Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But not one of you ignoramouses can refute any of the scientific evidence demonstrating the effects we have already felt from the warming.
Here is what you are saying. 95% to 97% of all the scientists in the world are in on a conspriracy. Scientists from all the nations and differant political systems in the world. But none of you can even give a coherant reason for such a conspiracy. Or how such a massive conspriracy involving millions of scientists would be organized. Millions of scientist in all the differant disciplines of science. You guys really need to stock up on aluminum foil for your little tin hats.
Well,, for such overwhelming confidence the evidence is pretty lack luster.
And they have a frikken NERVE to call people who don't bow to them, IGNORANT
they make me sick
and Matt has no problems with that one...he making me sick too
he hates us and our country
Ignorant, and willfully so. Mean of spirit and small of soul. You people only bow down to Mammon.
The evidence is overwhelming that we have changed the climate. And that the change will negatively impact all of us. The science is settled. Actually was settled a long time ago, but the denialists continue to lie about what science has said and even what science is.
And yet while this mantra is consistent, the only other constant is the LACK of any evidence to support the claim.
There has always been "climate change". The Earth wasn't static until 20 years ago when you morons dreamed up this CO2 trace-gas boogeyman that you can not predict, can not reasonably prove and yet continue to claim as real.
I've known children that claim the boogeyman is in their closet, too. Then when you open the closet and there is no boogeyman, suddenly Im told he's under the bed, then when checked, back in the closet....round and round we go.
Well,, for such overwhelming confidence the evidence is pretty lack luster.
I haven't seen anything that rises to the level of "evidence". What they have is coincidence that they call evidence.
But not one of you ignoramouses can refute any of the scientific evidence demonstrating the effects we have already felt from the warming.
Here is what you are saying. 95% to 97% of all the scientists in the world are in on a conspriracy. Scientists from all the nations and differant political systems in the world. But none of you can even give a coherant reason for such a conspiracy. Or how such a massive conspriracy involving millions of scientists would be organized. Millions of scientist in all the differant disciplines of science. You guys really need to stock up on aluminum foil for your little tin hats.
Your peddling a generator as your tapping away at your PC? Sell your car yet? eat raw food?
What are you doing to make a change,other than pointing fingers and calling names?
But not one of you ignoramouses can refute any of the scientific evidence demonstrating the effects we have already felt from the warming.
is what you are saying. 95% to 97% of all the scientists in the world are in on a conspriracy..
Ignorant, and willfully so. Mean of spirit and small of soul. You people only bow down to Mammon.
The evidence is overwhelming that we have changed the climate. And that the change will negatively impact all of us. The science is settled. Actually was settled a long time ago, but the denialists continue to lie about what science has said and even what science is.
And yet while this mantra is consistent, the only other constant is the LACK of any evidence to support the claim.
There has always been "climate change". The Earth wasn't static until 20 years ago when you morons dreamed up this CO2 trace-gas boogeyman that you can not predict, can not reasonably prove and yet continue to claim as real.
I've known children that claim the boogeyman is in their closet, too. Then when you open the closet and there is no boogeyman, suddenly Im told he's under the bed, then when checked, back in the closet....round and round we go.
So you want to prove the depths of your ignorance. The science is a bit more than 20 years old, you senile old fart. Joseph Fourier first noted that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat in the 1820's. John Tyndall first measured the absorption of heat by various atmospheric gases in 1859. And Arrhenius of Sweden first quantified the affects in 1896.
The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
Before flapping your silly yap and proving what an ignorant fool you truly are, perhaps a little research would be in order.
Well,, for such overwhelming confidence the evidence is pretty lack luster.
I haven't seen anything that rises to the level of "evidence". What they have is coincidence that they call evidence.
Of course you have not. You avoid reading real science like a plague. Instead you simply regurgitate whatever the "Conservative" political machine puts out there, no matter how ridiculous.
But not one of you ignoramouses can refute any of the scientific evidence demonstrating the effects we have already felt from the warming.
Here is what you are saying. 95% to 97% of all the scientists in the world are in on a conspriracy. Scientists from all the nations and differant political systems in the world. But none of you can even give a coherant reason for such a conspiracy. Or how such a massive conspriracy involving millions of scientists would be organized. Millions of scientist in all the differant disciplines of science. You guys really need to stock up on aluminum foil for your little tin hats.
Your peddling a generator as your tapping away at your PC? Sell your car yet? eat raw food?
