AlexanderPK
Gold Member
- May 23, 2017
- 1,997
- 580
He has been reasonable since 2007. It didn't help.If Putin were a reasonable man he would not have invaded in the first place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has been reasonable since 2007. It didn't help.If Putin were a reasonable man he would not have invaded in the first place.
If Putin were a reasonable man he would not have invaded in the first place.
You seek a win for Russia.
So, you use that to justify Putin's desire to make Ukraine, Russia again?
His goal of bringing Ukraine back under Russian domination was not reasonable and a non-starter.He has been reasonable since 2007. It didn't help.
Who is that? Xi Jinping?just another voice for the enemy of the free world.
If you mean Russia, quit kidding yourself. There is NO CHANCE of Russia not beating Ukraine unless NATO gets directly involved and goes to war itself.You will lose.
Traitor to whom? ...![]()
I'm not for sending our money and soldiers half-way around the world to defend other countries borders and fight for their freedom.How do you feel about authorities taking over free countries? What about the right of the free to remain free, especially if willing to die for the right to be free and the hope of passing on that freedom to their kids, grandkids and beyond.
He was explaining his reasoning, as justification for his position. Can't you freeking READ?WHERE was anything JUSTIFIED? Can't you freeking READ?
Putin is a reasonable man and will allow Ukraine to surrender peaceably.
No.He was explaining his reasoning, as justification for his position. Can't you freeking READ?
The yes-starter was the 2014 coup that brought Ukraine under the US domination, wasn't it?His goal of bringing Ukraine back under Russian domination was not reasonable and a non-starter.
I dont support either side,, but putin is the aggressor and should surrender now,,
Our soldiers are not in Ukraine. We have long term commitments to NATO, no matter what you are against.I'm not for sending our money and soldiers half-way around the world to defend other countries borders and fight for their freedom.
When we aren't defending our own southern border, and our freedom's are slowly being legislated away by leftist liberals and globalists in the government.
since putin is the aggressor its him that should surrender,,
Pretty sure I got yer answer right here , TRAITOR
You seek a win for Russia. Your desires are known.
Millions have already fled.Insurgents? No, these are the people of Ukraine defending their home against unlawful invaders.
It will end with Zelensky's agreement to the new treaty terms or Ukraine's utter annihilation.It will end when Russia/Putin withdraws.
At least you admit it, so that is something.