Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am aware of a number of lowlifes who ARE MARRIED that got pregnant and as soon as they found out, he moved out so that she could get welfare, WIC and the pregnancy would be paid for. As soon as the child was born--he moved back in.Only if their parents are truly unable to support them. But for a woman who moves in with her boyfriend, a man who is working full time with a good salary, and then she gets pregnant, she doesn’t get food stamps for the baby simply because she won’t marry him (and thus give up the food stamps).
We just hand out free stuff for people who choose to have other people support their kids, when they themselves are capable of doing so. That needs to stop.
Is that is what is in Project 2025?
I do not disagree.Only if their parents are truly unable to support them. But for a woman who moves in with her boyfriend, a man who is working full time with a good salary, and then she gets pregnant, she doesn’t get food stamps for the baby simply because she won’t marry him (and thus give up the food stamps).
We just hand out free stuff for people who choose to have other people support their kids, when they themselves are capable of doing so. That needs to stop.
Would you take that away from the kids who truly need it?Where have you been? Children have had those things available for fifty years. Healthcare, housing and food are provided by the state (your commie utopia) for at least fifty years if their parents are unwilling or unable to provide it. Try again and either educate yourself or quit lying on your next post.
If you've been following, you already know the answer to that. I think Lisa and I have been very clear. You even came off of your disingenuous line and AGREED with her in post #183. Are you trolling?Would you take that away from the kids who truly need it?
I caught that! I was so surprised I did a double-take. She slipped up and let it out that she thinks people who are able to support their kids SHOULD.If you've been following, you already know the answer to that. I think Lisa and I have been very clear. You even came off of your disingenuous line and AGREED with her in post #183. Are you trolling?
I misunderstood your post, I thought your term "commie utopia" was an insult, not something you supported.If you've been following, you already know the answer to that. I think Lisa and I have been very clear. You even came off of your disingenuous line and AGREED with her in post #183. Are you trolling?
Again, reread Lisa's post that you agreed with. That is what I agree with as well (Is that clear enough for you to understand?) What you advocate for is the status quo which is a commie utopia. Care to double down again and troll some more?I misunderstood your post, I thought your term "commie utopia" was an insult, not something you supported.
No slip up at all since I do, but the bottom line is that kids, certainly if they are US citizens, deserve a decent place to live, decent food, a decent education, and decent healthcare. We provided all that to our kids but not every kid is so lucky. The bottom line is that I'd prefer to have people abuse the system, and there will always be some, rather than have the system abuse the kids.I caught that! I was so surprised I did a double-take. She slipped up and let it out that she thinks people who are able to support their kids SHOULD.
Deal! Can you send to me via Venmo?I'll tell you what: I'll give you $100 for the wrongs I did to you, and you give me $100 for the wrongs you did to me, and we will call it even.
It is your post that confuses me. You wrote "Healthcare, housing and food are provided by the state (your commie utopia) for at least fifty years if their parents are unwilling or unable to provide it". Since we all seem to agree this is a good thing you must approve of our "commie utopia" and that confused me.Again, reread Lisa's post that you agreed with. That is what I agree with as well (Is that clear enough for you to understand?) What you advocate for is the status quo which is a commie utopia. Care to double down again and troll some more?
Biologically or is that what you "identify" as?(FYI, 'she' is a he.)
Typical democrat. Read what I say and not what you want it to say, moron. Parsing a thread to agree with you is the same as lying.It is your post that confuses me. You wrote "Healthcare, housing and food are provided by the state (your commie utopia) for at least fifty years if their parents are unwilling or unable to provide it". Since we all seem to agree this is a good thing you must approve of our "commie utopia" and that confused me.
Both, I'm very boring.Biologically or is that what you "identify" as?
Perhaps you can ask a person near you to read my post twice.My question was why do you support the biggest liar of them all?
No, but that was the case forever up until very recently.Good housing, education and healthcare IS available to EVERY American. Your disingenuous claim leaves one important word out that you really promote---FREE. You think these things should be free and that isn't how capitalism works. Get off your lazy ass and support yourself as millions of Americans before you have.
