Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
Why do you imagine the media would start calling Hillary on her lies when they have been covering for her all along? The one essential fact that all you douche bags are so desperately trying to ignore is that the media is in Hillary's corner. Once you accept that reality, then everything becomes clear.RWnut hatred of the facts is the best running joke in politics.
Just your facts; not the facts.
Since you nuts on the Right are so certain Hillary Clinton is the worst liar ever (lol) one would think you'd welcome real time fact checking in the debate.
You can't be serious.
I also want to point out that it is the Clinton campaign calling for fact checking and the Trump campaign being against it. That should tell you something.Benghazi, bitch please.
This thread isn't about who lies the most, it's about whether the moderators should fact check the candidates. I say yes, I believe Clinton has been more honest when compared to Trump, so I have nothing to worry about. It would seem it's the Trump supporters who don't think their candidate can handle the pressure.
I would agree. His little minions on this board can't stand the idea of someone standing up to Trump and telling him he's full of shit. Hasn't happened nearly enough in this campaign.
Sure we can stand it, but we won't tolerate it from a so-called "moderator" who is supposed to be impartial.
Dims just can't win unless the game is rigged in their favor.
Can't a moderator be impartial AND point to inaccuracies both?
No.
Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
Said a biased right wing asshole.
I also want to point out that it is the Clinton campaign calling for fact checking and the Trump campaign being against it. That should tell you something.
I would agree. His little minions on this board can't stand the idea of someone standing up to Trump and telling him he's full of shit. Hasn't happened nearly enough in this campaign.
Sure we can stand it, but we won't tolerate it from a so-called "moderator" who is supposed to be impartial.
Dims just can't win unless the game is rigged in their favor.
Can't a moderator be impartial AND point to inaccuracies both?
No.
Sure they can. You can't. But others can.
And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
Said a biased right wing asshole.
I would agree. His little minions on this board can't stand the idea of someone standing up to Trump and telling him he's full of shit. Hasn't happened nearly enough in this campaign.
Sure we can stand it, but we won't tolerate it from a so-called "moderator" who is supposed to be impartial.
Dims just can't win unless the game is rigged in their favor.
Can't a moderator be impartial AND point to inaccuracies both?
No.
Sure they can. You can't. But others can.
That wouldn't include the media.
And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
Said a biased right wing asshole.
Be original. You lack of faith in anyone outside of your small bubble is telling.
Sure we can stand it, but we won't tolerate it from a so-called "moderator" who is supposed to be impartial.
Dims just can't win unless the game is rigged in their favor.
Can't a moderator be impartial AND point to inaccuracies both?
No.
Sure they can. You can't. But others can.
That wouldn't include the media.
Sure they can. I think Chris Wallace should fact check the hell out of both and he's not exactly liberal. To you he probably is but you're to the right of Goebbels.
And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.Many more people will watch the debate than will pore over the next day's factchecking -
that's why Trump doesn't want it to happen in realtime.
Said a biased right wing asshole.
Be original. You lack of faith in anyone outside of your small bubble is telling.
The media has earned my contempt.
Can't a moderator be impartial AND point to inaccuracies both?
No.
Sure they can. You can't. But others can.
That wouldn't include the media.
Sure they can. I think Chris Wallace should fact check the hell out of both and he's not exactly liberal. To you he probably is but you're to the right of Goebbels.
I think Wallace is a registered Democrat.
I'm not surprised you don't know what it means.And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Hmmm, no, he doesn't want the moderators doing any so-called "fact checking" because he knows the moderators are biased hacks who are in Hillary's corner. Most of what you douche bags call "facts" are really just leftwing opinions.
Said a biased right wing asshole.
Be original. You lack of faith in anyone outside of your small bubble is telling.
The media has earned my contempt.
You say that like it means something.
Sure they can. You can't. But others can.
That wouldn't include the media.
Sure they can. I think Chris Wallace should fact check the hell out of both and he's not exactly liberal. To you he probably is but you're to the right of Goebbels.
I think Wallace is a registered Democrat.
He lives in DC, everybody is a Democrat. He's a conservative who espouses conservatives views on a conservative news channel. He's not Sean Hannity, but he's not liberal either.
I'm not surprised you don't know what it means.And a biased leftwing asshole denied it.Said a biased right wing asshole.
Be original. You lack of faith in anyone outside of your small bubble is telling.
The media has earned my contempt.
You say that like it means something.
Traditional Media's Approval Ratings Hit a Pathetic New Low
Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump
Typical corruption from the Clinton Criminal Cartel.
RWnut hatred of the facts is the best running joke in politics.
Just your facts; not the facts.
Since you nuts on the Right are so certain Hillary Clinton is the worst liar ever (lol) one would think you'd welcome real time fact checking in the debate.
RWnut hatred of the facts is the best running joke in politics.
Just your facts; not the facts.
Since you nuts on the Right are so certain Hillary Clinton is the worst liar ever (lol) one would think you'd welcome real time fact checking in the debate.
For The millionth time by whom and who's facts?
.
RWnut hatred of the facts is the best running joke in politics.
Just your facts; not the facts.
Since you nuts on the Right are so certain Hillary Clinton is the worst liar ever (lol) one would think you'd welcome real time fact checking in the debate.
For The millionth time by whom and who's facts?
.