What are you doing to make a change,other than pointing fingers and calling names?
Well, for one thing, pointing out what is real science and refuting the lies concerning what is happening. As more of the affects become evident in the lives of all, there are going to have to be changes made in the way we produce power. And people like me, that have actually read the science, will be voting for people that will do the neccessary things to make those changes happen. And people like you, that avoid facing reality no matter how bad that reality is biting you, will go on flapping yap, and denying what is right in front of you.
Golly, somebody discovered that the Earth is a greenhouse. Who knew?So you want to prove the depths of your ignorance. The science is a bit more than 20 years old, you senile old fart. Joseph Fourier first noted that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat in the 1820's. John Tyndall first measured the absorption of heat by various atmospheric gases in 1859. And Arrhenius of Sweden first quantified the affects in 1896.
The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
Before flapping your silly yap and proving what an ignorant fool you truly are, perhaps a little research would be in order.
Climate impacts 'overwhelming' - UN
BBC News - Climate impacts 'overwhelming' - UN
The impacts of global warming are likely to be "severe, pervasive and irreversible", a major report by the UN has warned.
Scientists and officials meeting in Japan say the document is the most comprehensive assessment to date of the impacts of climate change on the world.
Members of the UN's climate panel say it provides overwhelming evidence of the scale of these effects.
Natural systems now bear the brunt, but a growing impact on humans is feared.
Our health, homes, food and safety are all likely to be threatened by rising temperatures, the summary says.
The report was agreed after almost a week of intense discussions here in Yokohama.
This is the second of a series from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due out this year that outlines the causes, effects and solutions to global warming.
This latest Summary for Policymakers document highlights the fact that the amount of scientific evidence on the impacts of warming has almost doubled since the last report in 2007.
Be it the melting of glaciers or warming of permafrost, the summary highlights the fact that on all continents and across the oceans, changes in the climate have caused impacts on natural and human systems in recent decades.
In the words of the report, "increasing magnitudes of warming increase the likelihood of severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts".
"Nobody on this planet is going to be untouched by the impacts of climate change,'' IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri told journalists at a news conference in Yokohama.
Dr Saleemul Huq, a convening lead author on one of the chapters, commented: "Before this we thought we knew this was happening, but now we have overwhelming evidence that it is happening and it is real."
Michel Jarraud, secretary-general of the World Meteorological Organization, said that, previously, people could have damaged the Earth's climate out of "ignorance".
"Now, ignorance is no longer a good excuse," he said.
Mr Jarraud said the report was based on more than 12,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies. He said this document was "the most solid evidence you can get in any scientific discipline".
The report details significant short-term impacts on natural systems in the next 20 to 30 years. It details five reasons for concern that would likely increase as a result of the warming the world is already committed to.
These include threats to unique systems such as Arctic sea ice and coral reefs, where risks are said to increase to "very high" with a 2C rise in temperatures.
The summary document outlines impacts on the seas and on freshwater systems as well. The oceans will become more acidic, threatening coral and the many species that they harbour.
On land, animals, plants and other species will begin to move towards higher ground or towards the poles as the mercury rises.
Humans, though, are also increasingly affected as the century goes on.
Silly arguement on several fronts. First, the one concerning tectonics is plain wrong. Wegenor's Continental Drift was discussed in a geology text I read in the early '50's. And it was pointed out in the text, while there was strong evidence for the connection of South America and Africa, there was no known mechanism that would cause the continents to drift. Land bridges were the favored explanation of the time, because we could see one such between South America and North America. And one that existed when the contintental glaciers existed, between Asia and North America. It was not until we had the seismic maps of the subduction zones and the magnetic maps of the rift zones that the answer as to what the mechanism for drift was became clear.
this, like your other examples, was a territorial debate within one discipline. Global warming has affects that cut across almost every scientific discipline. Chemistry, Physics, Geology, Biology, the whole of science and scientists of every kind are publishing articles daily about what they are seeing as the result of the warming. The consensus for global warming is equal to that of the consensus for evolution. And the same type of person that denies evolution is denying that we are creating the warming.
"The consensus" has been wrong many times in the past. The same type that claims that consenus is science misuses science. The consensus once said the universe was in a steady state and ridiculed an alternative theory jokingly calling it "The Big Bang".The consensus for global warming is equal to that of the consensus for evolution. And the same type of person that denies evolution is denying that we are creating the warming.
