Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is so absolutely asinine about this thread is the OP thinks they have more right to exist in this country and those that disagree with their personal ideology should leave.
Then on the next breath the makes statements about individuality.
How collectively idiotic when you make both statements and they try to prove their point by making both statements.
And where's the better model? That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all, and as a consequence has a better socio-economic condition than we do?
"...That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all,...."
It requires a certain kind of fool to suggest that Liberal policies have helped the poor.
What was the percentage in poverty when LBJ began the "war on poverty"?
What is the percentage in poverty today?
You don't work. Someone else puts a roof over your head and pays your keep. Would you be better off without that?
Would that get you out of the hammock and out looking for work? Are you made lazy by the safety net you're provided?
Wrong. Conservatives believe in smaller government, less central control, freedom in the marketplace and an armed population to overthrow tyranny. You are 180 degrees out of phase with reality.The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
"...That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all,...."
It requires a certain kind of fool to suggest that Liberal policies have helped the poor.
What was the percentage in poverty when LBJ began the "war on poverty"?
What is the percentage in poverty today?
I said name the country. What country has ever made itself better by doing nothing for the Poor?
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
"...That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all,...."
It requires a certain kind of fool to suggest that Liberal policies have helped the poor.
What was the percentage in poverty when LBJ began the "war on poverty"?
What is the percentage in poverty today?
You don't work. Someone else puts a roof over your head and pays your keep. Would you be better off without that?
Would that get you out of the hammock and out looking for work? Are you made lazy by the safety net you're provided?
First....it's none of your business what I do.
Disgusting, low-life, slime like you will do anything, say anything, to change the subject.
"...That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all,...."
It requires a certain kind of fool to suggest that Liberal policies have helped the poor.
What was the percentage in poverty when LBJ began the "war on poverty"?
What is the percentage in poverty today?
You don't work. Someone else puts a roof over your head and pays your keep. Would you be better off without that?
Would that get you out of the hammock and out looking for work? Are you made lazy by the safety net you're provided?
First....it's none of your business what I do.
Disgusting, low-life, slime like you will do anything, say anything, to change the subject.
Wrong. Conservatives believe in smaller government, less central control, freedom in the marketplace and an armed population to overthrow tyranny. You are 180 degrees out of phase with reality.The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
So Liberalism in the 18th century England is best exemplified by a loyalty to the absolute rule of the King?
lol, next you'll be telling us that the Liberalism of czarist Russia was best exemplified by a loyalty to the absolute power of the Csar,
and that conservatives like Lenin carried out the Russian Revolution.
"...That is, a country that doesn't help its poor people at all,...."
It requires a certain kind of fool to suggest that Liberal policies have helped the poor.
What was the percentage in poverty when LBJ began the "war on poverty"?
What is the percentage in poverty today?
I said name the country. What country has ever made itself better by doing nothing for the Poor?
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
I said name the country. What country has ever made itself better by doing nothing for the Poor?
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
I've already won that argument dozens of times.
Now you tell us, how many poor people would be better off if we took away their Medicaid, their public schooling, their food stamps, and any housing assistance they get?
How many would magically rise out of poverty?
Because that's YOUR solution. Explain to us, in detail, how YOUR solution works better...
...and to go back to my original point, name the countries where that works.
Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.Conservatives founded the US?!?! LOL...Now I've heard everything.
Ignore the very definition of conservative! Instead listen to the chopped up musings of someone with sentence or paragraph dyslexia. If she talks enough it will become true. Stupid Websters with their "definitions" smh
George Washington was the wealthiest President we've ever had.
The Revolutionary leaders were almost exclusively wealthy, educated men.
Most were landowners. Most were married. Most were successful.
They were Conservatives.
Now the French? The French Revolution?
They were scum -- Like you.
The French Revolution is where you get your ideas from. But you're not bright enough to know that and you're too lazy to study it and figure it out.
The French Revolution was the libturd Revolution. The American Revolution was the Conservative Revolution.
Republicans follow the lead of Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton.
The scum of the Earth -- You. Follow the lead of Robespierre.
Just a fact.
The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
I said name the country. What country has ever made itself better by doing nothing for the Poor?
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
I've already won that argument dozens of times.
Now you tell us, how many poor people would be better off if we took away their Medicaid, their public schooling, their food stamps, and any housing assistance they get?
How many would magically rise out of poverty?
Because that's YOUR solution. Explain to us, in detail, how YOUR solution works better...
