Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
It's called limited shelf life.
Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.
Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!So it looks like it's E. CUMMINGS word against the chairman of the committee. Since E. CUMMINGS was up to his eyeballs in the riots in Baltimore, I tend to discount anything that race-baiting asshole has to say.CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards
“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.
On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”
In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.
In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]
However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:
Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.
“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.
On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.
Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”
Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.
It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.
Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:
In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:
Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.
In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:
This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.
Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:
To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.
Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:
Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”
Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:
Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.
This isnt about E Cummings...From the article:
Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.
“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.
127 that was made available to them.
30,000 emails that she destroyed most likely told a different story.
But this only focuses on emails to one person. It is the tip of the iceberg, because Hillary had 66,000 emails, half of which she refused to turn over....claiming they were personal in nature. Personal, meaning damaging or embarrassing.
Reminds me of white water.That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
It's called limited shelf life.
Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.
Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.
Didn't watch the clip did you .
Republicans will be Republicans. Remember their motto- "Party before Country"CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards
“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.
On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”
In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.
In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]
However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:
Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.
“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.
On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.
Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”
Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.
It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.
Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:
In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:
Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.
In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:
This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.
Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:
To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.
Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:
Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”
Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.
Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:
Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.
False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
It's called limited shelf life.
Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.
Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.
If they were destroyed how could you know there was evidence in them. Very much like when under President Bush and the CIA destroyed the videos of them torturing of prisoners. Who got charged it that case?
How many times will the RWNJ's cry wolf?
False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.That's one way to look at it.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
It's called limited shelf life.
Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.
Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.
If they were destroyed how could you know there was evidence in them. Very much like when under President Bush and the CIA destroyed the videos of them torturing of prisoners. Who got charged it that case?
How many times will the RWNJ's cry wolf?
You don't seem to understand how that works. In a case involving e-mails, destroying e-mails is destroying evidence.
Right. And the fact that they were deleting proves they were personal. You've been hypnotized. They uncovered classified documents, duh!It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?
She didn't delete "most of them". She deleted 30,000 "personal" emails. She turned over 60,000 emails to State. So no, she did not delete most of them.
That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
Right. And the fact that they were deleting proves they were personal. You've been hypnotized. They uncovered classified documents, duh!
Right. And the fact that they were deleting proves they were personal. You've been hypnotized. They uncovered classified documents, duh!She didn't delete "most of them". She deleted 30,000 "personal" emails. She turned over 60,000 emails to State. So no, she did not delete most of them.
Wrong. They took the classified heading off and sent it out. That doesn't declassify jack shit. That's a left wing cover up lie that only works on the hypnotized followers. So you too think she believed no classified mail would show up? Why? Because she thought they didn't trust her with it?The "classifed" documents were classified after the fact.
Did the classified documents go to anyone other than the intended receiver? - No
Was her server ever hacked? - No
Have you no comment on Trey Gowdy manufacturing evidence against Hillary? That is far more serious than anything Hillary did.
False the reality is that all emails get tossed in a box in no particular order and are stored for a time and then distroyed so more files can be added.Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
It's called limited shelf life.
Hillary would not know what files were distroyed or when they were.
Bull shit. She destroyed evidence, she even admitted it when she told the committee that the e-mails she destroyed were personal and she didn't want them aired. We have only her word on that. Clearly, she destroyed evidence.
If they were destroyed how could you know there was evidence in them. Very much like when under President Bush and the CIA destroyed the videos of them torturing of prisoners. Who got charged it that case?
How many times will the RWNJ's cry wolf?
You don't seem to understand how that works. In a case involving e-mails, destroying e-mails is destroying evidence.
Did she take the hard drive out and smash it to pieces?
That's one way to look at it.So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.
Reality might be another.
Hey idiot!
The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.
So prove it. What evidence was destroyed?
A LE Officer/Deputy in making an arrest and alleging a crime has been committed provides evidence as to the time, place and event, notes the reporting person(s) and witnesses; /s/He then signs the report under penalty of perjury; the same process is completed by the prosecutor who decides on the charges to be filed after his or her review of the arrest report. You and others can claim anything you please, but with no supporting evidence, and no threat to you, you can say anything you please - you do. Of course you have no evidence since you did not see her commit a crime, which makes you just an echo in the wind.
Right. And the fact that they were deleting proves they were personal. You've been hypnotized. They uncovered classified documents, duh!She didn't delete "most of them". She deleted 30,000 "personal" emails. She turned over 60,000 emails to State. So no, she did not delete most of them.
Wrong. They took the classified heading off and sent it out. That doesn't declassify jack shit. That's a left wing cover up lie that only works on the hypnotized followers. So you too think she believed no classified mail would show up? Why? Because she thought they didn't trust her with it?The "classifed" documents were classified after the fact.
Did the classified documents go to anyone other than the intended receiver? - No
Was her server ever hacked? - No
Have you no comment on Trey Gowdy manufacturing evidence against Hillary? That is far more serious than anything Hillary did.
Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com
Right. And the fact that they were deleting proves they were personal. You've been hypnotized. They uncovered classified documents, duh!She didn't delete "most of them". She deleted 30,000 "personal" emails. She turned over 60,000 emails to State. So no, she did not delete most of them.
Wrong. They took the classified heading off and sent it out. That doesn't declassify jack shit. That's a left wing cover up lie that only works on the hypnotized followers. So you too think she believed no classified mail would show up? Why? Because she thought they didn't trust her with it?The "classifed" documents were classified after the fact.
Did the classified documents go to anyone other than the intended receiver? - No
Was her server ever hacked? - No
Have you no comment on Trey Gowdy manufacturing evidence against Hillary? That is far more serious than anything Hillary did.
Apparently you didn't read the article that was linked. The CIA says that never happened. Clinton categorically did not do that. The CIA says Trey Gowdy, or someone on his staff, falsified that evidence.
The whole email scandal is basically made up. She made mistakes but at the end of the day, no government secrets were compromised.
you are aware you're trying to teach worms to walk on their knees aren't you ? Rightwingers could care less about anything except the crap they make up.
Never use Trey Gowdy as a source. LOL And esp don't use him for a source and call somebody else stupid.Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com
Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server
Not that Hillary isn't a dishonest person, she is. But emails are merely a distraction you've latched onto, just as Trey Gowdy has. It's the HRC version of birther.
