Trajan
conscientia mille testes
thanks for trying to read the OP.
you did not get it, however, but found a way to point your fingers at obamacare.
hey your article framed the issue, I got it exactly, it was a politically risky move- risk vs. reward on a political scale. I used an example exactly in context. I am sorry if that's inconvenient.
you reframed the issue.
the issue has not been changed nor reframed, your own article makes the case; the CRUX OF THE MATTER..is POLITICS, the cost etc.
You are familiar with the definition of the word term Crux?
it appears you simply don't like being given an example that exposes your op for the self serving agitprop it is.
if you think I reframed the 'issue', really, then I must question your ability to comprehend the written word and parse simple analogy.