempt by the right. A really good attempt, but one not based in facts, or evidence.

 

[Wry Catcher]

So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.

That's one way to look at it.
Reality might be another.

Hey idiot!

The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.

So prove it. What evidence was destroyed?


A LE Officer/Deputy in making an arrest and alleging a crime has been committed provides evidence as to the time, place and event, notes the reporting person(s) and witnesses; /s/He then signs the report under penalty of perjury; the same process is completed by the prosecutor who decides on the charges to be filed after his or her review of the arrest report. You and others can claim anything you please, but with no supporting evidence, and no threat to you, you can say anything you please - you do. Of course you have no evidence since you did not see her commit a crime, which makes you just an echo in the wind.

You have to be this stupid to be a lefty.

What is stupid in my post?

Q. Have arrest reports been written
Q. Has HRC been subpoenaed before a Grand Jury
Q. Has an indictment been issued
Q. Has she been arraigned
Q. Is predfan a stupid asshole?

A. No, No, No, No and YES!

 

[EriktheRed]

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Did you just make that up? Because she hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice, there's not been any trial, and no one, other than you, has pronounced her guilty.

Until there are evidence, witnesses, and charges, this is just another smear attempt by the right. A really good attempt, but one not based in facts, or evidence.

I would argue that is NOT a "really good attempt" if it's "not based in facts, or evidence".

 

[Dragonlady]

Point is, she is guilty of obstruction of justice. Just because they were able to thwart her efforts, doesn't mean she isn't guilty.

Did you just make that up? Because she hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice, there's not been any trial, and no one, other than you, has pronounced her guilty.

Until there are evidence, witnesses, and charges, this is just another smear attempt by the right. A really good attempt, but one not based in facts, or evidence.

I would argue that is NOT a "really good attempt" if it's "not based in facts, or evidence".

It's a really good attempt because it involves the Benghazi Committee, the FBI, the CIA and the mainstream media. The mainstream media is completely distracted from the real issues of the election, which are jobs, income equity, and reforming the tax code to stop off the wealth from flowing to the top. Wage subsidies to corporations have to end for the middle class to have a chance.

The media hasn't done their job well during this election. They focus on Drumpf's ridiculous bombast, and made up scandals promugated by the Republicans against Hillary. It's all about the ratings, the country be damned.

IMO the Republican Party doesn't deserve to survive this fiasco. They have little interest in what's best for the country and have elevated greed and avarice to being virtues. Their actions are power at any cost.