Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has already been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the government was lying. Wikileaks fucked them in the ass.More fine reading for those who need to discuss this :
While scientists are cautious, deniers throw caution to the wind
While the scientists themselves are suitably cautious (as seen in the paper's title), Anthony Watts is not. He seems keen to tempt NOAA into suing him for defamation. This time Anthony doesn't accuse the NOAA of fraud, he accuses it of lying, writing it is "the most mendacious attempt yet":
Tune in here tomorrow at 2PM EDT (11AM PDT) and you’ll see why this is the most mendacious attempt yet to save their climate science from the terrible ravages of an uncooperative planet.
Anthony, who can't get his head around anomalies from a baseline, claims that "WUWT has already found the fatal weakness in the paper". Notice that he stops short of claiming that it was he, Anthony, who found a fatal weakness. He probably didn't understand the paper, if he managed to read it. From the comments Anthony passed the buck to Perennially Puzzled Bob Tisdale. So you can expect a tedious, verbose, and dense article with lots of irrelevant charts of sea surface temperature in various oceans, mixed up with El Niño, sunlight-fueled water, complaints that climate models aren't weather forecasts, and greenhouse effect denial.
I'll be writing a separate article (probably two) on the "frenzy of denial" about the paper. This one is about the paper itself.
HotWhopper NOAA No pause in the global surface temperature
It has already been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the government was lying. Wikileaks fucked them in the ass.More fine reading for those who need to discuss this :
While scientists are cautious, deniers throw caution to the wind
While the scientists themselves are suitably cautious (as seen in the paper's title), Anthony Watts is not. He seems keen to tempt NOAA into suing him for defamation. This time Anthony doesn't accuse the NOAA of fraud, he accuses it of lying, writing it is "the most mendacious attempt yet":
Tune in here tomorrow at 2PM EDT (11AM PDT) and you’ll see why this is the most mendacious attempt yet to save their climate science from the terrible ravages of an uncooperative planet.
Anthony, who can't get his head around anomalies from a baseline, claims that "WUWT has already found the fatal weakness in the paper". Notice that he stops short of claiming that it was he, Anthony, who found a fatal weakness. He probably didn't understand the paper, if he managed to read it. From the comments Anthony passed the buck to Perennially Puzzled Bob Tisdale. So you can expect a tedious, verbose, and dense article with lots of irrelevant charts of sea surface temperature in various oceans, mixed up with El Niño, sunlight-fueled water, complaints that climate models aren't weather forecasts, and greenhouse effect denial.
I'll be writing a separate article (probably two) on the "frenzy of denial" about the paper. This one is about the paper itself.
HotWhopper NOAA No pause in the global surface temperature
If you cannot accept that fact then you are nothing but a brainwashed SADFI.
So fuck off Chicken Little. Global Warming doomsday cultists are weak-minded, unintelligent nitwits who do not have the capability to think logically.
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Based on your knowledge of statistics, how much would it have to have changed to be statistically significant?
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Based on your knowledge of statistics, how much would it have to have changed to be statistically significant?
Even if you could get anyone to swallow this load of Bull Shit, how you reckon you gonna cool an ocean off??
What else you gonna do and what did you say we had to do with this??
Are we saying now the atmosphere is letting more heat in, that would clash with verifiable data that has not been skewed, now what??
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Based on your knowledge of statistics, how much would it have to have changed to be statistically significant?
What happened to that teaching moment you promised me?
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Based on your knowledge of statistics, how much would it have to have changed to be statistically significant?
What happened to that teaching moment you promised me?
Where's your promise?
Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?
Short answer, probably no and certainly not to a statistically significant degree. I based this on the observation that an additional 120PPM of CO2 has no discernible effect on temperature in a lab setting
Based on your knowledge of statistics, how much would it have to have changed to be statistically significant?
What happened to that teaching moment you promised me?
Where's your promise?
Waiting on your promise, just as I initially stated.
Waiting on your promise, just as I initially stated.
yes and it has gotten cooler. And again, you can't produce one iota of evidence that says how warm 10 PPM of CO2 is. Can you? you can't even give a definition in your own words what is 'excess heat'. In fact, you never provide any body of work that suggest it agrees with anything you post as a warmist. Nothing.Frank, has the world gotten warmer over the last 150 years?