JoeB131
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 172,508
- 33,201
The reason the banks issued these mortgages is that they figured it was a no-lose deal.
No they didn't. At least most of them didn't.
If they foreclosed on Johnny Foodstamp, the house was worth more than the mortgage, and they'd more than get their money back by reselling it.
Banks don't like foreclosing on properties because they are in the lending business, not the real estate management and brokerage business.
Then they took that mortgage and sold it as an "investment", overstating its value.
This is totally wrong because it is physically impossible. If the bank forecloses on a property, the mortgage no longer exists so it can't be sold.
That was the criminal part of what was done.
lol
If you live in Fairy-Tale Land, maybe.
It certainly would be a crime if a bank sold a mortgage that no longer existed on a home it foreclosed. But since you're making shit up, it's not a crime banks actually committed.
I mean, unless you can prove me wrong by backing up your statement with a link. But I'm not holding my breath.
That isn't what I said. It was well known that the banks were selling toxic mortgages as investments...
Knowing these folks were going to be forclosed on because they never should have gotten a loan to start with.
Again, we need to take the banksters and throw them in big boy prison with the rest of the crooks and a jar of vasoline. Then film the results and show them on Orientation Day for new bankers.
That will get the point across.