...and to go back to my original point, name the countries where that works.
Allying with the Federalists, George Washington was not averse to some semblance of the British monarchy in America's new government, particularly in the executive branch.The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
Was Stalin a Conservative?
How about Hitler? A Conservative?
Is Castro a Conservative or a liberal scumbag like you?
How about Kim Jong Un? How about Mao?
What is a Conservative?
You're a lying scumbag that only sees things the way he wants to see them.
All you understand is if you agree with it, it's good and if you don't, it's bad.
You're a self-deluding piece of shit.
In 18th Century terms, George Washington might have been a liberal. In today's terms, he was certainly a Conservative.
This idiot just denied that the founding fathers were liberal on another page while calling everyone stupid. Then he admits they were on a new page and still think everyone else is the dummy
In short, they were radical Whigs. The Whigs reemerged in the 1850s to ally with the abolitionists and establish the modern Republican Party, the party that would eventually attract conservatives.The Founding Fathers were Liberals?
I don't think so.
I'm quite ready to believe that the Founding Fathers were Radicals.
Some of them Liberal Radicals.
Some of them Conservative Radicals.
Some of them Egalitarian and even Abolitionist in nature.
Some of them Wealthy and well-Propertied and some even Slaveholders to boot.
All of them being forced to morph into the first Americans by the events of the times.
They found a Middle Ground, in fostering Egalitarianism - amongst White Folk, anyway.
It fell to another generation to pay the ultimate price for that Founding Compromise between Liberal and Conservative positions of the Founding Times.
Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.George Washington was the wealthiest President we've ever had.
The Revolutionary leaders were almost exclusively wealthy, educated men.
Most were landowners. Most were married. Most were successful.
They were Conservatives.
Now the French? The French Revolution?
They were scum -- Like you.
The French Revolution is where you get your ideas from. But you're not bright enough to know that and you're too lazy to study it and figure it out.
The French Revolution was the libturd Revolution. The American Revolution was the Conservative Revolution.
Republicans follow the lead of Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton.
The scum of the Earth -- You. Follow the lead of Robespierre.
Just a fact.
The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.George Washington was the wealthiest President we've ever had.
The Revolutionary leaders were almost exclusively wealthy, educated men.
Most were landowners. Most were married. Most were successful.
They were Conservatives.
Now the French? The French Revolution?
They were scum -- Like you.
The French Revolution is where you get your ideas from. But you're not bright enough to know that and you're too lazy to study it and figure it out.
The French Revolution was the libturd Revolution. The American Revolution was the Conservative Revolution.
Republicans follow the lead of Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton.
The scum of the Earth -- You. Follow the lead of Robespierre.
Just a fact.
The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
I've already won that argument dozens of times.
Now you tell us, how many poor people would be better off if we took away their Medicaid, their public schooling, their food stamps, and any housing assistance they get?
How many would magically rise out of poverty?
Because that's YOUR solution. Explain to us, in detail, how YOUR solution works better...
...and to go back to my original point, name the countries where that works.
Lying as usual, huh fuckwad?
Where did any of us, including PC, ever state that we wanted to ELIMINATE those programs?
You're just a lying fuck. You really and honestly are.
scumbag
Okay, you've cracked our code. When we call for a return to constitutional government, that is exactly what we mean.Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
Conservatives today want the government to get out of the way so the Corporations and the Christian churches can run the country.
I asked you for the two percentages.
We both know why you wouldn't provide them.
I've already won that argument dozens of times.
Now you tell us, how many poor people would be better off if we took away their Medicaid, their public schooling, their food stamps, and any housing assistance they get?
How many would magically rise out of poverty?
Because that's YOUR solution. Explain to us, in detail, how YOUR solution works better...
...and to go back to my original point, name the countries where that works.
"I've already won that argument dozens of times."
Really?
What argument would that be?
And why are you so afraid of providing the two percentages?
Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.The Loyalists, also called the Tories, were the Conservatives in America at the time of the revolution.
Conservatives today want the government to get out of the way so the Corporations and the Christian churches can run the country.
Okay, you've cracked our code. When we call for a return to constitutional government, that is exactly what we mean.Tories emigrated before and during the war; they're allegiance was to the state (conservative idea, right?). The patriots, on the other hand - the founders and, indeed, most Americans at the time - espoused the individualism and natural law principles that conservatives today espouse.
Conservatives today want the government to get out of the way so the Corporations and the Christian churches can run the country.
Your mom was right; you're a genius.
