Clinton/Lynch

Siete

Platinum Member
May 19, 2014
34,325
3,988
1,130
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .


Lynch-Clinton-300x180.jpg
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

No...no...no. Don't you know that when you want to break the law by colluding over an ongoing investigation....the best way is to arrange a secret meeting in a very public place when you know that media will be present.

Wait! Hold on! How did they make the arrangements for this meeting? Talk about a stroke of luck!
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?


if the convo was covert why would an ex POTUS meet at an airport, drive to the tarmac, get out of a car guarded by secrete service agents,, and get on a plane that wasn't about to take off.
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
I don't care what was said, it was a breach of public trust and borderline unethical. Her resignation should have been requested.
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
I don't care what was said, it was a breach of public trust and borderline unethical. Her resignation should have been requested.

Nope. It was a stupid thing POLITICALLY. It had nothing to do with her ethics. She is entirely ethical. Her resignation is in no way necessary.

Next outrage.
 
They had every expectation of obscurity. The meeting was not on Clinton's or Lynch's plane. No one was on that plane to witness the meeting. Not even a pilot. Secret Service was there making sure there were no photos taken.

Phones can be tapped and a warning to Lynch could be more effective in person.

Why do you think the Secret Service repeatedly said "No pictures or cell phones!!"

Someone arranged for an empty plane to be on that tarmac and house the meeting with Clinton and Lynch. Arrangements were made for that meeting at the last minute.

Two Attorney Generals (Clinton was one as well) knew full well that a meeting with the spouse of the targetted person of the investigation was very, very wrong. But it was worth the risk. All that to talk about a golf game and grandchildren. No one believes that, I even doubt in Democrats do.

How long does it take to talk about a golf game and two grandchildren? That would occupy just minutes of the half hour discussion. So what was left to talk about?
 
Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
I don't care what was said, it was a breach of public trust and borderline unethical. Her resignation should have been requested.

Nope. It was a stupid thing POLITICALLY. It had nothing to do with her ethics. She is entirely ethical. Her resignation is in no way necessary.

Next outrage.
It certainly DID have everything to do with ethics. As AG, she has an obligation to be unbiased, real and perceived.
 
They didn't freaking care because they knew sycophants would defend their actions just like the poster. They didn't need to hide their illegal meeting because they knew the left wing media wouldn't care but whoops, it seems that Bubba Bill isn't as immune as he used to be.
 
whatever the hell it was, it gave the RW an opportunity to foam at the mouth, point fingers, and chest pound about both Clintons ... so they're GUD TO GO !
 
whatever the hell it was, it gave the RW an opportunity to foam at the mouth, point fingers, and chest pound about both Clintons ... so they're GUD TO GO !

that is why the perception of impropriety is also important.
 
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.

I was going to point out the same thing. NSA is listening. And they might even suspect the right is listening. Plus, there would be a record of the call.

They didn't think they'd get caught.

They should both be smart enough to know that the appearance of impropriety would be a problem. It doesn't matter whether they were meeting as friends or whether Bill was using his favorite tactic of soft intimidation to get his way, it was wrong for them to meet. Meeting as buddies is just as bad as meeting regarding the case because one shows bias on Lynch's part and the other is just sleazy tactics as usual.

Point is that there never should have been any meeting, phone call, or emails. Meeting is the only way to talk without leaving records. Again, they didn't think they'd get caught but a local reporter noticed them. And he was ordered not to use his camera or phone.
 
Last edited:
Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
I don't care what was said, it was a breach of public trust and borderline unethical. Her resignation should have been requested.

Nope. It was a stupid thing POLITICALLY. It had nothing to do with her ethics. She is entirely ethical. Her resignation is in no way necessary.

Next outrage.

So a woman meets with the man who appointed her to judgeship and this woman is supposedly investigating his wife and you see nothing unethical? If so why did they try and hide it?
 
Last edited:
if either was trying to hide a discussion regarding Hillary, or anything else for that matter


THEY WOULD HAVE USED A DAMN TELEPHONE.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's .

Phones can be tapped. Phone conversations can be overheard.


Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.

pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.



where did you get such a silly idea

Lose The Burners: Court Okays Prepaid Phone Tracking - InformationWeek
 
Helloooooooo, earth to RW's, pre paid cell phones can't be tapped.
If the conversation was benign why would you need a prepaid cell phone?

Ummm....that's why they didn't use one. Hello!!!!!
I don't care what was said, it was a breach of public trust and borderline unethical. Her resignation should have been requested.

Nope. It was a stupid thing POLITICALLY. It had nothing to do with her ethics. She is entirely ethical. Her resignation is in no way necessary.

Next outrage.

So a woman meets with the man who appointed her to judgeship and this woman is supposedly investigating his wife and you see nothing unethical? If so why did they try and hid it?
You're beating a dead horse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top