- Jul 28, 2015
- 21,416
- 32,456
COrrect, I will not be litigating the truth of scientific theories with know-nothing hacks on message boards. If you wanted to debate the science, you would be publishing science and speaking at universities and scientific society conventions. You would get laughed out of any of those venues in a matter of minutes. Unless, of course, you decided to really "show your ass" and call them all "liars"... then you would be insulted out of those venues."It's a cycle dumbass.""What MAN puts up yearly into the atmosphere is only 5% of what NATURE puts up there. "What MAN puts up yearly into the atmosphere is only 5% of what NATURE puts up there. And nature SINKS about 1/2 of that. And 1/2 of what's charged to MAN is just phony accounting anyways.
The yearly NATURAL VARIATION of carbon cycling is bigger than man's contribution.
So looking for say 2% of the SOURCE side of the carbon cycle is a pretty damn small number compared to our ability to measure the SINK side of the cycle. I'd say this experiment is "poorly documented"..
So what? Terrible denier talking point, laughed at by scientists. What matters is what adding carbon to the carbon cycle does to the climate. And nature can't keep up (as in, "re-fix" it) with the speed at which we are adding it, meaning we will create a driver which warms the climate and acidifies the oceans. These are settled facts. Those numbers are only "small" if you don't know what you are talking about, and you certainly do not.
It's a cycle dumbass. Nature doesn't PREFER to increase the CO2 in the atmos with just MAN's contributions. And we know that temperature drives CO2 as well as vici versi. There are NATURAL yearly emissions of CO2 that are virtually indistinguishable from Man's contributions. So it's NOT as documented and proven as your Clift Notes version that you picked up from your political journals.
Yet, the scientists that taught you and everyone else about those cycles .... the very scientists who discovered them, described them, named then, delineated them, dedicated their entire lives to learning about them ... they are sounding the alarms about climate change. your implication that they are all somehow ignorant of their own discoveries is bizarre, and you should be laughed out of any serious company. Unless you are explicitly calling them all liars, in which case you should just be insulted out of any serious company.
Still have yet to see you actually discuss any of the science. Seems you prefer to throw shit balls..
Why? Because your major was in creative writing?
*****CHUCKLE*****
Last edited: